AMD Radeon 8060S vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8060S is the clear performance leader in every measurable category. The database records three benchmark results for the AMD part: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80483. Its average benchmark score sits at 55757, placing it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking is 50, which is the median, but this reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance. In direct terms, the AMD part wins all benchmark categories by default, as the Intel part has no recorded results to compare.

The AMD Radeon 8060S occupies a performance tier near the top of the database. Its average score of 55757 places it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which scores 55698. It also trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 by only 0.6% (that card averages 56083), while leading the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.7% (54828) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 by 2.8% (54247). These deltas are narrow, indicating that the 8060S competes with desktop-class discrete GPUs despite being an integrated processor graphics solution. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no rival data, so its position cannot be established relative to any other GPU.

For use cases, the AMD part is suited for workloads that stress DX12, OpenCL, and Vulkan APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2162 reflects a modern DX12 rasterization workload, while the Geekbench compute scores (84626 OpenCL, 80483 Vulkan) indicate strong general-purpose compute performance across two major API families. The Intel part has no recorded data to indicate any workload advantage. The only area where the Intel part might be considered differently is efficiency, given its lower thermal design power, but no performance-per-watt metric is recorded in the database. The data simply shows the AMD part as the sole provider of measurable graphics and compute performance.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundries and process nodes. The AMD Radeon 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The die size is 308 mm². The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured by Intel on a 3 nm process, with an unknown die size. The process node difference (4 nm vs 3 nm) is the most direct manufacturing distinction, though both are current-generation mobile-class designs.

The compute resources differ substantially. The AMD part has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has exactly double the shading units, four times the TMUs, and over three times the ROPs of the Intel part. Ray tracing core count is four times higher on the AMD side. Neither part lists tensor cores in the database.

Clock behavior also diverges significantly. The AMD Radeon 8060S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD part's base clock is over four times higher, and its boost clock is 500 MHz higher. This clock advantage compounds with the larger execution resource count, explaining the large performance gap.

Memory architecture is identical in description: both use System Shared memory with System Shared type, bus width, and bandwidth that is System Dependent. Neither has dedicated VRAM. The API support is also identical: both report DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are integrated graphics processors (IGP) with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The Intel part uses an IGP bus interface, while the AMD part uses PCIe 5.0 x16, reflecting different integration approaches despite both being IGP-class solutions.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, meaning no direct comparative test results exist between the AMD Radeon 8060S and the Intel Arc Pro B370. However, the AMD part's individual benchmark results provide reference points. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162 is the only recorded result for that test. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626 and Vulkan score of 80483 are likewise the only data points for those tests. The Intel part has no recorded scores for any test, so every head-to-head comparison defaults to the AMD part by absence of counter-data.

The AMD part's nearest rivals show where it sits in the broader market. The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 on average, a delta of 0.1% below the 8060S. The RTX 5080 scores 56083, a delta of -0.6% (meaning the 8060S is 0.6% below it). The Pro W5700X scores 54828, a delta of 1.7% (the 8060S is 1.7% above). The RTX 4080 scores 54247, a delta of 2.8% (the 8060S is 2.8% above). These deltas are all within 3 percentage points, indicating that the 8060S performs within a narrow band around these discrete cards.

The Intel part's percentile of 50 versus the AMD part's percentile of 87 is the starkest comparative figure. A 50th percentile ranking with no benchmark data is effectively a placeholder, whereas the 87th percentile is backed by three distinct test results. The AMD part's average benchmark score of 55757 is the only non-zero average in this comparison. The wins count is 0 for both parts in the head-to-head array, but that reflects a lack of direct tests rather than parity.

Specification Differences

The specification differences are extensive. The process node differs: 4 nm for AMD, 3 nm for Intel. The foundry differs: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. Die size is 308 mm² for AMD and unknown for Intel. Base clock is 1295 MHz for AMD versus 300 MHz for Intel. Boost clock is 2900 MHz for AMD versus 2400 MHz for Intel. Shading units are 2560 versus 1280. TMUs are 160 versus 40. ROPs are 64 versus 20. Ray tracing cores are 40 versus 10.

Pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s for AMD versus 48.00 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s for AMD versus 96.00 GTexel/s for Intel. FP32 throughput is 14.85 TFLOPS for AMD versus 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel. FP16 throughput differs in ratio: AMD achieves 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while Intel achieves 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The AMD FP16 number matches its FP32, while Intel's FP16 is double its FP32, indicating different shader execution models.

TDP is 55 W for AMD versus 25 W for Intel. The AMD part uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses IGP. Release dates differ: the AMD part is dated January 5, 2025, while the Intel part is dated January 26, 2026. The predecessor names differ: Polaris Mobile for AMD, HD Graphics-WM for Intel. Both are listed as Active production status with no launch MSRP recorded. Both have no dimensions listed, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. Both report the same API set and display output configuration.

The memory specifications are identical in every recorded field: System Shared size, type, bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth. Neither part has transistor count data. Neither has a successor listed.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8060S compare to the Intel Arc Pro B370 in raw performance?

A: The AMD part has recorded benchmark scores: 2162 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 84626 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 80483 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 55757. The Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores and an average of 0. The AMD part wins every measurable category.

Q: What is the difference in compute unit counts between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has double the shading units, four times the TMUs, more than three times the ROPs, and four times the ray tracing cores.

Q: How do their clock speeds differ?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD base clock is more than four times higher, and its boost clock is 500 MHz higher.

Q: What is the FP32 throughput difference?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S delivers 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD part offers roughly 2.4 times the FP32 throughput. For FP16, AMD achieves 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while Intel achieves 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8060S rank against other GPUs in the database?

A: It sits at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 55757 is 0.1% above the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698), 0.6% below the RTX 5080 (56083), 1.7% above the Pro W5700X (54828), and 2.8% above the RTX 4080 (54247).

Q: What are the power and integration differences?

A: The AMD part has a TDP of 55 W, while the Intel part has a TDP of 25 W. Both are integrated graphics processors with no power connectors. The AMD part uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface. The AMD part uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part uses a 3 nm Intel process.