NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The RTX 5080 Mobile has ten recorded benchmark scores; the LX MAX has none. This absence of comparative data means any assessment of relative performance must rely on the recorded specifications and the RTX 5080 Mobile’s percentile placement.

The RTX 5080 Mobile sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 38,349. Its closest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (average score 38,299, a delta of 0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (average score 38,135, a delta of 0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A (average score 38,691, a delta of -0.9%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (average score 38,706, a delta of -0.9%). This clustering indicates that the RTX 5080 Mobile performs within a narrow band of these four GPUs, essentially matching them in aggregate benchmark output.

Within its own benchmark suite, the RTX 5080 Mobile shows notable strengths in specific tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 169,754 is the highest among its recorded results, followed closely by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 166,986. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952 provides a modern DirectX 12 workload result. Passmark results show a G3D score of 27,711, a GPU compute score of 12,134, and a G2D score of 1,095. The older DirectX tests show lower scores: DirectX 9 at 314, DirectX 11 at 253, DirectX 10 at 171, and DirectX 12 at 116. These results indicate that the GPU is far stronger in modern compute and graphics workloads than in legacy DirectX paths.

The LX MAX, with no benchmark scores recorded and an average benchmark score of 0, cannot be placed relative to the RTX 5080 Mobile in any workload. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs is a database-wide position, but without individual test data, that ranking carries no comparative weight against the RTX 5080 Mobile’s specific scores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in architecture, process, and design philosophy. The RTX 5080 Mobile uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on the TrueGPU architecture from Lisuan Tech, fabricated on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and no density figure is recorded.

The shader configuration differs substantially. The RTX 5080 Mobile has 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also includes 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, indicating a fundamentally different approach to acceleration for those workloads.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The RTX 5080 Mobile has a base clock of 975 MHz and a boost clock of 1,500 MHz. The LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks. The memory clocks differ: the RTX 5080 Mobile runs its memory at 1,750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the LX MAX runs at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The API support shows a split on Vulkan versions. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5080 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The bus interface differs as well, with the RTX 5080 Mobile using PCIe 5.0 x16 and the LX MAX using PCIe 4.0 x16.

Power and physical design are strongly contrasted. The RTX 5080 Mobile is an integrated GPU (IGP) with a 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and a slot width listed as IGP. The LX MAX is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested power supply of 550 W. Its dimensions are recorded as 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5080 Mobile’s outputs are portable device dependent, while the LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The memory subsystems are not equivalent. The RTX 5080 Mobile uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 5080 Mobile’s bandwidth advantage is more than double the LX MAX’s figure.

Compute rates show a mixed picture. The RTX 5080 Mobile delivers 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, higher than the RTX 5080 Mobile, and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, more than double. Pixel rates favor the LX MAX at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 144.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates favor the LX MAX at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 360.0 GTexel/s.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on use case, not a single overall winner. The RTX 5080 Mobile is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it at the 81st percentile with an average score of 38,349. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0, making its real-world performance unquantified in this database.

For users who require validated performance data, the RTX 5080 Mobile is the only choice with evidence. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and ray tracing and tensor core support make it suitable for modern DirectX 12 workloads and compute tasks that use those accelerators. Its 80 W TDP and integrated form factor fit portable devices, as reflected in its portable-device-dependent display outputs.

For users who prioritize raw FP32 and FP16 throughput on paper, the LX MAX shows higher figures: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 23.04 TFLOPS, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 23.04 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s also exceed the RTX 5080 Mobile’s 144.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX’s 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, and 550 W suggested power supply indicate a desktop-oriented card, and its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs confirm that positioning.

The RTX 5080 Mobile’s 81st percentile ranking versus the LX MAX’s 50th percentile is the only relative metric available, and it favors the NVIDIA part. However, the lack of shared benchmark tests means this percentile gap cannot be attributed to specific workloads. The verdict from the data is that the RTX 5080 Mobile is the validated performer with modern features, while the LX MAX offers higher theoretical compute ceilings but no measured results.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | unknown |

| Die size | 378 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 120.6M / mm² | null |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 7680 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 240 | 192 |

| ROPs | 96 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 60 | null |

| Tensor cores | 240 | null |

| Base clock | 975 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 1500 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 23.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 360.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 80 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 248 mm, 118 mm, 48 mm |

| Release date | 2025-04-01 | 2026-03-16 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile has 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 5080 Mobile’s figure is more than double the LX MAX’s.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support ray tracing?

A: The LX MAX lists no ray tracing cores in the database, while the RTX 5080 Mobile has 60 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX’s architecture, TrueGPU, does not record any ray tracing acceleration hardware.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38,349, based on ten recorded tests. The LX MAX has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, which is higher than the RTX 5080 Mobile’s 23.04 TFLOPS. The LX MAX also delivers 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, versus the RTX 5080 Mobile’s 23.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has an 80 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connectors, and requires no suggested PSU. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, uses one 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer PCIe interface?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 5080 Mobile also supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 Mobile wins in memory capacity and bandwidth, with 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivering 896.0 GB/s, versus the LX MAX’s 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s. It also wins on modern feature support: it has 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores, while the LX MAX has none. The RTX 5080 Mobile’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and Vulkan 1.4 support exceed the LX MAX’s PCIe 4.0 x16 and Vulkan 1.3. Its 81st percentile ranking with validated benchmark scores, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 169,754 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952, gives it a clear edge in measured performance. Its 80 W TDP and integrated form factor make it suitable for portable devices.

The LX MAX wins on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5080 Mobile’s 23.04 TFLOPS, and its FP16 figure of 49.15 TFLOPS is more than double. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s are both higher than the RTX 5080 Mobile’s 144.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX also has a higher memory clock at 2,250 MHz versus 1,750 MHz, though with a narrower 192-bit bus. Its dual-slot design, 225 W TDP, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs indicate a desktop-oriented configuration, and its 248 mm length fits standard tower cases.

The data shows no overlap in form factor or power class. The RTX 5080 Mobile is a low-power integrated solution for portable devices, while the LX MAX is a high-power discrete card for desktop systems. The recorded specifications suggest the LX MAX is designed for compute-heavy workloads that can use its higher FP16 throughput, while the RTX 5080 Mobile is built for a broader range of graphics and compute tasks with validated results across multiple benchmark suites.