NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 delivers 22.06 TFLOPS. This gives the LX MAX roughly an 11% advantage in single-precision compute throughput. In FP16, the gap widens significantly: the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the RTX 4060 Ti delivers 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), making the LX MAX more than twice as fast in half-precision workloads.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX MAX holds a 50% advantage in memory capacity and a 50% advantage in bandwidth.

Q: How do the physical dimensions and power requirements compare?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 measures 240 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm, while the LX MAX measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 4060 Ti has a 160 W TDP and a suggested 450 W PSU, whereas the LX MAX has a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W PSU.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture units?

A: The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. The LX MAX leads by roughly 41% in shaders, 41% in TMUs, and doubles the ROP count.

Q: What are the rendering output capabilities of each card?

A: The LX MAX achieves a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 achieves 121.7 GPixel/s and 344.8 GTexel/s. The LX MAX is 58% faster in pixel fill and 11% faster in texture fill.

Q: Do both cards support the same API levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 4060 Ti also includes dedicated ray tracing cores (34) and tensor cores (136), which the LX MAX does not list.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture, built on a 6 nm TSMC process, with transistor count and die size not recorded in the database.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 arrives as part of the GeForce 40-series generation, following the GeForce 30 and preceding the GeForce 50. Its production status is end-of-life, with a release date of 2024-03-31 and a launch MSRP of 399 USD. The LX MAX belongs to the 7G100 generation, remains in active production, and carries no recorded launch MSRP.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 includes 34 dedicated ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features. The LX MAX lists no ray tracing or tensor core counts, indicating a different feature set. The RTX 4060 Ti also uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the available lane count for data transfer.

The FP16 ratio differs sharply between the two. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning both peak at 22.06 TFLOPS. The LX MAX runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling to 49.15 TFLOPS. This makes the LX MAX more oriented toward workloads that benefit from half-precision math.

Display outputs also differ. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, with no HDMI output listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct benchmark scores for either GPU, as both carry an average benchmark score of 0 and no entries in their benchmark arrays. The head-to-head benchmark list is also empty, and neither card records any wins. The percentile ranking for both against all GPUs is 50, placing them at the midpoint of the database distribution despite their differing specifications.

In the absence of measured benchmark results, the specification data provides the only comparative signal. The LX MAX holds the lead in raw compute: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 22.06 TFLOPS, a difference of 2.52 TFLOPS or about 11.4% higher. In FP16, the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, more than double the RTX 4060 Ti's 22.06 TFLOPS.

Memory bandwidth strongly favors the LX MAX. With 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s, the LX MAX moves 144.0 GB/s more data per second, a 50% advantage. Memory capacity also favors the LX MAX: 12 GB versus 8 GB, a 4 GB difference. These factors matter for high-resolution textures and large dataset workloads.

The LX MAX also leads in geometry and fill rate. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 70.3 GPixel/s higher than the RTX 4060 Ti's 121.7 GPixel/s, a 58% advantage. Texture rate comes in at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s, a 39.2 GTexel/s gap or about 11% higher.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 counters with its ray tracing and tensor core hardware, which the LX MAX does not list. The RTX 4060 Ti also posts a higher boost clock of 2535 MHz versus no recorded clock data for the LX MAX. The base clock of 2310 MHz likewise has no counterpart in the LX MAX's records.

Power efficiency favors the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. It delivers 22.06 TFLOPS at 160 W, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS at 225 W. The RTX 4060 Ti achieves 137.9 GFLOPS per watt, while the LX MAX achieves 109.2 GFLOPS per watt, a 26% efficiency gap.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct use profiles. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on raw compute, memory capacity, memory bandwidth, pixel fill, and texture fill. Its 12 GB frame buffer and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth make it the stronger candidate for workloads that stress memory throughput, such as large texture sets or high-resolution rendering. The 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 capability further positions it for half-precision compute tasks.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins on power efficiency, ray tracing hardware, tensor core support, Vulkan API level, and clock speed. Its 160 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU makes it the lower-power option. The 136 tensor cores and 34 RT cores enable hardware features that the LX MAX does not list, extending the RTX 4060 Ti into AI inference and ray-traced rendering workloads.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 also carries a launch MSRP of 399 USD, while the LX MAX has no recorded launch price. The RTX 4060 Ti comes from a known lineage with predecessor and successor models, whereas the LX MAX has no recorded predecessors or successors.

Neither card shows measured benchmark wins in the database. The specification comparison favors the LX MAX in most raw performance metrics, but the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 offers a wider feature set through its dedicated RT and tensor cores. Users prioritizing compute throughput and memory capacity should look to the LX MAX. Users needing ray tracing, tensor acceleration, or lower power draw should look to the RTX 4060 Ti AD104.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 294 mm² | unknown |

| Shading Units | 4352 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 136 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 34 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 136 | null |

| Base Clock | 2310 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | null |

| FP32 | 22.06 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Pixel Rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 160 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DP 1.4a | 4x DP 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 240 mm | 248 mm |

| Height | 111 mm | 118 mm |

| Width | 40 mm | 48 mm |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2024-03-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 399 USD | null |

Where Each One Wins

Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in: raw FP32 compute (24.58 TFLOPS vs 22.06 TFLOPS), FP16 compute (49.15 TFLOPS vs 22.06 TFLOPS), memory capacity (12 GB vs 8 GB), memory bandwidth (432.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s), pixel fill rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 121.7 GPixel/s), texture fill rate (384.0 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s), shading units (6144 vs 4352), texture units (192 vs 136), ROPs (96 vs 48), bus interface width (PCIe 4.0 x16 vs x8), and display output count (4x DisplayPort vs 1x HDMI plus 3x DisplayPort).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins in: power efficiency (22.06 TFLOPS at 160 W vs 24.58 TFLOPS at 225 W), ray tracing cores (34 vs none listed), tensor cores (136 vs none listed), clock speeds (2310 MHz base and 2535 MHz boost vs no recorded clocks), Vulkan API support (1.4 vs 1.3), smaller physical footprint (240 mm vs 248 mm length), lower power draw (160 W vs 225 W), lower suggested PSU (450 W vs 550 W), and documented production lineage with a predecessor and successor.