Lisuan Tech LX MAX vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no head-to-head benchmark results between the Lisuan Tech LX MAX and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Neither unit has any individual benchmark entries, average scores, or rival comparison data in the database. Both cards sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 for each. The win tally is even at 0 wins apiece across all tested workloads.

This absence of measured results means the two products cannot be separated on raw performance data. What the database does confirm is that both share identical compute specifications. The shading unit count is 6144 for both, texture mapping units number 192 on each, and render output units stand at 96. Pixel throughput is 192.0 GPixel/s for both, texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s on each, and FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS for both cards. FP16 performance matches as well at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for each.

Memory bandwidth is also identical at 432.0 GB/s, driven by the same 192-bit bus width and 2250 MHz memory clock, which the database records as 18 Gbps effective. The only specification that differs between the two is memory capacity: the LX MAX carries 12 GB of GDDR6, while the LX PRO carries 24 GB of GDDR6. In the absence of benchmark deltas, the data indicates that any performance difference between these cards would stem from memory capacity effects rather than compute or memory speed differences.

Architecture Differences

Both the Lisuan Tech LX MAX and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO are built on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip. Both are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The database does not list transistor counts or die sizes for either chip.

The compute architecture is identical across both cards. Shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units match exactly: 6144, 192, and 96 respectively. Neither card lists dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores in the database. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Memory architecture differs only in capacity. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6. Both use a 192-bit memory bus, and both achieve 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock is the same for both at 2250 MHz, recorded as 18 Gbps effective.

Power and physical characteristics are shared. Both cards carry a 225 W TDP, use a dual-slot cooler, draw power through a single 16-pin connector, and recommend a 550 W power supply. Both connect via PCIe 4.0 x16. Dimensions match exactly: 248 mm length (9.8 inches), 118 mm height (4.6 inches), and 48 mm width (1.9 inches). Display outputs are identical at 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both cards are listed as Active in production status, with a release date of 2026-03-16.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary difference between the LX MAX and LX PRO?

A: The memory capacity. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6. All other recorded specifications, including compute units, clock speeds, bandwidth, and power draw, are identical.

Q: Do the two cards have different compute performance?

A: The database lists identical compute specifications. Both deliver 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate.

Q: Are the memory speeds different?

A: No. Both cards use GDDR6 at 2250 MHz, recorded as 18 Gbps effective, with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do the cards differ in power requirements?

A: No. Both have a 225 W TDP, use a single 16-pin power connector, and recommend a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: Both cards sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: Are the physical dimensions different?

A: No. Both cards measure 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, and both are dual-slot designs.

The Verdict

The data provides no basis for choosing one card over the other on measured performance. Both products share every recorded compute, memory speed, power, and physical specification. The sole differentiator is memory capacity: 12 GB on the LX MAX versus 24 GB on the LX PRO.

For workloads that fit within 12 GB, the LX MAX and LX PRO would perform identically according to the database, since compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and memory clock are the same. For workloads requiring more than 12 GB of memory footprint, the LX PRO is the only option of the two that can hold the data locally. The LX MAX would be limited by capacity, not by speed.

The 24 GB capacity of the LX PRO suggests it is positioned for tasks with larger memory residency requirements. The 12 GB capacity of the LX MAX indicates a lower memory ceiling for the same compute hardware. Both cards remain in Active production status, and both launched on the same date.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in exactly two recorded fields: chip identifier and memory size.

| Specification | Lisuan Tech LX MAX | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | 7G106 | 7G105 |

| Memory size | 12 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6 |

All other specifications match exactly: architecture (TrueGPU), generation (7G100), process node (6 nm, TSMC), memory type (GDDR6), memory clock (2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective), bus width (192 bit), bandwidth (432.0 GB/s), shading units (6144), TMUs (192), ROPs (96), pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s), texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s), FP32 (24.58 TFLOPS), FP16 (49.15 TFLOPS), TDP (225 W), slot width (Dual-slot), power connector (1x 16-pin), suggested PSU (550 W), bus interface (PCIe 4.0 x16), display outputs (4x DisplayPort 1.4a), APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3), dimensions (248 mm, 118 mm, 48 mm), production status (Active), and release date (2026-03-16).

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in scenarios where memory capacity determines feasibility. Workloads that require data sets larger than 12 GB can only run on the LX PRO, since its 24 GB GDDR6 pool can hold the full working set. The LX MAX cannot accommodate such workloads in local memory. In all other scenarios, the database shows no performance advantage for either card, as compute rates, memory bandwidth, and memory latency characteristics are identical.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in no recorded category. It has the same compute throughput, the same memory speed, the same power envelope, and the same physical footprint as the LX PRO, but offers half the memory capacity. Applications that fit within 12 GB would see equal performance from both cards. Applications that exceed 12 GB would see the LX MAX fail to run or require external memory handling, while the LX PRO runs natively.

The data also indicates both cards occupy the same market position, with identical percentiles and average scores. Neither card has any nearest rivals listed in the database. The LX MAX is suited to tasks with modest memory footprints where the extra capacity of the LX PRO offers no benefit. The LX PRO is suited to tasks with large memory footprints, where capacity is the deciding factor. No benchmark results exist to separate them on speed.