AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and neither GPU has an average benchmark score or a list of nearest rivals in the database. Both parts hold a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs, which indicates the database places them at the median of the overall distribution, but this rank is not derived from any measured performance data.

Without benchmark scores, the comparison must rely entirely on the specification sheets. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S computes FP32 at 47.84 TFLOPS, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile computes FP32 at 384.0 GFLOPS. The AMD part delivers roughly 124 times the raw floating-point throughput of the Intel part, a gap that dominates every other specification difference. In FP16, the AMD GPU also delivers 47.84 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel GPU delivers 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The AMD part still leads by a wide margin, though the Intel part's FP16 rate is double its FP32 rate, indicating a different arithmetic pipeline design.

Pixel throughput tells a similar story. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S reaches 373.8 GPixel/s, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile reaches 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture rate follows the same pattern: 747.5 GTexel/s for AMD versus 12.00 GTexel/s for Intel. These figures reflect the massive difference in execution resources, with the AMD GPU using 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, against the Intel GPU's 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs.

Memory bandwidth is another clear separator. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. No fixed bandwidth number exists for the Intel part, so the database treats it as an integrated solution sharing main memory. The AMD card's dedicated memory pool and high bandwidth place it in a different performance class entirely.

Clock speeds differ substantially as well. The AMD GPU runs at a base clock of 1660 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2920 MHz, with memory at 2518 MHz or 20.1 Gbps effective. The Intel GPU runs at a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with system shared memory. Even accounting for the architectural differences, the clock advantage on the AMD side is significant, though the Intel part's low clocks align with its 6 W power envelope.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S delivers 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The AMD part is approximately 124 times faster in this metric.

Q: What are the memory configurations of these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth both listed as system dependent.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S has a TDP of 300 W and requires a 700 W suggested power supply, with a dual-slot cooler and a single 16-pin power connector. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors or suggested PSU listed.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Q: Do these GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the release date for each product?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S was released on 2025-12-10, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S uses the Navi 48 chip built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip built on the Xe-LP architecture, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. These are fundamentally different GPU designs with different priorities.

The RDNA 4.0 architecture in the AMD part is a discrete GPU design with dedicated memory, a 256-bit memory bus, and a large execution engine. It includes 64 ray tracing cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely, as its ray tracing core count is null in the database. The AMD GPU also has no tensor cores listed, while the Intel part also has no tensor cores listed, so neither product emphasizes dedicated AI acceleration hardware in this specification sheet.

The Xe-LP architecture in the Intel part is designed for low-power integrated graphics. It uses a ring bus interface rather than a PCIe connection, and its memory subsystem is entirely system shared. The Intel GPU's FP16 rate is 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, meaning it can perform two half-precision operations per single-precision operation. The AMD GPU's FP16 rate matches its FP32 rate at 47.84 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating the same throughput for both precisions.

The process technology differs significantly. AMD uses a 4 nm node at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node at its own foundry. The AMD chip integrates 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. Intel's transistor count and die size are unknown, so no density comparison is possible from the recorded data.

The display output capabilities also differ. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. This reflects the AMD card's role as a standalone graphics card with fixed output options, versus the Intel part's role as an integrated GPU whose outputs depend on the host device.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile differ in nearly every recorded specification field.

Process node: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at Intel.

Transistors: AMD has 53,900 million, Intel is unknown.

Die size: AMD is 357 mm², Intel is unknown.

Base clock: AMD is 1660 MHz, Intel is 300 MHz.

Boost clock: AMD is 2920 MHz, Intel is 1000 MHz.

Game clock: AMD has 2350 MHz, Intel has no game clock listed.

Memory size: AMD has 32 GB of GDDR6, Intel uses system shared memory.

Memory bus width: AMD is 256 bit, Intel is system shared.

Memory bandwidth: AMD is 644.6 GB/s, Intel is system dependent.

Shading units: AMD has 4096, Intel has 192.

Texture mapping units: AMD has 256, Intel has 12.

Render output units: AMD has 128, Intel has 4.

Ray tracing cores: AMD has 64, Intel has none listed.

Pixel rate: AMD is 373.8 GPixel/s, Intel is 4.000 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: AMD is 747.5 GTexel/s, Intel is 12.00 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance: AMD is 47.84 TFLOPS, Intel is 384.0 GFLOPS.

FP16 performance: AMD is 47.84 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio, Intel is 768.0 GFLOPS with 2:1 ratio.

TDP: AMD is 300 W, Intel is 6 W.

Slot width: AMD is dual-slot, Intel is IGP.

Power connectors: AMD has 1x 16-pin, Intel has none.

Suggested PSU: AMD is 700 W, Intel has none.

Bus interface: AMD is PCIe 5.0 x16, Intel is ring bus.

Display outputs: AMD has 4x DisplayPort 2.1a, Intel is portable device dependent.

DirectX support: AMD is 12 Ultimate (12_2), Intel is 12 (12_1).

OpenGL support: Both are 4.6.

Vulkan support: Both are 1.4.

Dimensions: AMD is 267 mm long, 109 mm high, 39 mm wide. Intel has no dimensions listed.

Release date: AMD is 2025-12-10, Intel is 2024-12-31.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S wins in every measurable compute category. It has higher FP32 and FP16 throughput, higher pixel rate, higher texture rate, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, ray tracing cores, dedicated memory with higher bandwidth, and a much larger power envelope. The data indicates this is a discrete workstation-class GPU designed for heavy compute and rendering workloads. Its 32 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth support large datasets and high-resolution textures, while its 4096 shading units and 64 ray tracing cores handle complex scenes with ray-traced effects.

The AMD GPU also holds the advantage in connectivity and expandability. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides high bandwidth to the host system, and its 4x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs support multiple high-resolution displays. The dual-slot cooler and 300 W TDP indicate a card that requires substantial case airflow and power delivery, but the performance envelope justifies those requirements.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 6 W TDP is a fraction of the AMD card's 300 W TDP, making it suitable for portable devices with limited cooling and battery capacity. It uses system shared memory, which eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM and reduces cost and complexity in the host device. Its ring bus interface and IGP slot width indicate it is soldered to a motherboard or integrated into a system-on-chip design, not installed as a separate card.

The Intel part also has a release date advantage, having launched on 2024-12-31, nearly one year before the AMD card's 2025-12-10 release. However, the database does not record any benchmark scores for either product, so no performance-win count is available. The wins in this comparison are entirely specification-based.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S is the clear choice for any workload requiring maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity, or high-bandwidth rendering. The specification sheet shows it delivers 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 373.8 GPixel/s of pixel throughput, and 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also includes 64 ray tracing cores, which the Intel part lacks. The data indicates this GPU targets professional graphics, compute, and AI-adjacent tasks that demand a discrete card with robust power delivery and cooling.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is the appropriate choice for low-power, portable systems where battery life and thermal constraints take priority over raw performance. Its 6 W TDP and system shared memory make it suitable for notebooks and compact devices that do not need discrete graphics. The 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest but consistent with an integrated GPU in its class.

The database shows both products hold a 50th percentile rank among all GPUs, but this rank is not based on measured benchmark scores, as the benchmark arrays are empty for both parts. Any purchasing decision must therefore rely on the documented specifications. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700S targets users who need maximum performance and are willing to accommodate a 300 W TDP, a 700 W suggested PSU, and a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile targets users who need basic graphics acceleration in a 6 W envelope with no additional power connectors.

The release dates show the Intel part is older, with a 2024-12-31 launch versus the AMD card's 2025-12-10 launch. Both products remain active in production status. No successor or predecessor data is recorded for the Intel part, while the AMD card lists the Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor. The data does not include a launch MSRP for either product, so no price comparison is available.