NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD107 chip, occupies a specific position in the database's performance distribution. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, using the TrueGPU architecture and 7G106 chip, presents a different configuration profile. The recorded benchmarks show the RTX 4060 has an average score of 17,639 across its test suite, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs tracked. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores, meaning its average score sits at zero and its percentile is 50. This absence of direct measurements makes a conventional head-to-head comparison based on database tests impossible. What the data does provide is a detailed look at the architectural and specification differences that define how each product is positioned.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The head-to-head test array is empty, and neither product records a win count in such comparisons. For the RTX 4060, the available benchmark data covers ten separate tests. Its strongest results include a PassMark G3D score of 19,545 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 95,057. The Vulkan score reaches 48,643, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 2,302. Compute performance through PassMark GPU Compute registers 9,213. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 236 for DirectX 9, 175 for DirectX 11, 103 for DirectX 10, and 76 for DirectX 12. The 2D test scores 1,037.

The LX MAX does not appear in any benchmark entries. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and the nearest rivals array is empty. This means the database holds no measured performance data for the LX MAX across any test. Without recorded scores, no direct comparison of frame rates, compute throughput, or API-specific performance can be made from the available information. The RTX 4060, by contrast, has a full set of measurements that place it among specific rival cards. Its average score of 17,639 sits within 0.2 percent of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which averages 17,666. The AMD Radeon 780M trails by 0.3 percent at 17,588, the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5 percent behind at 17,551, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7 percent behind at 17,509. These deltas indicate the RTX 4060 lands in a tightly packed cluster of comparable performers, with all four rivals within a one percent band.

The absence of LX MAX data prevents any numerical win analysis. The recorded wins field shows zero for both products, which reflects the empty head-to-head array rather than a tied outcome. The database simply lacks the measurements needed to declare a leader in any specific test. What can be stated is that the RTX 4060 has verified scores across multiple APIs, while the LX MAX has none. The LX MAX's percentile rating of 50 appears as a default positional value, not a result derived from actual testing, whereas the RTX 4060's 61st percentile comes from its recorded average.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 wins in every category where measurement exists, purely because it has data and the LX MAX does not. In the database, the RTX 4060 shows a DirectX 12 Ultimate API support with version 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its recorded scores confirm it executes workloads across these interfaces. The LX MAX also lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but its Vulkan support stops at version 1.3, one revision behind. That difference is a functional advantage for the RTX 4060 in Vulkan-based applications, but no benchmark confirms the real-world impact.

For compute tasks, the RTX 4060 delivers 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 15.11 TFLOPS for FP16 in a 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX more than doubles that FP32 figure at 24.58 TFLOPS and reaches 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16 in a 2:1 ratio. The LX MAX also carries a higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 118.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060, and a higher texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 236.2 GTexel/s. These raw throughput numbers suggest the LX MAX holds an advantage in compute-heavy and fill-rate-bound scenarios, but the lack of benchmark verification leaves that as an unmeasured assertion.

Memory capacity and bandwidth favor the LX MAX. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s. The LX MAX's memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the RTX 4060's memory runs at 2125 MHz with 17 Gbps effective. For tasks with large working sets or high memory throughput demands, the LX MAX has a structural edge. The RTX 4060 counters with ray tracing cores (24) and tensor cores (96), features the LX MAX does not list at all. The RTX 4060 also has a lower power draw, but power consumption is not a benchmark win category; it is a specification difference.

The Verdict

The data dictates a clear split. For any user or workload requiring verified performance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the only option with measured results. Its average benchmark score of 17,639, 61st percentile ranking, and full set of test scores across DirectX 9 through 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads provide concrete evidence of its capabilities. The LX MAX has no such evidence. Its zero average score and empty benchmark array mean the database cannot confirm it runs any test successfully. Choosing the LX MAX for performance-critical work would rely entirely on unverified specification claims.

For workloads defined by raw compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth, the LX MAX's specifications suggest it may outperform the RTX 4060. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 12 GB memory, 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are all larger numbers than the RTX 4060's equivalents. The pixel rate and texture rate also favor the LX MAX. However, these are theoretical maxima. No benchmark confirms the LX MAX achieves them in practice. The RTX 4060's verified scores show it delivers its 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth in real tests.

The RTX 4060 wins on software ecosystem evidence. It supports Vulkan 1.4, has ray tracing and tensor cores, and shows working performance across ten different benchmark tests. The LX MAX lists no ray tracing or tensor cores, supports Vulkan 1.3, and has no test results. For users who need ray tracing, the RTX 4060 is the only choice with hardware dedicated to it. For users who need confirmed compatibility across a range of APIs, the RTX 4060's benchmark history is the deciding factor. The LX MAX remains an unverified entry with higher nominal specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17,639 across its ten recorded tests. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has an average score of zero because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060's average score of 17,639 is 0.2 percent behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666), and 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588). It leads the AMD Radeon Pro 560 by 0.5 percent and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 by 0.7 percent.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the LX MAX support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the LX MAX. The RTX 4060 lists 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores.

Q: What is the FP32 compute throughput for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 delivers 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The LX MAX has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the RTX 4060 has a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its chip, AD107, contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process, also from TSMC, with the 7G106 chip. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure exists.

The RTX 4060 has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, giving it dedicated hardware for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, which are exactly double the RTX 4060's counts in each category. The LX MAX lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, so it lacks those specialized units entirely.

Memory architecture differs in capacity and width. The RTX 4060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. Clock speeds also differ: the RTX 4060 has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, while the LX MAX lists no base or boost clocks. Memory clocks show the LX MAX at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the RTX 4060 at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective).

API support is close but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 4060's FP16 performance is 1:1 with its FP32 at 15.11 TFLOPS, meaning it processes both at the same rate. The LX MAX's FP16 runs at a 2:1 ratio, reaching 49.15 TFLOPS compared to its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Specification Differences

The specification table shows clear divergences between the two products. The RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA, belongs to the GeForce 40-series, and uses the Ada Lovelace architecture. The LX MAX has an unknown manufacturer, no series designation, and uses the TrueGPU architecture. Process nodes differ: 5 nm for the RTX 4060 versus 6 nm for the LX MAX.

Memory specifications favor the LX MAX in every measured field. It has 12 GB versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s versus 272.0 GB/s. The LX MAX also has higher memory clock speeds at 2250 MHz versus 2125 MHz. Shader and texture units are double on the LX MAX: 6,144 shading units versus 3,072, 192 TMUs versus 96, and 96 ROPs versus 48. The RTX 4060 counters with 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, which the LX MAX does not list.

Rates and throughput differ substantially. The LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s versus 118.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060, and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 236.2 GTexel/s. FP32 computes at 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX MAX versus 15.11 TFLOPS for the RTX 4060. FP16 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS on the LX MAX versus 15.11 TFLOPS on the RTX 4060. Power and physical specifications also differ: the LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the RTX 4060 runs at 115 W with a 300 W suggested PSU. The LX MAX uses a 1x 16-pin connector, the RTX 4060 uses 1x 12-pin. Both are dual-slot cards, but the LX MAX is longer (248 mm versus 240 mm), taller (118 mm versus 111 mm), and thicker (48 mm versus 40 mm). The RTX 4060 has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface; the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 4060 is end-of-life with a release date of 2023-05-17 and a launch MSRP of 299 USD. The LX MAX is active with a release date of 2026-03-16 and no launch MSRP listed.