AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy completely different performance tiers, and the recorded data reflects a decisive gap. The RX 7600M XT delivers an average benchmark score of 12710, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, registering an average of 0. This absence of data means the Intel part cannot be compared directly in any single test, but the architectural specifications alone establish the scale of separation.

The RX 7600M XT produces 20.23 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile reaches 384.0 GFLOPS. That is a 52.6x difference in raw floating-point throughput, a margin that dwarfs any rival comparison in the database. The pixel rate tells a similar story: the AMD part renders 158.0 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel, a 39.5x gap. Texture rate follows, with 316.0 GTexel/s against 12.00 GTexel/s, roughly 26.3x.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7600M XT provide context for its positioning. The AMD part sits 0.5% below the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670, which averages 12773. It also trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830) by 0.9% and the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831) by 0.9%. Against the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm (12625), the RX 7600M XT leads by 0.7%. These deltas are small, placing the RX 7600M XT in a tight cluster of older desktop and workstation parts rather than at the top of any hierarchy. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, which further isolates it from comparative analysis.

In specific benchmark tests, the RX 7600M XT shows its strengths. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 74869, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 27793. In Passmark tests, it scores 13907 in G3D, 7140 in GPU Compute, 894 in G2D, 175 in DirectX 9, 137 in DirectX 11, 76 in DirectX 10, and 58 in DirectX 12. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is 2048. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no entries for any of these tests, so the database contains no comparable scores. Benchmark results indicate that the RX 7600M XT is the only one of these two with measurable performance data, and every available metric shows a dominant advantage.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M XT wins in every category where data exists. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which supports its high fill rates and compute throughput. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile relies on System Shared memory, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent, so no fixed figure can be cited. That dependency means the Intel part's memory performance varies with the host platform, whereas the AMD part has dedicated, consistent bandwidth.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile does hold one advantage: power consumption. Its TDP is 6 W, compared to the RX 7600M XT's 120 W. This is a 20x difference in rated power draw. For systems where thermal limits and battery life dominate, the Intel part is the more efficient option, though it sacrifices compute capability to achieve that efficiency. The RX 7600M XT also uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Intel part connects via a Ring Bus, which ties it to the CPU's integrated architecture.

The RX 7600M XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). That places the AMD part in a higher feature tier for modern graphics APIs. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, so those API levels are equal. The AMD part includes 32 ray tracing cores; the Intel part has none listed. For ray-traced workloads, the RX 7600M XT has dedicated hardware while the Intel part does not.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and entirely different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip built on Xe-LP architecture, belonging to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

The compute configuration differs sharply. The RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores. The AMD part's shading unit count is more than 10x higher, and its TMU and ROP counts are similarly scaled up. The Intel part's base clock is 300 MHz with a boost of 1000 MHz, while the AMD part runs at a base of 1280 MHz, a game clock of 2023 MHz, and a boost of 2469 MHz.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The RX 7600M XT has dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with a 128 bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, operating at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory for size, type, and bus width, with bandwidth described as System Dependent. The AMD part's memory is fixed and predictable; the Intel part's performance depends entirely on the host system's memory configuration.

The RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W and no power connectors, listed as an IGP slot width. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and also uses an IGP slot width, with no power connector data. The AMD part's release date is 2023-01-03, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-12-31, making the Intel part roughly two years newer in launch timing. The AMD part's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, while the Intel part has no predecessor listed. Both are marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The AMD part leads by roughly 52.6x.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: No. The RX 7600M XT includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed.

Q: What are the API differences between the two?

A: The RX 7600M XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part has a higher DirectX feature level.

Q: How does memory configuration differ?

A: The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU consumes less power?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W, compared to the RX 7600M XT's 120 W, a 20x difference in rated power draw.

Q: Why does the Intel GPU have no benchmark scores?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, so its average benchmark score is 0 and no nearest rivals are listed. The RX 7600M XT has ten recorded benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is the only viable choice for any graphics-heavy workload. Every recorded benchmark belongs to it, and its architectural specifications outclass the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile in compute throughput, memory bandwidth, pixel rate, texture rate, and feature support. The RX 7600M XT sits within 1% of several older NVIDIA and AMD discrete GPUs, confirming it as a mid-range performer in the database's overall distribution, with a percentile rank of 52 among all GPUs.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, with a percentile rank of 50 and no recorded scores, offers only its low 6 W TDP as a distinguishing characteristic. It would suit a system where power draw is the primary constraint and graphics performance is secondary. The RX 7600M XT requires 120 W, so it demands a platform that can supply and cool that power. For any application involving gaming, rendering, or compute, the RX 7600M XT's 2048 shading units, 32 ray tracing cores, and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth make it the decisive pick. The Intel part is an integrated solution with 192 shading units and no ray tracing hardware, appropriate only for basic display output and low-power operation.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-LP |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 192 |

| TMUs | 128 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | none |

| Base Clock | 1280 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2469 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| FP32 Compute | 20.23 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 40.45 TFLOPS (2:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 158.0 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 316.0 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 120 W | 6 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-12-31 |