AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Intel Arc 140V Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two GPUs. Neither the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D nor the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has any benchmark entries in the database, and the wins counter shows 0 for both sides. This means the comparison must rely entirely on the architectural and specification records.

What the data does show is a substantial performance-class gap. The AMD part delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel part delivers 3.994 TFLOPS. That places the AMD GPU at roughly 6.2 times the raw FP32 throughput of the Intel GPU, a difference that will dominate any compute-oriented workload.

The pixel and texture rate data confirms the same pattern. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D reaches 193.9 GPixel/s and 387.8 GTexel/s. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile reaches 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. The AMD card is roughly 3.1 times faster in both fill-rate metrics, which directly affects rasterization-heavy scenes and texture-bound rendering.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story. The AMD GPU uses a 256-bit bus with GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel GPU uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent," which in practical terms is limited by the host platform's memory subsystem. The fixed 576.0 GB/s figure versus a system-dependent figure is a decisive advantage for the AMD part in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

Neither part has any recorded benchmark scores, and both sit at the 50th percentile in the database's GPU ranking. The absence of measured results means the head-to-head picture is derived from the specification records, not from executed tests.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D records 24.82 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile records 3.994 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD part also achieves 24.82 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel part reaches 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Q: How do the memory systems differ?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, so its effective memory performance depends on the host system rather than a fixed specification.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a TDP of 150 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W and no suggested PSU, as it is an integrated GPU.

Q: Which GPU supports which graphics APIs?

A: Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. There is no difference in the recorded API support between the two.

Q: What is the release timeline for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile was released on 2024-09-23, and the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D was released on 2025-12-10. The AMD part is the later release.

Q: How do the physical form factors differ?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a single-slot discrete card measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 19 mm in width, with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no recorded dimensions or power connectors.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. The chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0M per mm².

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Lunar Lake chip built on the Xe2-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process, also at TSMC. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. Its transistor count is recorded as unknown, and its die size is 172 mm². No transistor density figure is recorded.

The compute unit organization differs meaningfully. The AMD GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. These counts scale roughly with the FP32 throughput difference.

The FP16 execution model differs. The AMD GPU executes FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning both formats run at 24.82 TFLOPS. The Intel GPU executes FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, reaching 7.987 TFLOPS while FP32 is 3.994 TFLOPS. This indicates the Intel architecture uses a packed FP16 path, while the AMD architecture treats FP16 and FP32 with equal throughput.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The AMD GPU is a discrete card with dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 256-bit memory bus, and fixed memory clocks of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel GPU is an integrated part that shares system memory, with no dedicated memory type, bus width, or bandwidth figure. The AMD part's memory clock is fixed at 2250 MHz; the Intel part's memory clock is listed as "System Shared."

The power delivery and cooling architecture also diverge. The AMD GPU has a 150 W TDP, is single-slot, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The Intel GPU has a 37 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connector, and no suggested PSU. The AMD GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface; the Intel GPU uses an IGP bus interface.

The display output configuration differs as well. The AMD card has one DisplayPort 2.1a output. The Intel integrated GPU's display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by the laptop or portable device it is integrated into.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture on a 4 nm process. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Lunar Lake chip with Xe2-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Clock speeds differ. The AMD GPU has a base clock of 1080 MHz, a boost clock of 2020 MHz, and a game clock of 1080 MHz. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz, with no recorded game clock.

Memory specifications diverge completely. The AMD GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel GPU has system shared memory, a system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

The compute resources differ by a factor of three in shading units: 3072 versus 1024. TMUs are 192 versus 64, ROPs are 96 versus 32, and ray tracing cores are 48 versus 8.

The pixel rate is 193.9 GPixel/s for AMD versus 62.40 GPixel/s for Intel. The texture rate is 387.8 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s. FP32 is 24.82 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS. FP16 is 24.82 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power consumption and form factor differ substantially. The AMD part has a 150 W TDP, is single-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The Intel part has a 37 W TDP and is an IGP with no power connector or PSU suggestion. The AMD card measures 241 mm by 111 mm by 19 mm; the Intel IGP has no recorded dimensions.

The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for AMD and IGP for Intel. The AMD card has one DisplayPort 2.1a output; the Intel part's display outputs are portable-device dependent. The release dates differ: the Intel GPU launched 2024-09-23, and the AMD GPU launched 2025-12-10.

The API support is identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a successor or a launch MSRP recorded. The AMD predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega; the Intel predecessor is HD Graphics-M.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear segmentation. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a discrete, high-power workstation card with 150 W TDP, dedicated 32 GB GDDR6 memory, and 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is a low-power integrated GPU with 37 W TDP, shared system memory, and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 compute.

The performance gap is consistent across every compute metric. The AMD part delivers roughly 6.2 times the FP32 throughput, 3.1 times the pixel rate, and 3.1 times the texture rate. The memory bandwidth advantage is even more structural: 576.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth versus a system-dependent figure.

The Intel part's advantages are in power and integration. Its 37 W TDP is a fraction of the AMD card's 150 W TDP. It requires no power connector, no PSU suggestion, and no physical card slot. It is designed to disappear into a portable device, with display outputs that depend on the host platform.

The release timeline shows the AMD part is the newer product, launching 2025-12-10 versus the Intel part's 2024-09-23. Neither GPU has recorded benchmark scores, so there is no measured performance data to refine the specification-based picture.

The recorded data indicates these GPUs target different segments entirely. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D belongs in a workstation with a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, a 450 W PSU, and a need for high compute throughput. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile belongs in a laptop where power draw and physical footprint are the primary constraints.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D wins in raw compute. Its 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.82 TFLOPS FP16 give it dominance in any workload that scales with shading throughput. The 48 ray tracing cores versus 8 provide a substantial advantage in ray-traced rendering, though no benchmark data records the exact magnitude.

The AMD part wins in memory-heavy workloads. The 32 GB GDDR6 pool with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed, dedicated resource. The Intel part's system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth cannot match this for large datasets or bandwidth-intensive rendering.

The AMD part wins in fill-rate-bound scenarios. Its 193.9 GPixel/s and 387.8 GTexel/s are roughly triple the Intel part's 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. This matters for high-resolution rasterization and texture-heavy scenes.

The AMD part wins in expansion and interface flexibility. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface and single DisplayPort 2.1a output make it a controllable, predictable component. The Intel part's IGP bus and portable-device-dependent outputs tie it to the host laptop.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins in power efficiency. Its 37 W TDP is less than a quarter of the AMD part's 150 W TDP. In a portable device, this difference determines battery life and thermal headroom.

The Intel part wins in physical integration. It is an IGP with no dimensions, no power connector, and no PSU requirement. It fits into systems where a 241 mm card cannot.

The Intel part wins in FP16 efficiency relative to its FP32 throughput. Its 2:1 ratio delivers 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 from a 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 base, indicating a packed execution path. The AMD part's 1:1 ratio means FP16 and FP32 run at the same rate.

The Intel part wins in release timing for early adoption. Its 2024-09-23 launch predates the AMD part's 2025-12-10 launch by over a year, making it the established product in the database's records.