AMD Radeon 8060S vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon 8060S has a full set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The LX MAX shows an average benchmark score of 0, and it holds no nearest rival entries in the database. This makes a direct numerical head-to-head impossible, but the available figures for the 8060S provide context for where it stands.

The AMD Radeon 8060S achieves an average benchmark score of 55757 across its tested workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result comes in at 2162. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 84626, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 80483. These results place it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating strong overall performance.

The nearest rivals for the 8060S further clarify its standing. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has an average score of 55698, putting the 8060S 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 averages 56083, meaning the 8060S trails it by 0.6%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, leaving the 8060S 1.7% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 averages 54247, with the 8060S leading by 2.8%. These margins are tight, showing the 8060S sits in a competitive band with some of the more powerful GPUs on the market.

The LX MAX, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile rank sits at 50, which is the midpoint, but with an average score of 0, this percentile appears to reflect an absence of data rather than measured performance. The database shows no wins for either product in head-to-head tests, simply because no head-to-head benchmark entries exist for this pairing.

What this means in practical terms: the 8060S has verified performance data and ranks among high-end GPUs, while the LX MAX has no measured results to compare. The LX MAX cannot be positioned relative to the 8060S using benchmark scores, because the database contains none for it. Any performance claims about the LX MAX would have to come from other sources, not from the recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs differ substantially in their underlying design, starting with the chip and architecture. The AMD Radeon 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 308 mm². The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its die size is not recorded.

The transistor counts for both are listed as unknown, so no comparison can be made there. The process node difference, 4 nm versus 6 nm, suggests the 8060S uses a more advanced manufacturing process, which typically allows for higher density and efficiency, though the database does not provide transistor density figures to confirm this.

Memory architecture presents a stark contrast. The 8060S uses system shared memory, with size, type, and bus width all listed as system shared, and bandwidth described as system dependent. This means it relies on the host system's memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The LX MAX, on the other hand, has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is listed at 2250 MHz, described as 18 Gbps effective. This dedicated memory configuration gives the LX MAX a clear advantage in memory bandwidth, assuming the system memory used by the 8060S cannot match those figures, though the database does not specify what system memory bandwidth the 8060S might achieve.

Compute resources also differ significantly. The 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It includes 40 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but its ray tracing core count is not recorded. The LX MAX has more than double the shading units, plus more TMUs and ROPs, which could indicate higher raw throughput in certain workloads, though the absence of benchmark data prevents confirmation.

Clock speeds are only partially recorded. The 8060S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clock listed. The memory clock for the LX MAX is 2250 MHz, while the 8060S memory clock is listed as system shared, meaning it depends on the host system.

Rates and floating-point performance show a mixed picture. The 8060S delivers a pixel rate of 185.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. So the LX MAX is slightly ahead in pixel throughput but behind in texture throughput. In FP32, the 8060S reaches 14.85 TFLOPS, while the LX MAX reaches 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16, the 8060S again shows 14.85 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The LX MAX has a substantial lead in raw floating-point compute, both in FP32 and especially in FP16, where it more than triples the 8060S figure.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The 8060S has a TDP of 55 W, occupies an IGP slot width, and uses no power connectors, reflecting its integrated design. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, takes a dual-slot width, and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The 8060S is clearly designed for low-power, integrated use, while the LX MAX is a discrete, high-power card.

The bus interface also differs: the 8060S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs for the 8060S are listed as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by the host device. The LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 8060S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

The LX MAX has physical dimensions recorded: 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The 8060S has no dimensions listed, consistent with its integrated nature.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX MAX has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile rank is listed as 50, but this reflects the absence of measured data rather than a performance result.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8060S compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 8060S is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, and 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, based on average benchmark scores.

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The 8060S uses system shared memory, with its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The LX MAX has higher FP32 performance at 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to the 8060S at 14.85 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The 8060S has a TDP of 55 W and uses no power connectors. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 8060S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs, based solely on the recorded data:

• Chip: Strix Halo (8060S) versus 7G106 (LX MAX)
• Architecture: RDNA 3.5 (8060S) versus TrueGPU (LX MAX)
• Generation: Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) (8060S) versus 7G100 (LX MAX)
• Process node: 4 nm (8060S) versus 6 nm (LX MAX)
• Die size: 308 mm² (8060S) versus unknown (LX MAX)
• Base clock: 1295 MHz (8060S) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Boost clock: 2900 MHz (8060S) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Memory clock: System Shared (8060S) versus 2250 MHz (LX MAX)
• Memory size: System Shared (8060S) versus 12 GB (LX MAX)
• Memory type: System Shared (8060S) versus GDDR6 (LX MAX)
• Memory bus width: System Shared (8060S) versus 192 bit (LX MAX)
• Memory bandwidth: System Dependent (8060S) versus 432.0 GB/s (LX MAX)
• Shading units: 2560 (8060S) versus 6144 (LX MAX)
• TMUs: 160 (8060S) versus 192 (LX MAX)
• ROPs: 64 (8060S) versus 96 (LX MAX)
• Ray tracing cores: 40 (8060S) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Pixel rate: 185.6 GPixel/s (8060S) versus 192.0 GPixel/s (LX MAX)
• Texture rate: 464.0 GTexel/s (8060S) versus 384.0 GTexel/s (LX MAX)
• FP32: 14.85 TFLOPS (8060S) versus 24.58 TFLOPS (LX MAX)
• FP16: 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1) (8060S) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) (LX MAX)
• TDP: 55 W (8060S) versus 225 W (LX MAX)
• Slot width: IGP (8060S) versus Dual-slot (LX MAX)
• Power connectors: None (8060S) versus 1x 16-pin (LX MAX)
• Suggested PSU: none recorded (8060S) versus 550 W (LX MAX)
• Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 (8060S) versus PCIe 4.0 x16 (LX MAX)
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent (8060S) versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a (LX MAX)
• Vulkan version: 1.4 (8060S) versus 1.3 (LX MAX)
• Dimensions: none recorded (8060S) versus 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm (LX MAX)
• Release date: 2025-01-05 (8060S) versus 2026-03-16 (LX MAX)
• Predecessor: Polaris Mobile (8060S) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Benchmark scores: three recorded tests (8060S) versus none recorded (LX MAX)
• Percentile: 87 (8060S) versus 50 (LX MAX)
• Average benchmark score: 55757 (8060S) versus 0 (LX MAX)
• Nearest rivals: four listed (8060S) versus none listed (LX MAX)

The manufacturer field also differs: AMD for the 8060S, while the LX MAX manufacturer is listed as unknown.

The Verdict

The data presents a lopsided situation. The AMD Radeon 8060S has verified benchmark results, a percentile rank of 87, and an average score of 55757, placing it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and ahead of the RTX 4080 in average score. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark scores at all, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals in the database. From the recorded data alone, the 8060S is the only product with measurable performance.

That does not mean the LX MAX is without interest. Its specifications suggest a different design philosophy: 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. These figures exceed the 8060S in raw compute and memory bandwidth. But without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how those specifications translate into real-world performance. The LX MAX may be competitive or better in certain workloads, but the data does not demonstrate it.

The 8060S, by contrast, shows it can hold its own against established discrete GPUs. It is 0.1% ahead of the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and 1.7% ahead of the Radeon Pro W5700X, while trailing the RTX 5080 by only 0.6%. For an integrated GPU with a 55 W TDP, that is a notable result. The LX MAX, with its 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooler, occupies a different power and physical class entirely.

The choice between them, based strictly on the data, depends on what matters more: verified performance or stated specifications. The 8060S has the former. The LX MAX has the latter, plus a more conventional discrete GPU form factor with dedicated memory and dedicated display outputs. The database cannot rank the LX MAX against any other GPU because it has no scores. Any user relying on measured results would pick the 8060S. Any user willing to trust specifications without benchmark confirmation might consider the LX MAX, but the data provides no evidence of its actual performance.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the AMD Radeon 8060S wins in every category that involves measured performance. It has benchmark scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, Geekbench OpenCL, and Geekbench Vulkan. It holds an 87th percentile rank and an average score of 55757. It has nearest rivals that confirm its competitive position. The LX MAX has none of these, so in the database, the 8060S is the only product with demonstrated results.

The 8060S also wins on efficiency and integration. Its 55 W TDP, IGP slot width, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for compact or low-power systems. It uses PCIe 5.0 x16, has a smaller process node at 4 nm, and supports Vulkan 1.4. Its texture rate is higher at 464.0 GTexel/s, and it includes 40 ray tracing cores, which the LX MAX does not record.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on paper specifications that the database does not verify through benchmarks. It has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory versus the 8060S's system shared memory, with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has more shading units (6144 versus 2560), more TMUs (192 versus 160), more ROPs (96 versus 64), and higher FP32 and FP16 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS and 49.15 TFLOPS versus 14.85 TFLOPS and 14.85 TFLOPS). Its pixel rate is slightly higher at 192.0 GPixel/s. It also has a discrete dual-slot design with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and a 225 W TDP, which indicates a higher power envelope. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16 rather than PCIe 5.0, and its Vulkan support is 1.3 rather than 1.4.

In terms of use cases, the 8060S suits systems where low power consumption and integrated graphics are priorities, and where verified performance against discrete GPUs matters. The LX MAX suits scenarios where dedicated memory, high raw compute, and a conventional discrete card layout are desired, but the database contains no measurements to confirm how it performs in actual applications. The LX MAX has the higher specification sheet, while the 8060S has the higher recorded benchmark standing.