AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for these two cards is asymmetrical. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has two benchmark entries in the database, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible based on measured results, but the available numbers still position the AMD card clearly within the broader GPU landscape.

The Radeon PRO V710 scores 853 in the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. In Geekbench OpenCL, it records 116,460 points. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 58,657. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX shows an average benchmark score of zero and has no entries in the nearest rivals list, indicating that the database has not yet captured any performance data for this card.

The percentile ranking tells a more complete story. The Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. That places it in the top 12 percent of all recorded graphics cards. The LX MAX sits at the 50th percentile by default, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than an actual performance tier.

The nearest rivals for the Radeon PRO V710 provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, which is 0.2 percent lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58,392, which is 0.5 percent lower. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58,239, which is 0.7 percent lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58,085, which is 1 percent lower. The Radeon PRO V710 leads all four by small margins, with the largest gap being 1 percent over the RX 5600 OEM.

These deltas are narrow. The data shows a tightly clustered group of cards around the 58,000 to 58,700 average score range. The Radeon PRO V710 does not dominate its nearest rivals by a wide margin; it holds a slight edge in every comparison. The 88th percentile ranking is the stronger indicator of where this card sits relative to the full database.

The LX MAX has no head-to-head benchmark entries and no wins recorded in either direction. The database lists zero wins for both cards in direct comparisons. This means any performance judgment for the LX MAX must rely entirely on its architecture and specification profile rather than measured results.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the LX MAX, an average benchmark score of zero, and an empty nearest rivals list.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO V710 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It leads all four nearest rivals by narrow margins. It is 0.2 percent ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100, 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 0.7 percent ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, and 1 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Radeon card is higher in this metric.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). They also both support OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan support differs: the Radeon PRO V710 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor count?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The LX MAX transistor count is listed as unknown in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different architectures. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0, AMD's graphics architecture, using the Navi 32 chip. Its codename is Wheat Nas, and it belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation under the Navi III Series. The LX MAX uses an architecture called TrueGPU, based on the 7G106 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation.

The manufacturing process separates them by one node generation. The Radeon PRO V710 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX MAX uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The Radeon card packs 28,100 million transistors into a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX MAX has unknown transistor and die size figures in the database.

Compute unit composition differs significantly. The Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and no listed ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has substantially more shading units, nearly double the Radeon card, but fewer texture mapping units.

Ray tracing support is a clear differentiator. The Radeon PRO V710 explicitly lists 54 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX lists null for ray tracing cores, which means the database has no recorded information on this feature.

FP16 compute shows an architectural divergence. The Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 1:1 ratio relative to FP32. The LX MAX delivers 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. This indicates the LX MAX architecture is designed to double FP16 throughput relative to FP32, while the Radeon card processes both at the same rate.

The API support reflects different maturity levels. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon PRO V710 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The Radeon card is one Vulkan revision ahead.

Specification Differences

The memory subsystems differ in capacity and bandwidth. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Radeon card has more than double the memory capacity and 72 GB/s more bandwidth.

Clock speeds are only partially recorded. The Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clock data in the database. Both cards share the same memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The power profiles differ. The Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 450 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The LX MAX draws 67 W more under the TDP rating and requires a 100 W larger power supply recommendation.

Physical dimensions separate them. The Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot card with no recorded length, height, or width dimensions. The LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The LX MAX takes up more expansion slot space.

Display outputs are a major difference. The Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs at all. The LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. This makes the Radeon card unsuitable for direct display connection, while the LX MAX can drive up to four displays.

The bus interface is identical. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16. The production status differs: the LX MAX is listed as active, while the Radeon PRO V710 has no production status recorded. Release dates also differ. The Radeon PRO V710 was released on 2024-10-02. The LX MAX has a later release date of 2026-03-16.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon PRO V710 wins in compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 27.65 TFLOPS exceeds the LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS by 3.07 TFLOPS. This gives it an advantage in workloads that rely on single-precision floating point math. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s matches the LX MAX exactly, but its texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s is higher than the LX MAX's 384.0 GTexel/s. The Radeon card processes textures faster.

The Radeon PRO V710 also wins on memory capacity. With 28 GB versus 12 GB, it holds more than double the VRAM. This matters for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and workloads that require substantial memory residency. Its 504.0 GB/s bandwidth is also higher.

The Radeon PRO V710 wins on ray tracing capability. It has 54 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing cores. Applications that use ray-traced effects will have hardware acceleration on the Radeon card. The LX MAX has no such hardware listed.

The Radeon PRO V710 wins on Vulkan support. It supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Applications built against newer Vulkan revisions gain access to newer features.

The LX MAX wins on shading unit count. Its 6,144 shading units are nearly double the Radeon PRO V710's 3,456. This gives it a theoretical advantage in workloads that scale with shading unit count, even though its FP32 throughput is lower. The FP16 ratio of 2:1 means the LX MAX can process half-precision math at 49.15 TFLOPS, which is substantially higher than the Radeon card's 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput.

The LX MAX wins on display connectivity. It has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Radeon PRO V710 has none. Any workload requiring direct display output favors the LX MAX.

The LX MAX wins on physical integration. Its dimensions are recorded at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The Radeon PRO V710 has no recorded dimensions, making its physical footprint unknown.

The LX MAX wins on production status. It is listed as active, indicating ongoing availability. The Radeon PRO V710 has no production status recorded.

The Verdict

The data supports different choices depending on the workload. For compute-heavy tasks that require FP32 throughput, the Radeon PRO V710 is the stronger option. It delivers 27.65 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 3.07 TFLOPS advantage. Its 504.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 28 GB capacity give it room for large working sets. The 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms it performs at a high level relative to the broader database.

For workloads that need display output, the LX MAX is the only choice. The Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for any direct visual output. The LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connections. Its 12 GB memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are lower than the Radeon card, but still substantial for many tasks.

For half-precision compute, the LX MAX holds the advantage. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput with a 2:1 ratio doubles its FP32 rate. The Radeon PRO V710 processes FP16 at the same rate as FP32, 27.65 TFLOPS. Applications that can use half-precision math will run faster on the LX MAX.

The power requirements favor the Radeon PRO V710. Its 158 W TDP with a 450 W suggested power supply is modest. The LX MAX requires 225 W and a 550 W suggested power supply. The Radeon card is easier to integrate into existing systems with lower power budgets.

The gap in measured performance data is the deciding factor. The Radeon PRO V710 has recorded benchmark scores, a percentile ranking, and a nearest rivals list. The LX MAX has none of these. Any purchase decision for the LX MAX relies entirely on its specification sheet, with no validation from benchmark results. The Radeon PRO V710 has confirmable performance data showing it at the 88th percentile.

The Radeon PRO V710 is the better choice for compute-focused deployments with confirmed performance. The LX MAX is the better choice for applications requiring display outputs or half-precision throughput, with the caveat that its performance is unverified in the database.