AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has an average benchmark score of 23,315 across all recorded tests. This places it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits in the 50th percentile. No recorded performance data exists for this integrated part.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 by average score?

A: The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 M290X with an average score of 23,276 (0.2% difference), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23,273 (0.2% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23,250 (0.3% difference), and the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23,249 (0.3% difference). The R9700 leads all four by these margins.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700?

A: The launch MSRP is 1,299 USD. This figure is recorded in the database for the R9700 only; the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no launch MSRP listed.

Q: Which GPU has higher pixel rate?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 delivers 373.8 GPixel/s, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile manages 4.000 GPixel/s. The R9700 is substantially ahead in this fill-rate metric.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. The R9700 uses the Navi 48 chip built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. The Intel part uses the Twin Lake chip with the Xe-LP architecture, in the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation.

The R9700 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. This difference in process technology directly translates to the massive disparity in compute resources.

The AMD part carries 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. It also includes 64 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The shading unit count alone shows a 21.3x difference in parallel execution resources.

Memory architecture differs completely. The R9700 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses System Shared memory, with bus width and type also listed as System Shared, and bandwidth marked as System Dependent. This means the Intel GPU relies on the host system's memory subsystem, while the R9700 has dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM.

Clock behavior also diverges. The R9700 has a base clock of 1660 MHz, a boost clock of 2920 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Memory runs at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clock is noted as System Shared.

The R9700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The feature level difference in DirectX indicates the R9700 supports more advanced DX12 features.

Power and physical design diverge sharply. The R9700 has a TDP of 300 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 700 W power supply. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor), has no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The R9700 measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel part has no physical dimensions listed because it is integrated into a mobile processor package.

The R9700 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. Display outputs differ: the R9700 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the Intel part's outputs are Portable Device Dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the database for these two GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, making direct numerical comparison impossible. However, the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 has a full suite of benchmark results that can be examined independently.

The R9700 scores 7,006 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. In Geekbench OpenCL, it records 118,202 points, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it records 63,550 points. Passmark results show 155 in DirectX 10, 272 in DirectX 11, 83 in DirectX 12, and 363 in DirectX 9. The Passmark G2D score is 1,236, while the G3D score is 26,979. The Passmark GPU Compute score is 15,300.

The average benchmark score for the R9700 is 23,315. This places it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals all sit within 0.2% to 0.3% of this average score. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X trails by 0.2%, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M also trails by 0.2%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 trails by 0.3%, and the NVIDIA P106-100 trails by 0.3%.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, has no benchmark entries. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The database shows it in the 50th percentile, but without any actual scores, this percentile likely reflects its position among all GPUs based on incomplete data or its integrated nature.

The R9700's compute capabilities are substantial. It delivers 47.84 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 47.84 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part delivers 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The R9700 offers roughly 124.6x the FP32 throughput and 62.3x the FP16 throughput.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce this gap. The R9700 achieves 373.8 GPixel/s and 747.5 GTexel/s. The Intel part manages 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. The R9700 is 93.5x faster in pixel rate and 62.3x faster in texture rate.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field in the database.

Process and foundry: The R9700 uses 4 nm at TSMC. The Intel part uses 10 nm at Intel.

Transistors and die size: The R9700 has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die with 151.0M per mm² density. The Intel part lists unknown for both transistor count and die size.

Clocks: The R9700 has base 1660 MHz, boost 2920 MHz, game 2350 MHz, and memory 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The Intel part has base 300 MHz, boost 1000 MHz, no game clock, and memory marked System Shared.

Memory: The R9700 has 32 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus, 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part has System Shared size, type, and bus width, with System Dependent bandwidth.

Shading units: 4,096 vs 192.

TMUs: 256 vs 12.

ROPs: 128 vs 4.

RT cores: 64 vs none listed.

Pixel rate: 373.8 GPixel/s vs 4.000 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: 747.5 GTexel/s vs 12.00 GTexel/s.

FP32: 47.84 TFLOPS vs 384.0 GFLOPS.

FP16: 47.84 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: 300 W vs 6 W.

Slot width: Dual-slot vs IGP.

Power connectors: 1x 16-pin vs none.

Suggested PSU: 700 W vs none.

Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 vs Ring Bus.

Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a vs Portable Device Dependent.

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) vs 12 (12_1).

Dimensions: The R9700 is 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The Intel part has no dimensions listed.

Release dates: The R9700 released on 2025-07-22, while the Intel part released on 2024-12-31.

Predecessor: The R9700 lists Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor. The Intel part has no predecessor.

Launch MSRP: The R9700 has a launch MSRP of 1,299 USD. The Intel part has none.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a complete separation between these two products. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a high-end discrete workstation GPU with substantial compute resources, dedicated memory, and a full suite of benchmark scores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is a low-power integrated graphics solution with no recorded performance data.

The R9700's average benchmark score of 23,315 and 69th percentile ranking indicate it sits above most GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.2% to 0.3% of its average score, are older or midrange parts. This suggests the R9700's performance is competitive with, but not dramatically ahead of, those specific products.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average score of 0. The database cannot confirm any performance level for this part beyond its theoretical specifications. Its 50th percentile placement appears to be a placeholder given the absence of actual test data.

For users requiring dedicated graphics memory, the R9700 provides 32 GB of GDDR6 with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part shares system memory, making its performance dependent on the host platform. For compute-heavy workloads, the R9700's 47.84 TFLOPS FP32 and 64 ray tracing cores represent a vastly larger execution resource pool.

The power envelope difference is extreme. The R9700 requires 300 W and a 700 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part operates at 6 W with no additional power requirements. This makes the Intel part suitable for battery-powered mobile devices, while the R9700 requires a desktop-class power delivery system.

The physical design confirms this split. The R9700 is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, designed for installation in a desktop chassis. The Intel part is an IGP with no physical dimensions, integrated directly into a mobile processor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 wins in every measured performance category. It has higher pixel rate, texture rate, FP32 throughput, and FP16 throughput. It has more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and dedicated ray tracing cores. It has dedicated memory with higher bandwidth. It supports a higher DirectX feature level. Its bus interface, PCIe 5.0 x16, allows faster host communication than the Intel part's Ring Bus.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 6 W TDP allows operation in devices where a 300 W discrete card cannot exist. It requires no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no expansion slot. Its display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning it can be paired with whatever display hardware the host mobile device includes.

The R9700 is suited for workloads that demand maximum compute throughput: rendering, simulation, AI inference, and high-resolution content creation. Its 32 GB of GDDR6 memory supports large datasets and high-resolution textures. Its 64 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is suited for basic display output and light acceleration tasks in portable devices. Its 192 shading units and 12 TMUs can handle standard desktop compositing and video playback. Its system shared memory model simplifies the host platform design and reduces component count.

The release timeline shows the Intel part arrived first on 2024-12-31, with the R9700 following on 2025-07-22. The R9700 lists Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor, while the Intel part has no predecessor in the database. The R9700's production status is Active, and the Intel part's production status is also Active.

The absence of benchmark data for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile means the database cannot validate its real-world performance. The R9700, with 10 recorded benchmark scores, provides a complete performance profile. For any application requiring measurable graphics throughput, the R9700 is the only part with demonstrated results. For ultra-low-power mobile integration, the Intel part offers a path with no performance claims to verify.