AMD Radeon RX 7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The RX 7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile employs the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. These are distinct generations: the RX 7400 belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) family, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile comes from the GeForce 50 Mobile lineup.

Manufacturing processes differ significantly. The RX 7400 is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. This process advantage contributes to the NVIDIA part's higher transistor density: 118.3 million transistors per mm² versus 65.2 million per mm² for the AMD chip. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile packs 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, compared to the RX 7400's 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Core configurations reveal a substantial gap. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operations pipelines. The RX 7400 has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The NVIDIA chip also includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, while the AMD part has 28 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. This architectural divergence directly impacts compute workloads, with the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivering 17.04 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance (1:1 ratio), while the RX 7400 reaches 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

Memory subsystems differ in capacity and type. The RX 7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile comes with 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, more than double the AMD solution. Clock speeds tell a contrasting story: the RX 7400 boosts to 2300 MHz with a game clock of 2200 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile boosts to only 1447 MHz. The AMD card's higher clocks partially compensate for its smaller core count, but the memory bandwidth differential remains decisive.

Power and interface configurations also diverge. The RX 7400 has a 43 W TDP, uses a dual-slot form factor with one 6-pin power connector, and requires a 200 W suggested power supply. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile operates at a 60 W TDP, uses an IGP (integrated graphics processor) slot width with no power connectors, and lists no suggested PSU. The RX 7400 connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ as well: the RX 7400 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's outputs are portable device dependent.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is not a differentiator. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an active production status and was released on February 28, 2025, while the RX 7400's release date is August 7, 2025, with no production status listed. The NVIDIA part succeeds the GeForce 40 Mobile series, while the RX 7400 follows Navi II and precedes Navi IV.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw graphics performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates in 3D rendering. In Passmark G3D, it scores 24,004 versus the AMD Radeon RX 7400's 11,897, a 50.4% advantage. Its average benchmark score of 35,435 places it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile with an average score of 2,467.

Q: How do the two compare in compute workloads?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile leads Passmark GPU Compute with 10,101 points against the RX 7400's 5,152, representing a 49% gap. The NVIDIA card's 184 tensor cores and higher transistor count contribute to this advantage, though the RX 7400's FP16 throughput of 32.97 TFLOPS exceeds the NVIDIA's 17.04 TFLOPS in that specific metric.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA part provides 50% more capacity and 133% more bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has better legacy DirectX performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins all DirectX tests. It scores 259 in DirectX 9 (versus 176), 237 in DirectX 11 (versus 97), 151 in DirectX 10 (versus 59), and 102 in DirectX 12 (versus 44). The deltas range from 32% to 60.9% in NVIDIA's favor.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the AMD RX 7400 wins?

A: Yes, the RX 7400 wins the Passmark G2D test with a score of 1,209 versus the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 981, a 23.2% advantage. This indicates superior 2D graphics processing performance. The RX 7400 also has a higher pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s compared to 115.8 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA chip.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each GPU?

A: The RX 7400's closest competitor is the AMD Radeon 8040S with an average score of 2,440, just 1.1% behind, followed by the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% behind). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 35,520, which is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35,860, which is 1.2% ahead.

The Verdict

The benchmark data makes the hierarchy unambiguous. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins 6 of 7 head-to-head tests and holds an 80th percentile ranking across all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 wins only 1 test and sits at the 17th percentile. The average benchmark scores differ by an order of magnitude: 35,435 versus 2,467.

For users prioritizing 3D graphics, compute acceleration, or modern DirectX workloads, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear choice. Its Passmark G3D score of 24,004 is more than double the RX 7400's 11,897, and its compute score of 10,101 nearly doubles the AMD's 5,152. The NVIDIA part also offers superior memory capacity (12 GB versus 8 GB) and bandwidth (672.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s), which matters for texture-heavy applications and large datasets.

The RX 7400's advantages are narrower but real. It wins the 2D graphics benchmark with 1,209 points against 981, and its pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s exceeds the NVIDIA's 115.8 GPixel/s. Its higher clock speeds (2300 MHz boost versus 1447 MHz) and lower TDP (43 W versus 60 W) make it a more efficient option for basic display tasks. The RX 7400 also supports dual-slot mounting with a 6-pin connector, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses an IGP form factor with no power connectors, which may suit different system configurations.

Users who rely on 2D applications, spreadsheet work, or basic desktop rendering might find the RX 7400 adequate, especially given its lower power draw. However, anyone running modern 3D games, GPU-accelerated rendering, or compute-heavy workloads should select the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Its nearest rivals (Quadro GV100, Radeon Pro Duo, A2, T1000) all fall within 2.4% of its average score, confirming it competes at a professional tier, while the RX 7400's rivals (8040S, 710M, HD Graphics 610, GT 710M) are entry-level parts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1452 MHz | 847 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz | 1447 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 112 | 184 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 184 |

| Pixel Rate | 147.2 GPixel/s | 115.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 257.6 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 16.49 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 43 W | 60 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 200 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2025-02-28 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile secures decisive victories across most benchmarks. In Passmark DirectX 10, it scores 151 against the RX 7400's 59, a 60.9% advantage, the largest delta in the comparison. DirectX 11 shows a similar pattern: 237 versus 97, a 59.1% gap. DirectX 12 results are 102 versus 44, a 56.9% difference, while DirectX 9 yields 259 versus 176, a 32% margin.

The 3D graphics benchmark, Passmark G3D, is the most comprehensive test. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile records 24,004 points, while the RX 7400 manages 11,897. This 50.4% deficit for the AMD card reflects the combined effects of fewer shading units, lower memory bandwidth, and smaller transistor budget. Compute performance follows suit: the NVIDIA part scores 10,101 in Passmark GPU Compute versus 5,152, a 49% gap.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 claims one victory in the Passmark G2D test. Its score of 1,209 outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 981 by 23.2%. This result aligns with the RX 7400's higher pixel rate (147.2 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s) and suggests the AMD architecture handles 2D rasterization more efficiently despite its overall hardware disadvantage.

The average benchmark scores contextualize these results. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35,435 points, placing it at the 80th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, scores 35,520 (0.2% higher), while the AMD Radeon Pro Duo reaches 35,860 (1.2% higher). The RX 7400 averages 2,467 points, at the 17th percentile, with its closest rival, the AMD Radeon 8040S, scoring 2,440 (1.1% lower). These percentile positions confirm that the two GPUs serve entirely different performance tiers.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every 3D and compute scenario. Its Passmark G3D score of 24,004 positions it for modern gaming, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated applications. The DirectX 12 result of 102 (versus 44) indicates stronger support for current graphics APIs, while the DirectX 9 score of 259 (versus 176) shows backward compatibility. The compute score of 10,101 (versus 5,152) makes it suitable for machine learning inference, video encoding, and scientific workloads, aided by its 184 tensor cores. The 12 GB GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large textures and high-resolution assets.

The RX 7400 wins in 2D graphics, where its G2D score of 1,209 exceeds the NVIDIA's 981 by 23.2%. Its higher pixel rate (147.2 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s) and lower TDP (43 W versus 60 W) make it a practical choice for systems prioritizing energy efficiency and basic display output. The RX 7400's dual-slot form factor and 6-pin power connector suit desktop installations, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's IGP design targets portable devices. The AMD card's FP16 throughput of 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) exceeds the NVIDIA's 17.04 TFLOPS, which may benefit applications using half-precision arithmetic if software is optimized for RDNA 3.0.

The release timeline favors the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, which launched on February 28, 2025, versus the RX 7400's August 7, 2025. The NVIDIA part's active production status contrasts with the RX 7400's unspecified status, suggesting the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has broader availability. Users seeking a mobile-capable GPU with PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity and no external power requirement should select the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, while those needing a low-power desktop card with DisplayPort 2.1 outputs for 2D-centric workflows may find the RX 7400 adequate.