NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation or the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Both GPUs show an average benchmark score of zero, and the head-to-head benchmark matrix is empty. The percentile ranking for both parts sits at exactly 50, indicating the median position among all GPUs tracked in the database, but this figure carries limited interpretive weight without raw performance data to anchor it.

What the recorded data does reveal is a near parity in raw compute throughput. The NVIDIA part delivers 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX produces 24.58 TFLOPS. The difference amounts to 0.14 TFLOPS, roughly a 0.6% gap in favor of the NVIDIA GPU. In practical terms, this places both products in the same performance class for single-precision workloads. The texture fill rates tell a similar story: the RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation achieves 386.3 GTexel/s, and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX reaches 384.0 GTexel/s, a spread of only 2.3 GTexel/s.

The pixel throughput metrics, however, diverge more noticeably. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX records a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 44% higher than the NVIDIA part's 133.2 GPixel/s. This gap stems from the Lisuan card's 96 raster operation units (ROPs) compared to 80 on the NVIDIA GPU. For workloads that stress fill-rate-limited rasterization, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX holds a clear advantage.

FP16 performance introduces another distinction. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation sustains 24.72 TFLOPS in half-precision, matching its FP32 output at a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX doubles its FP32 throughput in FP16 mode, reaching 49.15 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. This means the Lisuan part offers roughly double the half-precision compute capacity of the NVIDIA GPU, a factor that could matter for AI inference or certain scientific workloads that leverage FP16 arithmetic.

Memory configurations are identical across both cards. Each carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate for both. Neither card gains a bandwidth advantage over the other.

# Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins decisively in pixel throughput. Its 192.0 GPixel/s versus 133.2 GPixel/s represents a 44% advantage, driven by 96 ROPs against 80. This suggests the Lisuan card is better suited for traditional rasterization-heavy scenes, high-resolution framebuffer fills, and workloads where output pixel count dominates.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also wins in FP16 compute. At 49.15 TFLOPS, it doubles the NVIDIA part's 24.72 TFLOPS FP16 throughput. Applications that rely on reduced-precision arithmetic, including many machine learning inference stacks and certain image processing pipelines, would see materially higher throughput on the Lisuan card.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation wins in FP32 compute by a slender margin. Its 24.72 TFLOPS edges out 24.58 TFLOPS, a 0.6% advantage. The NVIDIA GPU also leads slightly in texture fill rate at 386.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 0.6% gap. Neither difference is large enough to dominate real-world workloads, but the NVIDIA part does hold a measurable edge in single-precision and texturing tasks.

The NVIDIA GPU additionally carries dedicated ray tracing cores, with 58 RT cores listed, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX shows no RT core count in the database. For ray-traced rendering workloads, the NVIDIA architecture provides dedicated hardware that the Lisuan part lacks or does not disclose. Similarly, the NVIDIA GPU includes 232 tensor cores, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no tensor core count recorded. This gives NVIDIA a structural advantage in tensor-accelerated operations, even though the Lisuan card's raw FP16 throughput is higher.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation consumes 110 W of power, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX draws 225 W. The Lisuan card also requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and lists a suggested power supply of 550 W. The NVIDIA part uses no external power connectors and fits an IGP slot width, whereas the Lisuan card occupies a dual-slot form factor. The NVIDIA GPU delivers comparable FP32 and texture performance at roughly half the power envelope, making it the efficiency leader in this comparison.

# Architecture Differences

The two GPUs stem from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip built on the "TrueGPU" architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 6 nm node. The NVIDIA chip integrates 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan chip's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The NVIDIA part belongs to the GeForce 40-series and the Ada-MW generation, with a predecessor in the Ampere-MW line and a successor in Blackwell-MW. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX belongs to the 7G100 generation and lists no predecessor or successor in the database. The NVIDIA GPU was released on 2023-03-20, while the Lisuan card carries a release date of 2026-03-16.

Shader resource allocation differs between the two. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation has 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA part has 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, while the Lisuan card's RT and tensor core counts are absent from the database. The NVIDIA GPU's higher shader and TMU counts explain its slight FP32 and texture rate advantages, while the Lisuan card's larger ROP count drives its pixel throughput lead.

The NVIDIA part's FP16 execution runs at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning the same shader units handle both precisions without extra throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 2:1 FP16 ratio, effectively doubling half-precision throughput on the same hardware. This architectural choice suggests the Lisuan design prioritizes mixed-precision workloads, while the NVIDIA design maintains balanced throughput across precisions.

API support shows minor differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA GPU lists Vulkan 1.4 support, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA part's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," consistent with its mobile IGP form factor, while the Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Physical specifications diverge sharply. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is an integrated graphics processor with no slot width, no power connectors, and no listed dimensions. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a dual-slot add-in card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with a single 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested power supply.

# FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation delivers 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, slightly ahead of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS. The difference is approximately 0.6%.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support ray tracing?

A: The database records no ray tracing core count for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation includes 58 RT cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but dedicated RT hardware is only confirmed on the NVIDIA part.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: Both GPUs use 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock running at 18 Gbps effective. Memory performance is identical between the two.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation has a 110 W TDP and uses no external power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which GPU has better pixel fill rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 44% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation's 133.2 GPixel/s. This comes from the Lisuan card's 96 ROPs versus 80 on the NVIDIA part.

Q: Are the form factors compatible?

A: No. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is an IGP with no slot width, designed for portable devices. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm with a 16-pin power connector, intended for desktop installation.

# The Verdict

The recorded data shows two GPUs with nearly identical FP32 and texture performance but divergent strengths elsewhere. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX both deliver approximately 24.6 TFLOPS of single-precision compute and around 385 GTexel/s of texture throughput. Memory capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth match exactly at 12 GB GDDR6, 192-bit, and 432.0 GB/s.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on pixel throughput with a 44% advantage and on FP16 compute with a 100% advantage. Its 96 ROPs and 2:1 FP16 ratio provide measurable gains for fill-rate-limited rendering and half-precision workloads. However, this comes at 225 W power consumption, a dual-slot footprint, and a 550 W suggested power supply.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation wins on efficiency, drawing 110 W while matching the Lisuan card in FP32 and nearly matching it in texture rate. The NVIDIA part also includes 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, features absent from the Lisuan card's recorded specifications. Its Vulkan 1.4 support exceeds the Lisuan card's Vulkan 1.3.

The release timeline favors the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, dated 2026-03-16, while the NVIDIA GPU is dated 2023-03-20. The Lisuan card represents a newer product generation. Its 6 nm process node is slightly older than the NVIDIA part's 5 nm node, but the transistor count and die size for the Lisuan chip remain unknown.

The choice between these GPUs depends on workload priorities. For half-precision compute and pixel-heavy rasterization, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers superior throughput. For power-sensitive mobile deployments, ray-traced workloads, and tensor-accelerated operations, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation holds the structural advantage. The form factor distinction is decisive: the NVIDIA part is an integrated mobile GPU, while the Lisuan card is a desktop dual-slot add-in board. These are not interchangeable products; they serve different physical platforms.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | AD104 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Ada-MW | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 294 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 121.8M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Shading Units | 7424 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 232 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 58 | Not recorded |

| Tensor Cores | 232 | Not recorded |

| FP32 | 24.72 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 110 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | Not recorded | 248 mm |

| Height | Not recorded | 118 mm |

| Width | Not recorded | 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-03-20 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | Ampere-MW | Not recorded |

| Successor | Blackwell-MW | Not recorded |

Both cards share identical memory specifications: 12 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2250 MHz memory clock, 18 Gbps effective. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, and both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. Production status is listed as Active for both parts. Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP.