NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to the Lisuan Tech LX MAX in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average benchmark score of 35,435, placing it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: What are the memory specifications for both GPUs?

A: Both GPUs feature 12 GB of memory on a 192-bit bus. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GDDR7 at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, delivering 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is substantially higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS. The LX MAX also provides 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile manages 17.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W and uses no power connectors, consistent with an integrated GPU design. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has better API support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the LX MAX?

A: The LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. It is a dual-slot card. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no listed dimensions because it is an integrated GPU (IGP).

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture on the 7G106 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation, while the LX MAX belongs to the 7G100 generation.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile integrates 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The LX MAX has unknown transistor count and die size, so density cannot be calculated. The process node difference is minimal, but the architectural choices diverge sharply.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, features that are entirely absent from the LX MAX's specification sheet. The LX MAX has no listed RT or tensor core counts. This indicates the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is designed for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, while the LX MAX appears to focus on raw rasterization throughput.

The shading unit counts differ: the LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The LX MAX holds a small advantage in each category, which translates to higher theoretical pixel and texture rates. The LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile reaches 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture differs in type and speed but matches in capacity and bus width. Both use a 192-bit interface with 12 GB of memory. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses faster GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX MAX uses GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s. The bandwidth gap is significant: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 55.6% more memory bandwidth.

The bus interface also differs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The display outputs reflect their form factors: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is portable-device dependent, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile across nine tests, while the LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores. The head-to-head comparison is therefore based on the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's absolute scores and its position relative to rival GPUs, not direct simultaneous testing.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves its highest score in Geekbench OpenCL with 143,870 points. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 139,213, showing strong compute performance across both major API frameworks. In PassMark tests, the G3D score of 24,004 is the most representative of overall gaming performance, while the GPU compute score of 10,101 indicates solid general-purpose compute capabilities.

The PassMark DirectX legacy tests show lower scores: DirectX 9 delivers 259, DirectX 10 delivers 151, DirectX 11 delivers 237, and DirectX 12 delivers 102. These lower scores reflect the age of those API paths rather than the GPU's actual capability. The PassMark G2D score of 981 covers 2D graphics operations.

The average benchmark score of 35,435 places the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in the 80th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals provide context. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 scores 35,520, which is 0.2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The AMD Radeon Pro Duo scores 35,860, 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA T1000 scores 36,289, 2.4% higher. The NVIDIA A2 scores 34,690, which is 2.1% lower.

The data indicates the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in a competitive band with these professional and workstation GPUs. The spread among the nearest rivals is narrow, ranging from 34,690 to 36,289, a difference of roughly 4.6% from lowest to highest. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile falls slightly below the midpoint of this cluster, but the margins are small enough to be within normal benchmark variance.

The LX MAX has no benchmark entries in the database, making direct numerical comparison impossible. Its theoretical specifications suggest higher raw compute throughput, but no measured results exist to confirm real-world performance. The percentile ranking of 50 for the LX MAX is a default position, not a reflection of measured data.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The process node differs: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 5 nm, the LX MAX uses 6 nm. Transistor count is 31,100 million for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and unknown for the LX MAX. Die size is 263 mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and unknown for the LX MAX.

Clock speeds present a stark contrast. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. The LX MAX has no listed base or boost clocks. Memory clocks differ: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory bandwidth favors the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 672.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX MAX. Both use 12 GB of memory on a 192-bit bus, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GDDR7 while the LX MAX uses GDDR6. The compute units favor the LX MAX: 6,144 shading units versus 5,888, 192 TMUs versus 184, and 96 ROPs versus 80. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores; the LX MAX has neither.

Pixel rate favors the LX MAX at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s. Texture rate also favors the LX MAX at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput favors the LX MAX at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput shows the largest gap: the LX MAX delivers 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 17.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Power consumption differs dramatically. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Form factors differ: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no dimensions, while the LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm.

Bus interface favors the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile with PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device dependent for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is similar, with the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supporting Vulkan 1.4 and the LX MAX supporting Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in areas related to bandwidth, connectivity, and feature support. Its 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 55.6% higher than the LX MAX's 432.0 GB/s, which benefits memory-intensive workloads such as high-resolution textures and large dataset processing. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface doubles the bandwidth available for data transfer compared to the LX MAX's PCIe 4.0 x16, reducing bottlenecks in CPU-to-GPU communication.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also wins on power efficiency. Its 60 W TDP is 73.3% lower than the LX MAX's 225 W, making it suitable for portable devices where power budget is constrained. The integrated form factor with no power connectors simplifies system design. The presence of 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores gives the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference that the LX MAX cannot match.

The LX MAX wins on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is 44.2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is 188.4% higher. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 65.8% higher, and the texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 44.3% higher. These advantages indicate the LX MAX is designed for workloads that prioritize raw shader throughput over memory bandwidth or specialized acceleration.

The LX MAX also wins on rasterization resources. Its 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs all exceed the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's counts. In traditional rasterization scenarios where ray tracing is not used, these resources translate directly to higher frame rates. The LX MAX's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-display configurations, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile depends on the host device's outputs.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has measured benchmark data confirming its performance level. The LX MAX has no measured data, so its theoretical advantages remain unverified in the database. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 80th percentile ranking and average score of 35,435 provide concrete evidence of its capability, while the LX MAX's 50th percentile default ranking offers no such confirmation.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between the two GPUs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a mobile-oriented GPU with measured performance in the 80th percentile, confirmed by nine benchmark tests and an average score of 35,435. It offers higher memory bandwidth, faster PCIe connectivity, hardware ray tracing, tensor cores, and dramatically lower power consumption at 60 W. Its nearest rivals, the Quadro GV100 and Radeon Pro Duo, score within 1.2% of its average, placing it in a competitive workstation-class band.

The LX MAX is a desktop-oriented GPU with no recorded benchmarks. Its specifications indicate high raw compute capability: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 192.0 GPixel/s, and 384.0 GTexel/s. It has more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. It also requires substantially more power at 225 W and uses a dual-slot form factor with a dedicated 16-pin connector.

For users who need ray tracing, AI acceleration, high memory bandwidth, or portable deployment, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the defensible choice. Its measured benchmark scores confirm it performs at a level comparable to professional GPUs like the Quadro GV100 and Radeon Pro Duo, with margins under 1.2%. Its 60 W power envelope makes it viable in systems where the LX MAX's 225 W requirement would be prohibitive.

For users who prioritize raw rasterization throughput and have the power budget to support it, the LX MAX presents compelling theoretical specifications. Its FP32 output is 44.2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, and its pixel rate is 65.8% higher. However, the absence of any benchmark data means these specifications remain unvalidated. The database shows no measured performance for the LX MAX, and its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder rather than a result.

The verdict depends on whether measured performance or theoretical specifications carry more weight. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's data is complete and verifiable. The LX MAX's data is absent. A buyer choosing the LX MAX would be relying on specification sheets alone, while a buyer choosing the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile would be relying on confirmed benchmark results. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only one of the two with performance evidence in the database.