NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy very different positions in the recorded database. The NVIDIA part arrives with a full suite of measured specifications, a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 11,088 points, and a percentile ranking that places it exactly at the midpoint of all tracked GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its entry lists core architectural details, but the performance data is entirely absent. This comparison therefore relies on the documented specifications for the LX MAX and the single benchmark result for the NVIDIA card, with the caveat that the Lisuan part’s measured behavior remains unverified.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on what each card is documented to do. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q is the only one of the two with a recorded performance score. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 11,088 points, combined with a 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs, indicates that it sits in the middle of the database distribution. The nearest rivals confirm this positioning: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q scores identically at 11,088 points with a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon RX 550 trails by 0.1% with 11,075 points, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 0.4% behind with 11,047 points, and the AMD FirePro W4300 leads slightly by 1.2% with 11,225 points. These deltas are small, ranging from -1.2% to +0.4%, which means the NVIDIA card is effectively clustered with these four parts in the Steel Nomad test. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no such data, so no verdict on its measured performance can be drawn from the database.

For the LX MAX, the available facts are limited to its architecture and memory configuration. It uses a 6 nm process, 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, and a 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, which is documented but not tied to any benchmark outcome. The data does not allow a conclusion about whether this card can match the NVIDIA part in any workload. The only honest verdict is that the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has a verified baseline score, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX remains unmeasured. Users who require a tested GPU with a known Steel Nomad result should look at the NVIDIA card. Users considering the LX MAX must rely on its specification sheet alone, since no performance data exists in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q?

A: The database lists one result for this card: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 11,088 points. Its average benchmark score is also 11,088 points, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX MAX entry shows an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile versus all GPUs is listed as 50, but that value is not supported by any recorded test result.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals in the Steel Nomad test?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q at 11,088 points (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 550 at 11,075 points (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 11,047 points (0.4% slower), and the AMD FirePro W4300 at 11,225 points (1.2% faster). The differences are all within about 1.2%.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q uses 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for each card?

A: The NVIDIA card delivers 110.1 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The NVIDIA card also lists FP16 at 110.1 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the LX MAX lists FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Q: Which card has a higher power draw according to the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has a TDP of 300 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q uses the GB202 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated by TSMC, but on different nodes: the NVIDIA chip uses a 5 nm process, while the Lisuan chip uses a 6 nm process. The transistor count for the NVIDIA chip is documented at 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The Lisuan chip’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no density figure recorded.

The render output units differ substantially. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, while the Lisuan card lists no RT core or tensor core counts in the database, leaving those features unspecified. The pixel rate for the NVIDIA card is 439.3 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 1,720.6 GTexel/s. The Lisuan card achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. These figures reflect the larger scale of the NVIDIA chip, but without benchmark scores for the Lisuan part, the architectural advantage cannot be translated into measured performance.

API support also differs. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16 as its bus interface, while the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ as well: the NVIDIA card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, and the Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. These differences suggest the NVIDIA card is designed for newer display and interconnect standards, but the database does not include tests that measure the impact of these features.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded field. Memory capacity is 96 GB (GDDR7) for the NVIDIA card versus 12 GB (GDDR6) for the Lisuan card. The memory bus width is 512 bits versus 192 bits, and memory bandwidth is 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective for the NVIDIA card, and 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the Lisuan card. The NVIDIA card has base and boost clocks of 1590 MHz and 2288 MHz, respectively; the Lisuan card has no base or boost clock listed.

Shader resources differ: 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs for the NVIDIA card, versus 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs for the Lisuan card. The NVIDIA card has 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores; the Lisuan card has no recorded RT or tensor core counts. FP32 performance is 110.1 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card and 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan card. FP16 performance is 110.1 TFLOPS (1:1) for the NVIDIA card and 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Lisuan card. Pixel rate is 439.3 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,720.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical dimensions also differ. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 300 W and suggests a 700 W PSU; the Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W and suggests a 550 W PSU. Both are dual-slot and use a 1x 16-pin power connector. The NVIDIA card measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Lisuan card measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The NVIDIA card is shorter in height and width but longer overall. The release dates differ: the NVIDIA card was released on 2025-03-17, while the Lisuan card is dated 2026-03-16. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD, while the Lisuan card has no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and both winsA and winsB are 0. This means there is no direct test result that pits the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q against the Lisuan Tech LX MAX in any workload. The only benchmark score available belongs to the NVIDIA card: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 11,088 points. The Lisuan card has no scores to compare.

Given the absence of direct comparisons, the nearest rival data for the NVIDIA card provides the only benchmark context. In the Steel Nomad test, the NVIDIA card is effectively tied with its nearest rivals. The AMD FirePro W4300 leads by 1.2%, which is the largest delta in either direction. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q matches exactly. The AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER are 0.1% and 0.4% behind, respectively. These deltas indicate that the NVIDIA card’s performance in this test is not exceptional relative to these specific rivals; it sits in a tight cluster where the spread is under 2 percentage points.

For the Lisuan card, the specification sheet suggests a lower compute ceiling. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 22% of the NVIDIA card’s 110.1 TFLOPS, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is about 22% of the NVIDIA card’s 1,720.6 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is about 44% of the NVIDIA card’s 439.3 GPixel/s. These ratios are derived from the recorded numbers, but they do not translate into benchmark scores because no test was run for the Lisuan card. The data cannot confirm whether the LX MAX would outperform, match, or fall short of the NVIDIA card in any specific application.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q wins on every measured or specified performance metric that has a value. It has a recorded benchmark score of 11,088 points, while the Lisuan card has none. It delivers higher FP32 (110.1 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS), higher FP16 (110.1 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS), higher pixel rate (439.3 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s), and higher texture rate (1,720.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s). Its memory subsystem is larger in capacity (96 GB versus 12 GB), wider in bus (512-bit versus 192-bit), and faster in bandwidth (1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s). It also uses a newer memory type (GDDR7 versus GDDR6) and supports a newer PCIe interface (5.0 x16 versus 4.0 x16) and newer DisplayPort standard (2.1b versus 1.4a). Its release date is earlier, and it has a documented launch MSRP of 8,565 USD.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on power efficiency as recorded. Its TDP is 225 W versus 300 W for the NVIDIA card, and its suggested PSU is 550 W versus 700 W. This means the Lisuan card draws less power according to the specification sheet, which could be relevant for systems with lower power budgets. Its physical dimensions are also different: it is shorter in length (248 mm versus 267 mm) but taller (118 mm versus 111 mm) and wider (48 mm versus 40 mm). The Lisuan card has no RT core or tensor core counts listed, while the NVIDIA card includes 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, so the Lisuan card cannot claim any advantage in those areas based on the data. The Lisuan card’s FP16 ratio is 2:1, producing 49.15 TFLOPS, which is higher than its FP32 figure, but still lower than the NVIDIA card’s FP16 output.

The database shows no benchmark wins for either card because no head-to-head tests exist. The NVIDIA card has one verified performance data point; the Lisuan card has none. In use-case terms, the NVIDIA card is the only option with any measured evidence of performance, and its Steel Nomad score places it in the middle of the database distribution, close to several older or lower-end parts. The Lisuan card’s specifications suggest a lower compute and memory ceiling, but without benchmark data, any claim about its real-world advantage beyond lower power draw remains unsupported. The data does not permit a recommendation for the Lisuan card in any workload, nor does it confirm that the NVIDIA card excels beyond its nearest rivals. The recorded facts simply show one card with a tested score and another with only a specification sheet.