AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum. The recorded data shows the AMD part sits in the 94th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel integrated graphics lands at the 50th percentile. The Radeon PRO W7900 delivers an average benchmark score of 110725, whereas the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, yielding an average of 0.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the only choice for compute-intensive workloads, large model rendering, or any task requiring dedicated VRAM. Its 48 GB of GDDR6 memory, 6144 shading units, and 61.32 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput place it in a professional workstation class. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, with 192 shading units, 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, and shared system memory, serves only as a basic display output solution for low-power portable devices.

The data indicates no meaningful competition between these two products. The Intel part uses 6 W of power and integrates into a processor package, while the AMD card requires a 295 W TDP, a 600 W suggested PSU, and a triple-slot cooler. Users needing any level of 3D acceleration should choose the AMD product; users needing only basic display capabilities in an ultra-mobile system would accept the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon PRO W7900 uses the Navi 31 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with the RDNA 3.0 architecture and Plum Bonito codename. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process, employing the Xe-LP architecture within the HD Graphics-T generation.

Transistor counts reveal the scale difference. The AMD chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown. The AMD silicon is a discrete, triple-slot card measuring 280 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width. The Intel part is an IGP with no recorded dimensions.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The Radeon PRO W7900 uses 48 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, achieving 864.0 GB/s bandwidth with memory clocks at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent and no dedicated memory bus.

Clock behavior differs by design intent. The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1760 MHz and boosts to 2495 MHz. The Intel part operates at a 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. The AMD card includes 96 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part lists no ray tracing hardware.

API support shows parity in some areas. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), one feature level lower. The AMD card's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 61.32 TFLOPS (1:1), while the Intel part achieves 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 from 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, a 2:1 ratio.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database for these two products. The head-to-head array is empty, and each product records zero wins in that category. Direct comparisons must instead draw from the separate benchmark fields available for the AMD card and the architectural specifications for both.

The Radeon PRO W7900's Geekbench OpenCL score is 84379, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 137070. The average of these two scores, 110725, places it in the 94th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries, contributing its 50th percentile ranking and an average score of 0.

The nearest rivals for the AMD card provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114395, which is 3.2% ahead of the Radeon PRO W7900. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113944, 2.8% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega II scores 109617, 1% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600X scores 107342, 3.2% behind. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals recorded, indicating no comparable products in its performance bracket.

Pixel and texture rates illustrate the throughput gap. The AMD card renders 479.0 GPixel/s and textures at 958.1 GTexel/s. The Intel part manages 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. The AMD card is roughly 120 times faster in pixel throughput and nearly 80 times faster in texture throughput based on the recorded figures.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 records an average benchmark score of 110725, placing it in the 94th percentile. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmarks, giving it an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How much memory does each GPU provide?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus with 864.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated size, type, bus width, or bandwidth figures.

Q: What are the power requirements for each product?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 has a 295 W TDP, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and needs a 600 W suggested PSU. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP and lists no power connectors or PSU requirement.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have ray tracing support?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 includes 96 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the nearest competitive products to the AMD Radeon PRO W7900?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 113944 (2.8% ahead), the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114395 (3.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II at 109617 (1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X at 107342 (3.2% behind). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 wins in every measurable compute category. Its FP32 throughput of 61.32 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS. The AMD card's 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units far exceed the Intel part's 192, 12, and 4 respectively. The AMD card's 96 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads that the Intel part cannot attempt.

The AMD product wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 48 GB of GDDR6 with 864.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large datasets and high-resolution textures. The Intel part relies on system shared memory, making its performance dependent on the host platform's memory configuration.

The AMD card wins on display output flexibility with 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by the laptop or handheld design.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins only in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 6 W TDP allows operation without additional cooling or power connectors, and its IGP form factor takes no expansion slot space. The AMD card requires 295 W, a triple-slot cooler, and a 600 W PSU.

The Intel part also wins on release recency in the database, with a release date of 2024-12-31 compared to the AMD card's 2023-05-25. The AMD card remains in active production status, as does the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 uses the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip with Xe-LP architecture. The AMD card is built on a 5 nm TSMC process; the Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm process.

The AMD card's base clock is 1760 MHz with a 2495 MHz boost, compared to the Intel part's 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. Memory configuration differs fundamentally: the AMD card uses 48 GB GDDR6 with a 384-bit bus and 864.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Compute unit counts differ by orders of magnitude. The AMD card has 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, 192 ROPs, and 96 RT cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no RT cores. The AMD card achieves 479.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 958.1 GTexel/s texture rate; the Intel part achieves 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance is 61.32 TFLOPS for the AMD card versus 384.0 GFLOPS for the Intel part. FP16 performance is 61.32 TFLOPS (1:1) for AMD versus 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) for Intel. TDP is 295 W versus 6 W. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel part uses Ring Bus.

The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 3,999 USD. The Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP. The AMD card measures 280 mm by 110 mm by 51 mm. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions. The AMD card requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 600 W PSU; the Intel part lists neither. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2); the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega; the Intel part has no recorded predecessor.