AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which GPU shows a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has an average benchmark score of 12710, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average of 0.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU compared to all GPUs in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT sits at the 52nd percentile, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, whereas the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a TDP of 160 W.

Q: Do both GPUs have the same memory configuration?

A: Yes, both feature 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is listed as Active production, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is listed as End-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits the two GPUs into very different usage cases. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is a mobile part with a full set of benchmark results, and it wins on raw compute throughput in several API tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no benchmark scores in the database, so it cannot claim any measured performance win. Instead, its advantages come from architectural specifications and feature set.

For the AMD part, the benchmark wins are clear across multiple test suites. In PassMark DirectX 9, it scores 175. In DirectX 10, it scores 76. In DirectX 11, it scores 137. In DirectX 12, it scores 58. The PassMark G3D score reaches 13907, and the GPU compute score is 7140. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows 2048. Geekbench OpenCL shows 74869, and Geekbench Vulkan shows 27793. These numbers give the RX 7600M XT a measurable footprint that the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 simply lacks in this database.

The NVIDIA part wins on paper in several specification categories. It uses a 5 nm process node versus the AMD part's 6 nm node. It packs 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, 34 RT cores, and 136 tensor cores. The AMD part has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 RT cores, with no tensor core count recorded. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 also carries a higher boost clock at 2535 MHz versus 2469 MHz, and a higher base clock at 2310 MHz versus 1280 MHz. It delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 versus 20.23 TFLOPS for the AMD part.

In practical terms, the AMD GPU wins in any scenario where measured benchmark scores are the deciding factor. The NVIDIA GPU wins in scenarios that depend on raw compute specifications, ray tracing hardware count, tensor core availability, and newer process technology. Since the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has zero recorded scores, the database cannot confirm any real-world performance advantage for it.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, meaning there are no direct comparative test scores between these two specific GPUs. However, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has its own benchmark records, and those can be compared against the nearest rivals listed for it. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals in the database.

Looking at the AMD part's nearest rivals gives context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 has an average score of 12773, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7600M XT's 12710. The NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm scores 12625, which is 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 scores 12830, which is 0.9% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 455 scores 12831, also 0.9% higher. These deltas are all within one percentage point, placing the RX 7600M XT in a tightly clustered performance band around the 12700 to 12800 average score range.

The biggest measured wins for the AMD part come from its individual benchmark entries. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74869 is the highest recorded value across all its tests. The PassMark G3D score of 13907 represents the strongest DirectX-oriented gaming aggregate. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 27793 shows a substantial compute workload result. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2048 provides a modern DirectX 12 gaming metric.

For the NVIDIA part, there are no scores to walk through. The database shows zero benchmark entries, zero wins, and zero head-to-head results. This means any comparison of measured performance between these two GPUs is one-sided: the AMD part has data, the NVIDIA part does not.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ substantially in their core configurations. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 4352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The NVIDIA part has more shading units and TMUs, while the AMD part has more ROPs.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD part has a base clock of 1280 MHz, a game clock of 2023 MHz, and a boost clock of 2469 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2535 MHz, with no game clock listed. The NVIDIA base clock is nearly double the AMD base clock, but the boost clocks are closer.

Memory is identical in capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit interface with 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock is also the same at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Power and physical design differ significantly. The AMD part has a TDP of 120 W, is an integrated graphics package (IGP), requires no power connectors, and has a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA part has a TDP of 160 W, is a dual-slot card, requires one 16-pin power connector, suggests a 450 W power supply, and uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The NVIDIA card has physical dimensions of 240 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width.

Display outputs differ as well. The AMD part lists "Portable Device Dependent" outputs, reflecting its mobile nature. The NVIDIA part lists 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The NVIDIA part has a launch MSRP of 399 USD. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 33 chip with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Transistor density is 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD104 chip. It belongs to the GeForce 40 series. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Transistor density is 121.8 million per square millimeter.

Ray tracing hardware differs. The AMD part has 32 RT cores, while the NVIDIA part has 34 RT cores. The NVIDIA part also includes 136 tensor cores, while the AMD part has no tensor core count recorded in the database.

Compute throughput figures show different strengths. The AMD part delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.06 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The AMD part has a higher FP16 throughput, while the NVIDIA part has higher FP32 throughput.

Pixel and texture rates also differ. The AMD part reaches 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part reaches 121.7 GPixel/s and 344.8 GTexel/s. The AMD part has a higher pixel rate, while the NVIDIA part has a higher texture rate.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part's predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, while the NVIDIA part's predecessor is GeForce 30 and its successor is GeForce 50. The AMD part has no listed successor. The NVIDIA part was released on 2024-03-31, while the AMD part was released on 2023-01-03.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split decision. For anyone relying on measured benchmark results, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is the only option with recorded performance. Its average score of 12710 places it in the 52nd percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within one percentage point of its average. The PassMark G3D score of 13907, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74869, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2048 provide concrete performance data across multiple APIs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no benchmark scores in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average score mean the database cannot verify any real-world performance for this part. However, its specifications show a different class of hardware. The 5 nm process node, 35,800 million transistors, 4352 shading units, 136 tensor cores, and 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 all point to a more densely packed and compute-heavy design. The 160 W TDP and dual-slot form factor with a 16-pin connector indicate a desktop-oriented card, while the AMD part's 120 W TDP and IGP form factor with no power connectors indicate a mobile solution.

The choice between them depends on what the data can support. For verified benchmark performance, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is the measured winner. For raw specification strength in shading units, tensor cores, process technology, and FP32 throughput, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 leads on paper. The AMD part also offers higher pixel rate and FP16 throughput, plus more ROPs. The NVIDIA part offers higher texture rate, more RT cores, and a longer list of desktop connectivity options. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 carries a 399 USD launch MSRP, while the RX 7600M XT has no recorded price. Both share identical memory configurations, so bandwidth is not a differentiator. The verdict is straightforward: the AMD part wins where measurements exist, and the NVIDIA part wins where specifications are the only available evidence.