Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct benchmark scores for either the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 or the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both cards sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, and their average benchmark scores are zero. This means the recorded data does not yet include any synthetic or game-specific performance measurements for these two SKUs. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison must be built from architectural and specification deltas rather than measured frame rates or composite scores.

What the data does show is that both cards share identical compute resources. The LX 7G100 and LX ULTRA each use 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. Both deliver 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 with the 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 192.0 GPixel/s on both, and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The memory clock is identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The memory bus width is also the same at 192 bits, producing an identical bandwidth figure of 432.0 GB/s. In raw shader and rasterization terms, these two cards are twins.

The decisive difference lies in memory capacity. The LX 7G100 carries 12 GB of GDDR6, while the LX ULTRA carries 24 GB of GDDR6. This doubling of capacity does not alter peak bandwidth, but it changes how much data can reside locally before the GPU must reach out to system memory. For workloads that scale with allocation size, the ULTRA holds a clear theoretical advantage. For workloads that are bandwidth-bound or shader-bound, the two cards should behave nearly identically.

Power delivery differs slightly. Both cards are rated at 225 W TDP and both recommend a 550 W PSU, but the LX 7G100 uses a single 8-pin power connector while the LX ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector. The 16-pin connector on the ULTRA suggests a different power delivery path, although the TDP figure remains the same. Physical dimensions also diverge. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The LX ULTRA is shorter at 268 mm, lower at 112 mm, and slimmer at 40 mm. Both are dual-slot cards.

The release dates differ by three months. The LX ULTRA entered production status as Active on March 16, 2026. The LX 7G100 followed on June 17, 2026. Both use the TrueGPU architecture, the 7G100 generation, a 6 nm process from TSMC, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. Both output video through four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Since there are no benchmark numbers, the wins column stays at zero for both cards. The database does not assign a victory to either SKU in any recorded test. What remains is a specification-level comparison where the ULTRA's extra 12 GB of memory is the only substantive performance-relevant distinction.

The Verdict

The data does not support a performance verdict because no benchmark scores exist for either card. The LX 7G100 and LX ULTRA share identical shader counts, TMU counts, ROP counts, clock rates, fill rates, and memory bandwidth. In any test that does not exceed 12 GB of video memory usage, the two cards should produce effectively identical results. The 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 ceiling applies to both, and the 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate applies to both. There is no measured evidence that one card outruns the other in any workload.

The only decisive factor in the recorded data is memory capacity. The LX ULTRA doubles the frame buffer from 12 GB to 24 GB. This matters for applications that allocate more than 12 GB of video memory. The LX 7G100 cannot hold those working sets locally, forcing spills to system memory or outright failure to load. The LX ULTRA can accommodate them. That is the sole functional advantage the database confirms.

For buyers whose workloads stay under 12 GB, the LX 7G100 offers the same compute throughput, the same bandwidth, and the same feature set as the ULTRA. For workloads that exceed 12 GB, the LX ULTRA is the only option of the two. Neither card carries a launch MSRP in the database, so no cost-based guidance is available.

The production status of both cards is Active, meaning both are currently in the product stack. The LX ULTRA launched first in March 2026, and the LX 7G100 followed in June 2026. The newer card does not introduce any compute improvements over the older one. It merely ships with half the memory. The 16-pin power connector on the ULTRA and the 8-pin connector on the 7G100 do not change the 225 W TDP, so power supply requirements remain identical at 550 W.

The verdict from the data: choose the LX ULTRA only if the 24 GB frame buffer is necessary. Choose the LX 7G100 if the smaller physical footprint or the 8-pin connector matters more than memory capacity. From a pure performance standpoint, the database cannot distinguish them.

Where Each One Wins

The LX ULTRA wins in scenarios where video memory capacity is the binding constraint. With 24 GB of GDDR6, it can hold larger textures, bigger geometry caches, and more concurrently resident data. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth remains the same as the 7G100, so the ULTRA does not move data faster, but it can keep more of it on the GPU. This favors high-resolution texture packs, large dataset visualization, and workloads that preload substantial assets. The ULTRA also wins on physical compactness: at 268 mm length and 40 mm width, it fits into tighter chassis constraints than the 7G100's 294 mm length and 49 mm width.

The LX 7G100 wins in scenarios where the 12 GB frame buffer suffices. It delivers the same 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, the same 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and the same 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate as the ULTRA. It also uses a single 8-pin power connector, which may be more compatible with existing power supplies that lack a 16-pin cable. The 7G100's taller profile at 120 mm versus 112 mm is a minor consideration, but the extra height does not affect standard mounting. Both cards use PCIe 4.0 x16, so platform compatibility is identical.

For memory-bound workloads, the ULTRA is the clear pick. For compute-bound workloads that fit within 12 GB, the 7G100 matches the ULTRA's throughput exactly. Neither card holds a fill rate advantage, as both produce 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Neither card has a bandwidth advantage, as both top out at 432.0 GB/s. The 18 Gbps effective memory speed is identical.

The API support also matches: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 on both. Display output is identical at four DisplayPort 1.4a ports. The 6 nm TSMC process node is the same. The TrueGPU architecture is the same. The only wins recorded in the database are capacity-based for the ULTRA and compatibility-based for the 7G100.

FAQ

Q: Do the LX 7G100 and LX ULTRA have the same compute performance?

A: Yes, according to the database. Both cards use 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Both deliver 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s on both.

Q: What is the memory difference between the two cards?

A: The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6. Both use a 192-bit bus and achieve 432.0 GB/s bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Are the power requirements different?

A: Both cards have a 225 W TDP and require a 550 W PSU. The LX 7G100 uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the LX ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card is physically smaller?

A: The LX ULTRA is smaller. It measures 268 mm long, 112 mm high, and 40 mm wide. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs and display outputs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Both have four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and use PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Which card launched first?

A: The LX ULTRA became Active on March 16, 2026. The LX 7G100 became Active on June 17, 2026. Both use the 6 nm TSMC process and the TrueGPU architecture.

Architecture Differences

The LX 7G100 and LX ULTRA share the same fundamental architecture: TrueGPU, generation 7G100, built on a 6 nm TSMC process. The database lists no codename for either. The chips differ in designation: the 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip, while the ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip. Despite the different chip labels, the functional block counts are identical.

Both cards feature 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS on both, and FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS with the 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate and texture fill rate are the same. There are no ray tracing cores or tensor cores listed for either card. The database does not record transistor counts or die sizes for either SKU.

The memory subsystem is where the architectures diverge. Both use GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, and both use a 192-bit bus. Bandwidth is identical at 432.0 GB/s. The ULTRA doubles the capacity to 24 GB, while the 7G100 stays at 12 GB. This capacity difference does not change the peak bandwidth, but it changes the maximum working set the GPU can hold.

Power architecture differs in the connector. The 7G100 uses a single 8-pin connector, while the ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector. Both are rated at 225 W TDP and both suggest a 550 W PSU. The slot width is dual-slot for both.

Physical design differs. The 7G100 is longer, taller, and wider: 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm. The ULTRA is more compact at 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm. Both cards use PCIe 4.0 x16 and output through four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

The release timeline places the ULTRA first at March 16, 2026, and the 7G100 second at June 17, 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a predecessor or successor recorded. API support is identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

The architecture summary: identical compute cores, identical clocks, identical bandwidth, identical feature set. The only architectural distinction is the memory capacity doubling on the ULTRA and the different power connector. The 7G106 chip in the 7G100 and the 7G105 chip in the ULTRA may have different internal layouts, but the database records no performance or feature differences beyond those already noted.