AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Radeon PRO W7800?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has an average benchmark score of 164,894, derived from its Geekbench OpenCL score of 154,366 and Vulkan score of 175,422.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The database shows the Radeon PRO W7800 is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5500 (165,217), 0.7% behind the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation (166,094), 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB (162,504), and 2.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X (168,574).

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Radeon PRO W7800 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The Radeon also has 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, whereas the Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Q: What are the respective power requirements?

A: The Radeon PRO W7800 has a TDP of 260 W and requires a 600 W suggested PSU with 2x 8-pin power connectors. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing hardware?

A: The Radeon PRO W7800 includes 70 RT cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no RT cores, indicating it lacks dedicated ray tracing hardware.

Q: What are the DirectX version support levels?

A: The Radeon PRO W7800 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy entirely different segments of the GPU market, and their architectural designs reflect that separation. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on the Navi 31 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel part uses the Twin Lake chip with the Xe-LP architecture, classified under HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake).

Manufacturing processes diverge sharply. The Radeon PRO W7800 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors packed into a 529 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

The compute configurations are vastly different in scale. The Radeon PRO W7800 deploys 4,480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs. It also carries 70 dedicated RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no RT cores listed. This is a 23.3x difference in shading units, 23.3x in TMUs, and 32x in ROPs, illustrating the Radeon's workstation-class compute capacity versus the Intel part's integrated graphics role.

Clock behavior also differs fundamentally. The Radeon PRO W7800 has a base clock of 1895 MHz and a boost clock of 2525 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile starts at 300 MHz base and boosts to 1000 MHz. The Radeon's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated clock or bandwidth figures.

Memory architecture separates these products completely. The Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, typical of integrated graphics. This makes the Radeon suitable for large datasets and memory-intensive workloads, while the Intel part relies on the host system's memory pool.

The bus interfaces differ accordingly. The Radeon PRO W7800 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, providing a direct high-bandwidth connection to the host. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a Ring Bus, reflecting its integrated position on the processor die. Display outputs also differ: the Radeon provides 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel part's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Pixel and texture rates quantify the performance gap. The Radeon PRO W7800 achieves 323.2 GPixel/s and 707.0 GTexel/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile reaches 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. These figures represent 80.8x and 58.9x differences respectively, confirming the Radeon's dominance in fill-rate-bound workloads.

FP32 and FP16 compute follow the same pattern. The Radeon PRO W7800 delivers 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 and 90.50 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile produces 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). This is a 117.8x difference in FP32 throughput.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation-class discrete GPU for professional rendering, simulation, and compute tasks. Its 32 GB GDDR6 memory, 70 RT cores, and 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it in the 97th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals all sit within a narrow band: 0.2% behind the RTX A5500, 0.7% behind the RTX 4500 Ada Generation, 1.5% ahead of the A100 PCIe 40 GB, and 2.2% behind the Radeon Pro W6900X. The average benchmark score of 164,894 reflects a balanced OpenCL and Vulkan capability.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupies the opposite end of the spectrum. It sits in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmarks exist in the database. Its 192 shading units, 4 ROPs, and 6 W TDP define it as a low-power integrated solution for basic display output and light acceleration. The 300 MHz base clock and 1000 MHz boost clock, combined with system shared memory, suit it for portable devices where power efficiency and minimal footprint matter more than compute throughput.

Users with rendering, AI inference, or large dataset workloads should select the Radeon PRO W7800 based on its 97th percentile ranking and its competitive position against the RTX A5500 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation. The Radeon's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32 GB capacity support large scenes and models. Its launch MSRP was 2,499 USD.

Users needing an integrated GPU for a mobile device should consider the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. Its 6 W TDP and Ring Bus interface make it appropriate for ultra-portable systems where battery life and thermal constraints are primary. The absence of dedicated RT cores and the reliance on system shared memory indicate it is not intended for demanding 3D workloads.

The data shows no overlap in target use cases. The Radeon PRO W7800 delivers workstation performance with dual-slot cooling and 2x 8-pin power connectors. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an IGP with no power connectors and no dimensions listed, designed for direct integration into a processor package.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification in the database.

Process and Die: The Radeon PRO W7800 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel with unknown transistor count and die size.

Clocks: The Radeon PRO W7800 has a base clock of 1895 MHz and boost clock of 2525 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 1000 MHz.

Memory: The Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective). The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Compute Units: The Radeon PRO W7800 has 4,480 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs.

Ray Tracing: The Radeon PRO W7800 includes 70 RT cores. The Intel part lists no RT cores.

Performance Rates: The Radeon PRO W7800 achieves 323.2 GPixel/s and 707.0 GTexel/s. The Intel part achieves 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s.

Compute Throughput: The Radeon PRO W7800 delivers 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 and 90.50 TFLOPS FP16. The Intel part delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16.

Power: The Radeon PRO W7800 has a 260 W TDP, dual-slot width, 2x 8-pin power connectors, and a 600 W suggested PSU. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

Bus Interface: The Radeon PRO W7800 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Intel part uses Ring Bus.

Dimensions: The Radeon PRO W7800 measures 280 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Intel part has no dimensions listed.

Release Date: The Radeon PRO W7800 was released on 2023-04-12. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31.

DirectX: The Radeon PRO W7800 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Benchmarks: The Radeon PRO W7800 has recorded Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores. The Intel part has no recorded benchmarks.

Percentile: The Radeon PRO W7800 sits in the 97th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel part sits in the 50th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The win count is 0 for both sides, and no shared test results exist. This reflects the enormous performance gap and different market positions of the two products.

However, the individual benchmark data provides a clear picture. The Radeon PRO W7800 records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 154,366 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 175,422. Its average benchmark score is 164,894. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmarks, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0. This means the Radeon's average score exceeds the Intel part's recorded score by the full 164,894 points.

The Radeon PRO W7800's nearest rival comparisons place it in a competitive workstation context. It trails the NVIDIA RTX A5500 by 0.2% in average score, trails the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation by 0.7%, leads the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB by 1.5%, and trails the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X by 2.2%. These deltas are all within a narrow 3.7% band, indicating the Radeon PRO W7800 performs at parity with its direct workstation competitors.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed in the database, and its 50th percentile ranking with zero recorded benchmarks places it below every GPU with recorded data. Its 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput is a small fraction of the Radeon's 45.25 TFLOPS, a difference of 117.8x. The pixel rate of 4.000 GPixel/s versus 323.2 GPixel/s represents an 80.8x gap, and the texture rate of 12.00 GTexel/s versus 707.0 GTexel/s is a 58.9x difference.

The Radeon PRO W7800's memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s versus the Intel part's system dependent bandwidth cannot be directly compared numerically, but the 32 GB GDDR6 allocation versus system shared memory indicates a fundamental capacity and latency advantage for the Radeon.

In practical terms, the Radeon PRO W7800's Vulkan score of 175,422 exceeds its OpenCL score of 154,366, suggesting stronger performance in Vulkan-based workloads. The Intel part has no scores to compare, so its relative API performance remains unmeasured in the database.

The release dates provide context. The Radeon PRO W7800 launched on 2023-04-12, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile launched on 2024-12-31. Despite releasing later, the Intel part does not approach the Radeon's performance tier. The Radeon PRO W7800 remains active in production status, as does the Intel part, but they serve entirely different hardware ecosystems: discrete workstation GPU versus integrated mobile graphics.