AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data draws a clear separation between these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a discrete workstation graphics card with a substantial performance profile, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated processor graphics solution for portable devices. The benchmark database shows the AMD part with an average benchmark score of 87108, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all GPUs tracked. The Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and its average benchmark score sits at zero, with a 50th percentile ranking. This means the AMD card wins every measurable category where data exists, while the Intel solution has no recorded wins in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 dominates in raw compute, memory bandwidth, and rendering throughput. Its recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 81528 and Vulkan score of 92688 provide concrete evidence of its capability in general-purpose and graphics workloads. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, has no benchmark entries, so the database cannot quantify its performance in any test. The only arena where the Intel part could be considered advantageous is in power consumption, with a 6 W TDP compared to the AMD card's 130 W TDP, and in its integrated form factor that requires no additional power connectors or slot space.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, employing the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process, employing the Xe-LP architecture from the HD Graphics-T generation. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The AMD card features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and only 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. This represents a 10.7x difference in shading units, a 10.7x difference in TMUs, and a 16x difference in ROPs. The clock speeds also differ dramatically. The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1720 MHz and boosts to 2440 MHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and boosts to 1000 MHz.

Memory architecture is entirely different. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. This means the Intel solution borrows from the host system's memory pool rather than having its own dedicated VRAM.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between these two GPUs in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 87108, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of zero. The AMD card sits in the 93rd percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel part sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database lists four nearest rivals for the AMD card. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 scores 87445, which is 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX scores 85637, which is 1.7% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 91134, which is 4.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 scores 91671, which is 5% higher.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and requires a suggested 300 W power supply. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested power supply listed.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: The database does not list any ray tracing cores for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 32 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the host system's memory.

Q: What is the release date and production status of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 was released on August 2, 2023, and is listed as active in production. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on December 31, 2024, and is also listed as active in production.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The process node differs, with AMD using 6 nm at TSMC and Intel using 10 nm at Intel foundry. The AMD chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while Intel's transistor count and die size are unknown. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and boost clock of 2440 MHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 1000 MHz.

The shading unit count differs substantially, with 2048 on the AMD card versus 192 on the Intel part. TMU counts are 128 versus 12, and ROP counts are 64 versus 4. The AMD card includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part lists none. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Pixel rate on the AMD card is 156.2 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s on the Intel part. Texture rate is 312.3 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.99 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 39.98 TFLOPS versus 768.0 GFLOPS, both with 2:1 ratios. The TDP is 130 W versus 6 W. The AMD card is single-slot with a 1x 6-pin power connector and requires a 300 W power supply. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel part uses a ring bus interface. Display outputs differ as well, with the AMD card having 4x DisplayPort 2.1 and the Intel part being portable device dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. However, the individual recorded benchmarks for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 provide meaningful context. The card scores 81528 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92688 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmarks, so no direct comparison of test scores is possible.

The nearest rival data for the AMD card shows how it stacks against other professional GPUs. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 has an average score of 87445, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD card's 87108. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX has an average score of 85637, which is 1.7% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has an average score of 91134, which is 4.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 has an average score of 91671, which is 5% higher. These deltas position the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 slightly below the Quadro GP100 and RTX A4500 variants, but above the CMP 40HX.

The compute throughput figures reinforce the performance gap. The AMD card's FP32 output of 19.99 TFLOPS is orders of magnitude higher than the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS. The pixel rate of 156.2 GPixel/s on the AMD card versus 4.000 GPixel/s on the Intel part represents a 39x difference. The texture rate difference is even larger at 26x, with 312.3 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. These figures indicate that the AMD card is designed for demanding workstation workloads, while the Intel part serves basic display and light compute tasks in portable devices.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the far more capable GPU for compute-intensive tasks. Its 93rd percentile ranking, recorded benchmark scores above 81000 in both OpenCL and Vulkan, and substantial compute throughput figures establish it as a legitimate workstation-class component. The 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample resources for professional applications. The 32 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 make it suitable for modern graphics workloads.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile serves a different purpose entirely. As a 6 W integrated GPU with system shared memory, it is designed for basic display output and light acceleration in mobile devices. Its 192 shading units and 4 ROPs limit it to modest workloads. The lack of any recorded benchmark scores in the database means its actual performance cannot be quantified, but the architectural specifications suggest it is not intended for demanding tasks.

The AMD card carries a launch MSRP of 599 USD and has been active since August 2023. Its predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and it uses a single-slot design measuring 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Intel part was released in December 2024 and has no listed predecessor or MSRP. Its dimensions are not recorded, consistent with its integrated nature.

For users requiring professional-grade compute performance, the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the only viable option between these two. For portable devices where power efficiency is paramount, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile provides integrated graphics capabilities without additional hardware. The database shows no scenario where the Intel part outperforms the AMD card in measured benchmarks, but its 6 W TDP and integrated form factor make it suitable for low-power mobile systems. The choice depends entirely on the workload and platform requirements, with the data favoring the AMD card for any compute-intensive application.