AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M and Intel Arc Pro B370 represent two distinct approaches to integrated and mobile graphics. The RX 6550M is a dedicated discrete GPU built on AMD’s RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the Arc Pro B370 is an integrated solution from Intel based on the Xe3-LPG architecture. The database shows a significant performance gap, with the AMD part holding an 85th percentile rank among all GPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. The RX 6550M delivers an average benchmark score of 46,702, whereas the Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, indicating a clear performance disparity.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is the unequivocal performance leader in this comparison. It has recorded benchmark scores in both OpenCL and Vulkan, achieving 42,536 and 50,867 respectively. This data confirms its capability as a mobile gaming and compute solution. Its average benchmark score of 46,702 places it ahead of several notable rivals, including the Intel Arc A530M, which scores 46,614, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which scores 46,601. The RX 6550M also outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46,043) and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972) by 1.4% and 1.6% respectively. These results place it firmly in the upper echelon of mobile GPUs.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. This does not necessarily mean it cannot perform tasks, but the database lacks any quantitative evidence of its real-world speed. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits at the median of all GPUs, which is a middle-of-the-road position. The only way to characterize its strengths is through its architectural specifications, which indicate a focus on low power consumption (25 W TDP) rather than maximum performance. The RX 6550M is the clear winner for any use case requiring measured graphics throughput, while the Arc Pro B370 offers no proven performance wins in the current data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M uses the Navi 24 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 50.5 million transistors per square millimeter. This is a discrete GPU with its own dedicated memory and power delivery. The Arc Pro B370, on the other hand, is an integrated processor using the Panther Lake chip, fabricated on Intel’s 3 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are unknown, and it is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor). This means it shares system resources and relies on system memory for all graphics operations.

The memory subsystems are entirely different. The RX 6550M has 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 144.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning its bandwidth is "System Dependent" and tied to the host system’s RAM. Clock speeds also differ markedly. The RX 6550M has a base clock of 2000 MHz, a boost clock of 2840 MHz, and a game clock of 2560 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a much lower base clock of 300 MHz but a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The compute configurations are also distinct: the RX 6550M has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, while the Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The AMD part also carries more ray tracing cores (16 versus 10).

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so their API feature sets are aligned. The RX 6550M is an active product released in early 2023, while the Arc Pro B370 was released later and is also active. The AMD part uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, whereas the Intel part uses an integrated bus interface. Power consumption is a major differentiator: the RX 6550M has an 80 W TDP, while the Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP. This suggests the Intel part is designed for ultra-low-power systems, while the AMD part is for more performance-oriented laptops.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two products. The comparison must therefore be constructed from the individual recorded scores. The RX 6550M’s OpenCL score of 42,536 demonstrates strong general-purpose compute performance. Its Vulkan score of 50,867 is notably higher, showing particularly good graphics API efficiency. These are the only two recorded performance metrics for either product. The Arc Pro B370 has no scores at all, making a direct numeric comparison impossible.

The database does provide context for the RX 6550M through its nearest rivals. Its average score of 46,702 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Arc A530M (46,614) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601). It is 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46,043) and 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972). These deltas show that the RX 6550M is competitive with, and slightly ahead of, a range of other mid-range mobile and workstation GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 has no such rival data, reinforcing its status as an unproven quantity in benchmark terms. The recorded data indicates that the RX 6550M is a capable performer in its class, while the Arc Pro B370’s performance remains unverified.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6550M has an average benchmark score of 46,702. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average score of zero, as it has no recorded benchmarks.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each product?

A: The RX 6550M has 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus and 144.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses System Shared memory with System Shared bandwidth, which is dependent on the host system.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The RX 6550M has a TDP of 80 W, while the Arc Pro B370 has a much lower TDP of 25 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The RX 6550M uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The RX 6550M has a boost clock of 2840 MHz, which is higher than the Arc Pro B370’s boost clock of 2400 MHz.

Specification Differences

The following table outlines the key specification differences between the two products.

• Chip: Navi 24 vs Panther Lake
• Architecture: RDNA 2.0 vs Xe3-LPG
• Process Node: 6 nm (TSMC) vs 3 nm (Intel)
• Transistors: 5,400 million vs unknown
• Die Size: 107 mm² vs unknown
• Base Clock: 2000 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2840 MHz vs 2400 MHz
• Game Clock: 2560 MHz vs not applicable
• Memory Size: 4 GB GDDR6 vs System Shared
• Memory Bus: 64 bit vs System Shared
• Memory Bandwidth: 144.0 GB/s vs System Dependent
• Shading Units: 1024 vs 1280
• TMUs: 64 vs 40
• ROPs: 32 vs 20
• Ray Tracing Cores: 16 vs 10
• Pixel Rate: 90.88 GPixel/s vs 48.00 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 181.8 GTexel/s vs 96.00 GTexel/s
• FP32 Performance: 5.816 TFLOPS vs 6.144 TFLOPS
• FP16 Performance: 11.63 TFLOPS (2:1) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 80 W vs 25 W
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x4 vs IGP
• Release Date: 2023-01-03 vs 2026-01-26
• Predecessor: Polaris Mobile vs HD Graphics-WM
• Percentile Rank: 85th vs 50th
• Average Benchmark Score: 46,702 vs 0
• Nearest Rivals: Intel Arc A530M, AMD Radeon RX 5600M, NVIDIA RTX A2000, NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs none