AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between these two parts, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are limited by the absence of shared test results. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 carries two benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This absence of data for the Intel part means every quantitative comparison must rely on the AMD card's absolute results and its position relative to other GPUs in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, a position that reflects no recorded data rather than measured performance. The data therefore indicates that the AMD part is the only one of the two with verified compute results.

The nearest rival data for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 provides additional context for its average score. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, which is 0.2% behind the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58,392, a 0.5% deficit. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58,239, trailing by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58,085, which is 1% behind. These margins are narrow, confirming that the Radeon PRO V710 sits in a competitive cluster of GPUs whose average scores differ by roughly one percentage point or less.

Because the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a direct score comparison. The only verifiable numerical relationship between the two cards is architectural, not performance-based. The AMD card's FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is more than four times the Intel card's 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD card's texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s is 4.5 times the Intel card's 96.00 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is exactly four times the Intel card's 48.00 GPixel/s. These figures come from the specification fields, not from benchmark runs, but they indicate the scale of the compute disparity.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, process nodes, and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, which the database lists as Navi III Series. The chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process and contains 28,100 million transistors on a die size of 346 mm². The transistor density works out to 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated by Intel on a 3 nm process. The database records the transistor count and die size as unknown, and no transistor density figure is listed. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor, as indicated by its IGP slot width and bus interface, while the AMD card is a discrete single-slot solution with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which the database translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. Its memory clock is also marked as system shared. This means the Intel part relies entirely on host system memory rather than dedicated VRAM.

Compute resources differ sharply. The AMD card has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The AMD card's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 27.65 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel card achieves 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, indicating different vector throughput designs.

Power and physical requirements also separate the two. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested power supply of 450 W. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, needs no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part is an IGP. Display outputs differ as well: the AMD card has no outputs, suited for compute-only or server workloads, while the Intel card's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card has a release date of October 2, 2024, while the Intel card is dated January 26, 2026. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the Intel card's predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. Neither card has a successor listed, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every category where the database contains measurable data. Its 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the headline compute figure, supported by 432.0 GTexel/s texture throughput and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel throughput. The 504.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on a 224-bit bus gives it a substantial advantage for bandwidth-bound workloads. The 28 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is the largest memory allocation between the two, useful for large datasets or high-resolution rendering tasks.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD card's 158 W, and it requires no auxiliary power connectors. As an IGP, it needs no separate slot and no PCIe power cabling, making it suitable for compact portable systems. The 3 nm process node is more advanced than the 5 nm node used by AMD, and the Intel part has a higher boost clock at 2400 MHz compared to the AMD card's 2000 MHz boost. The Intel card's base clock of 300 MHz is far lower than the AMD card's 1900 MHz base, but boost behavior matters more for peak performance.

The AMD card's 88th percentile ranking against all GPUs in the database contrasts with the Intel card's 50th percentile, though the latter reflects no recorded benchmarks. The Intel part's FP16 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS exceeds its FP32 figure due to the 2:1 ratio, which could benefit mixed-precision workloads, but the absolute FP16 number still trails the AMD card's 27.65 TFLOPS.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.65 TFLOPS FP16, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD card has a 158 W TDP and needs a 1x 8-pin power connector with a 450 W suggested PSU. The Intel card has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors or suggested PSU.

Q: Are there benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B370. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rival entries.

Q: What is the form factor difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot discrete card using PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated GPU with an IGP slot width and bus interface.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by use case. For any workload requiring dedicated compute, large memory capacity, or high memory bandwidth, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only viable choice between these two, based on recorded specifications. Its 28 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The absence of recorded benchmarks for the Intel part means no measured performance can be attributed to it.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is positioned for a different environment entirely. Its 25 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and IGP form factor indicate a low-power integrated solution for portable devices. The 3 nm process node and 2400 MHz boost clock show a modern design focused on efficiency rather than absolute throughput. Its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 figures, while far below the AMD card, may be sufficient for lightweight graphics tasks in devices where discrete GPUs are not an option.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 should be selected when the workload demands dedicated VRAM, high bandwidth, and sustained compute throughput, and when the host system can supply 158 W and a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. The Intel Arc Pro B370 should be selected when integration, minimal power draw, and portability are the primary constraints, and when system shared memory is acceptable. The database contains no benchmark results for the Intel part, so any performance expectation for it must be inferred from its specification fields alone.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B370 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory Size | 28 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 224 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 3456 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 216 | 40 |

| ROPs | 96 | 20 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | 10 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 432.0 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 27.65 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 158 W | 25 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2024-10-02 | 2026-01-26 |

| Production Status | Not recorded | Active |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | HD Graphics-WM |