AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum. The database records a full benchmark suite for the AMD part, while the Intel integrated graphics unit has no recorded benchmark scores. The RX 7600 XT sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17083. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, though its average benchmark score is listed as 0 due to the absence of recorded tests. This data gap defines the comparison: the RX 7600 XT is a measured discrete graphics card, while the Intel part is an entry-level integrated solution with no verified performance data in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty. No direct comparative tests exist between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile in the database. The RX 7600 XT does have a full set of individual benchmark scores, but the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has none. This asymmetry means any performance comparison relies on the architectural and specification data recorded for each part.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT delivers 2348 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. In Geekbench, it scores 92426 in OpenCL and 48366 in Vulkan. Passmark results show 85 in DirectX 10, 167 in DirectX 11, 65 in DirectX 12, and 228 in DirectX 9. The GPU compute score is 8987, and the G3D score is 17132. The G2D score is 1030. These figures represent the full measured output for the AMD card.

The average benchmark score of 17083 for the RX 7600 XT places it in a tight cluster of rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 averages 17037, a delta of 0.3% in favor of the AMD card. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M averages 17019, a delta of 0.4% in favor of the RX 7600 XT. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 averages 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT, making it the only rival in the recorded set that leads the AMD card. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 averages 16932, a delta of 0.9% in favor of the RX 7600 XT. These deltas are all under one percent, indicating that the RX 7600 XT performs essentially within the same band as these four GPUs in the database's aggregate scoring.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The database cannot confirm any performance level for this integrated GPU through measured tests. The only performance indicator is the percentile rank of 50, which places it at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without any score data to support that rank, the figure carries limited analytical weight.

The Verdict

The data supports only one clear verdict: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a fully measured discrete GPU with a substantial benchmark record, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded performance data. Any user requiring verified graphics performance should rely on the RX 7600 XT, as its 60th percentile rank and average score of 17083 are backed by ten individual benchmark results. The Intel part, despite its 50th percentile rank, has zero measured scores, so the database offers no evidence of its practical performance.

The RX 7600 XT also carries a launch MSRP of 329 USD, a detail recorded in the database for the AMD card. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no launch MSRP field populated. The RX 7600 XT is a dual-slot card with a 190 W TDP and a recommended 450 W PSU, while the Intel part is an IGP with a 6 W TDP and no PSU recommendation. These figures confirm the fundamental positioning: one is a high-power discrete component, the other is a low-power integrated unit.

For users selecting between these two, the RX 7600 XT is the only option with recorded performance. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile appears in the database as an active product with a 50th percentile rank, but no test data supports any claim about its speed. The verdict, strictly from the data, is that the RX 7600 XT is the measurable choice, and the Intel IGP remains unverified.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation, part of the Radeon RX 7000 series. The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. The die size is 204 mm², and the transistor count is 13,300 million, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip built on Xe-LP architecture. It belongs to the HD Graphics-T generation, also labeled Twin Lake. The process node is 10 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The transistor count and die size are both recorded as unknown, and no transistor density is listed.

The RX 7600 XT includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores recorded. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units. The AMD card's compute rates are 176.3 GPixel/s pixel rate, 352.6 GTexel/s texture rate, and 22.57 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel part records 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate, 12.00 GTexel/s texture rate, and 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The RX 7600 XT lists FP16 at 22.57 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Specification Differences

The memory configuration is a major separator. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, with bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, stated as 18 Gbps effective. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all recorded as system dependent. The memory clock is listed as system shared.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a boost clock of 2755 MHz, and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with no game clock listed.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W, is dual-slot, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 450 W PSU. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W, is an IGP, has no power connectors, no PSU recommendation, and uses a Ring Bus interface.

Display outputs also differ. The RX 7600 XT provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel part's outputs are recorded as portable device dependent. The RX 7600 XT has physical dimensions of 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Intel part has no dimensions recorded.

Release timing is recorded for both. The RX 7600 XT was released on 2024-01-23, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile on 2024-12-31. The RX 7600 XT lists its predecessor as Navi II and successor as Navi IV. The Intel part lists neither a predecessor nor a successor. The RX 7600 XT has a launch MSRP of 329 USD, while the Intel part has none.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark tests.

Q: What is the percentile rank of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its nearest recorded rivals?

A: The RX 7600 XT is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7970M, 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, and 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla M4.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The RX 7600 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: What are the TDP figures for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and recommends a 450 W PSU. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and has no PSU recommendation.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The RX 7600 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins in every category where the database holds measured data. Its 2348 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, its Geekbench scores of 92426 in OpenCL and 48366 in Vulkan, and its Passmark scores across DirectX 9 through 12 all represent verified results. The GPU compute score of 8987 and G3D score of 17132 further establish its measured capabilities. The RX 7600 XT also wins on memory capacity with 16 GB of GDDR6, on bandwidth with 288.0 GB/s, and on raw compute with 22.57 TFLOPS FP32. Its 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores give it a structural advantage in every hardware category recorded.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark wins. Its only advantages in the database are the 50th percentile rank, which is below the RX 7600 XT's 60th percentile, and its low power profile. The 6 W TDP compared to 190 W means the Intel part is suited for low-power integrated scenarios, but no benchmark data confirms any performance outcome. Its system shared memory and portable device dependent display outputs indicate a design for compact, low-power devices, but the database offers no scores to quantify that design's effectiveness.

The RX 7600 XT is the choice for any workload requiring discrete graphics performance. The data shows 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 352.6 GTexel/s texture rate, and 176.3 GPixel/s pixel rate, figures that dwarf the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, 12.00 GTexel/s, and 4.000 GPixel/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile remains an unmeasured integrated solution, with no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and no verified performance data. The database records the RX 7600 XT as a complete, active product with a full test history, while the Intel part exists as a specification entry without performance validation.