NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database comparison places the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 against the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, but the recorded data reveals a fundamental asymmetry: the RTX 5070 has a full suite of ten benchmark results, while the LX MAX has none. The RTX 5070's average benchmark score stands at 40377, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs tracked. The LX MAX, by contrast, has an average score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, with no recorded test results to compare against. This means every head-to-head comparison defaults to the RTX 5070 by the absence of competing data, not by measured superiority in any specific workload.

The RTX 5070's individual benchmark results show a wide spread across different API tests. Its strongest showing is in PassMark G3D with a score of 29137, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 178923 and Geekbench OpenCL at 172660. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 5077. Compute workloads are represented by PassMark GPU Compute at 15787. Legacy DirectX tests show lower absolute numbers: PassMark DX11 scores 277, DX10 scores 180, DX9 scores 320, and DX12 scores 108. The 2D performance metric, PassMark G2D, records 1305.

Because the LX MAX has no benchmark entries, the database cannot compute win counts for either product. The winsA and winsB fields both read 0, confirming that no direct test-to-test comparison exists. What the data does show is that the RTX 5070's nearest rivals in average score are AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318, a 0.1% delta), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063, 0.8% delta), NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568, 2% delta), and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870, a -1.2% delta). These deltas indicate the RTX 5070 sits within a tight cluster, trailing the Radeon Pro 5300 by 1.2% while leading the RTX A500 Mobile by 2%. The LX MAX has no rival entries, leaving its competitive position undefined in the database.

# Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two cards is stark. The RTX 5070 uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX MAX employs a 7G106 chip under an architecture labeled TrueGPU, built on a 6 nm TSMC process. Both are active production parts, and both use TSMC as the foundry, but the process nodes differ by one step. The RTX 5070's transistor count is listed at 31,100 million with a die size of 263 mm², yielding a density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX MAX's transistor count and die size are both recorded as unknown, so no density figure can be derived.

Memory architecture diverges clearly. The RTX 5070 pairs 12 GB of GDDR7 with a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The LX MAX also has 12 GB and a 192-bit bus, but uses GDDR6 with a 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RTX 5070's bandwidth advantage is substantial: 672.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a gap of 240 GB/s. Both cards have identical shading unit counts (6144) and TMUs (192), but the ROP counts differ: the RTX 5070 has 80 ROPs, while the LX MAX has 96 ROPs. The LX MAX's higher ROP count does not translate into a pixel rate advantage, however. The RTX 5070 records 201.0 GPixel/s against the LX MAX's 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate also favors the RTX 5070 at 482.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware present another major divergence. The RTX 5070 includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The LX MAX lists no RT cores and no tensor cores, meaning the data shows no dedicated ray tracing or AI acceleration hardware for that card. FP32 compute favors the RTX 5070 at 30.87 TFLOPS, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16, the RTX 5070 maintains a 1:1 ratio at 30.87 TFLOPS, but the LX MAX achieves 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, giving it a higher peak half-precision throughput than the RTX 5070's FP32 figure.

Interface and output specifications differ as well. The RTX 5070 runs on PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: the RTX 5070 provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the LX MAX offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI. API support is close: both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 5070 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX is capped at Vulkan 1.3.

# Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the RTX 5070 wins in every measurable benchmark category because the LX MAX has no benchmark results to compare. More usefully, the RTX 5070's strengths can be mapped against its own nearest rivals and its architectural profile. The RTX 5070 leads its closest competitor, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, by 0.1% in average score, and it leads the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile by 2%. It trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by 1.2%. These deltas place the RTX 5070 in a narrow performance band around 40,000 average points.

The RTX 5070 wins on memory bandwidth, with 672.0 GB/s versus the LX MAX's 432.0 GB/s. That advantage should benefit bandwidth-sensitive workloads such as high-resolution texturing and compute kernels that stream large data sets. The RTX 5070 also wins on FP32 throughput (30.87 TFLOPS versus 24.58), pixel rate (201.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0), and texture rate (482.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0). It includes RT cores and tensor cores, which the LX MAX lacks entirely, making the RTX 5070 the only one of the two with dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations. Its PCIe 5.0 interface doubles the link generation of the LX MAX's PCIe 4.0, and its Vulkan 1.4 support is one revision newer than the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3.

The LX MAX wins on a few specific specification points. It has 96 ROPs versus the RTX 5070's 80, a 20% higher count. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5070's 30.87 TFLOPS, though only at a 2:1 ratio that implies the FP32 rate is halved when running FP16. The LX MAX also lists a lower TDP at 225 W versus 250 W, and a lower suggested PSU at 550 W versus 600 W. Its physical dimensions are larger: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, compared to the RTX 5070's 245 mm, 115 mm, and 40 mm. The LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which could suit multi-display setups that do not require HDMI. Its memory clock of 2250 MHz is higher than the RTX 5070's 1750 MHz, but the effective data rate is lower (18 Gbps versus 28 Gbps), and total bandwidth is lower.

# FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers 30.87 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The RTX 5070 leads by 6.29 TFLOPS.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the RTX 5070 and the LX MAX list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. Both also support OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 5070 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: Both cards have 12 GB of memory on a 192-bit bus. The RTX 5070 uses GDDR7 with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX MAX uses GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the LX MAX have ray tracing cores?

A: No, the database lists no RT cores for the LX MAX. The RTX 5070 has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, while the LX MAX has no entries for either type of core.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377 across ten tests. The LX MAX has an average benchmark score of 0 with no recorded tests.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The RTX 5070 records 201.0 GPixel/s, while the LX MAX records 192.0 GPixel/s. Despite the LX MAX having more ROPs (96 versus 80), the RTX 5070 has the higher pixel rate.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these cards?

A: The RTX 5070 has a TDP of 250 W with a suggested PSU of 600 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

# Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every hardware category except memory size, bus width, shading units, TMUs, DirectX version, OpenGL version, slot width, and power connector type. Both use 12 GB memory, a 192-bit bus, 6144 shading units, and 192 TMUs. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector.

Process node: the RTX 5070 uses 5 nm, the LX MAX uses 6 nm, both at TSMC. The RTX 5070's chip is GB205 with Blackwell 2.0 architecture; the LX MAX's chip is 7G106 with TrueGPU architecture and a 7G100 generation label. Transistor count and die size are known only for the RTX 5070 (31,100 million and 263 mm²). The LX MAX's transistor count and die size are unknown, and its transistor density is null.

Memory type: GDDR7 for the RTX 5070, GDDR6 for the LX MAX. Memory clock: 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Bandwidth: 672.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. ROPs: 80 versus 96. RT cores: 48 versus none. Tensor cores: 192 versus none. Pixel rate: 201.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 482.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 30.87 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: 250 W versus 225 W. Suggested PSU: 600 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan: 1.4 versus 1.3. Dimensions: the RTX 5070 is 245 mm long, 115 mm tall, and 40 mm wide; the LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. Release dates differ: the RTX 5070 was released on 2025-03-03, the LX MAX on 2026-03-16. The RTX 5070 has a listed launch MSRP of 549 USD; the LX MAX has no launch MSRP field. The RTX 5070 has a predecessor (GeForce 40) and successor (GeForce 60), while the LX MAX has neither.

# The Verdict

The data directs a clear verdict: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the only card with measured performance in this comparison. Its average benchmark score of 40377 and 82nd percentile ranking come from ten recorded tests spanning DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, 2D, and compute workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no percentile ranking beyond a baseline 50th percentile placeholder. Selecting between these two cards on benchmark evidence is therefore a decision between a fully characterized product and an unmeasured one.

Architecturally, the RTX 5070 offers dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which the LX MAX does not list at all. The RTX 5070 also provides higher FP32 throughput, higher memory bandwidth, higher pixel and texture rates, and a newer PCIe generation. Its GDDR7 memory delivers 672.0 GB/s, which is 240 GB/s higher than the LX MAX's GDDR6. The RTX 5070's Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX MAX's 1.3. In every measurable performance category, the RTX 5070 leads.

The LX MAX does hold advantages on paper in specific areas. Its 96 ROPs exceed the RTX 5070's 80, and its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is higher than the RTX 5070's 30.87 TFLOPS. It also draws 25 W less power and suggests a 550 W PSU rather than 600 W. Its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs may appeal to configurations that need multiple DisplayPort connections without HDMI. None of these advantages are validated by benchmark scores, because the database contains no LX MAX test results.

For a buyer who relies on measured performance, the RTX 5070 is the only defensible choice from the recorded data. It is a proven performer in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals within a 2% band, and it carries features like RT cores and tensor cores that the LX MAX does not document. For a buyer who prioritizes lower power draw, higher ROP count, or FP16 peak throughput, the LX MAX presents those specifications, but without benchmark confirmation, those figures carry no verified performance weight. The verdict from the database: the RTX 5070 is the benchmarked option, and the LX MAX remains an unverified alternative with no recorded scores to support any performance claim.