NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is complicated by the fact that the database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results, and the LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The RTX 4060 Mobile, by contrast, has a full suite of measurements across multiple test suites. Its average benchmark score is 22,729, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The LX MAX carries a 50th percentile rating, but with an average score of zero, it remains an unmeasured entity.

The RTX 4060 Mobile’s recorded scores show a specific performance profile. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 89,420, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 89,569. Passmark results split by DirectX version show 216 in DirectX 9, 157 in DirectX 11, 107 in DirectX 10, and 73 in DirectX 12. The Passmark G3D score is 17,469, while the GPU compute score is 6,816. The 2D score is 730. These numbers indicate a card that delivers its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads, with lower scores in legacy rasterization tests.

The nearest rival data for the RTX 4060 Mobile provides context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 has an average score of 22,895, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 4060 Mobile. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22,549, 0.8% lower. The Intel Arc B580 scores 23,021, 1.3% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22,435, 1.3% lower. These deltas are all within 1.3 percentage points, which places the RTX 4060 Mobile in a tightly contested performance band. The data suggests that the RTX 4060 Mobile sits near parity with desktop cards from prior generations and current mid-range offerings.

Since the LX MAX has no benchmark entries, there are no wins to assign in either direction. The head-to-head tally shows zero wins for both products. This is not a case of one card clearly beating the other in recorded tests; it is a case where only one side has any data. The LX MAX’s specification sheet, however, contains figures that imply a much higher theoretical ceiling, but without measurement, those figures remain unverified in practice.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database contains zero benchmark entries for the LX MAX, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: What is the RTX 4060 Mobile’s average benchmark score and percentile rank?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22,729 and sits in the 67th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: How close is the RTX 4060 Mobile to its nearest rivals?

A: The closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with an average score of 22,895, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is 0.8% lower, the Intel Arc B580 is 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is 1.3% lower.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The LX MAX has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a 192-bit bus and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 256.0 GB/s with a 128-bit bus and 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: What is the power draw difference between the two?

A: The LX MAX is rated at 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. The RTX 4060 Mobile is rated at 115 W and has no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics package.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The LX MAX has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has 90.72 GPixel/s.

Q: Are both GPUs built on the same process node?

A: No. The RTX 4060 Mobile uses a 5 nm node, while the LX MAX uses a 6 nm node. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the RTX 4060 Mobile, but only because it has any data at all. With an average benchmark score of 22,729, a 67th percentile ranking, and a full suite of DirectX and compute results, it is a measurable, active product. Its nearest rivals, all within 1.3% of its average score, confirm that it performs at a competitive level against established desktop and mobile GPUs.

The LX MAX, however, presents a specification sheet that, if realized in practice, would place it in a different performance class. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than double the RTX 4060 Mobile’s 11.61 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 181.4 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 90.72 GPixel/s, suggest a much larger silicon. Its 12 GB memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth outclasses the RTX 4060 Mobile’s 8 GB and 256.0 GB/s. But none of this is confirmed by benchmark results.

For a buyer or analyst relying strictly on measured data, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the only option with verified performance. For anyone willing to consider unverified specifications, the LX MAX promises more raw throughput, but the database cannot confirm that promise. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RTX 4060 Mobile is the proven performer, while the LX MAX is an unmeasured unknown with a high theoretical ceiling.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4060 Mobile uses the AD107 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with 18,900 million transistors and a die size of 159 mm². The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process with unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock speeds also diverge. The RTX 4060 Mobile has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 4060 Mobile runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is a major split. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Shader resources are heavily skewed toward the LX MAX. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The LX MAX also has higher pixel and texture rates, as noted earlier.

Power and physical design differ. The RTX 4060 Mobile is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with no power connectors and a 115 W TDP. The LX MAX is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector, a 225 W TDP, and a suggested 550 W power supply. The LX MAX has explicit dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The RTX 4060 Mobile has no listed dimensions.

The bus interface also differs: the RTX 4060 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent for the RTX 4060 Mobile, while the LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4060 Mobile is built on NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40-series and the GeForce 40 Mobile generation. It includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which support hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration. Its FP16 performance is 11.61 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The LX MAX uses an architecture called TrueGPU, part of the 7G100 generation. It has no listed RT cores or tensor cores, so ray tracing and tensor acceleration are not specified. Its FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, which means it can process FP16 at twice the rate of FP32. This suggests a design optimized for mixed-precision workloads. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, one minor version behind the RTX 4060 Mobile in Vulkan support.

The transistor density for the RTX 4060 Mobile is 118.9M per mm². The LX MAX has no transistor density listed. The RTX 4060 Mobile has a predecessor in the GeForce 30 Mobile series and a successor in the GeForce 50 Mobile series. The LX MAX has no listed predecessor or successor, and its manufacturer is marked as Unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins in verified performance, portability, and efficiency. It has a 115 W TDP and no power connectors, making it suitable for thin, integrated designs. Its 67th percentile ranking and average score of 22,729 are backed by actual benchmark results. Its nearest rivals, all within 1.3% of its score, show that it competes effectively in the mid-range segment. Its 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores give it explicit ray tracing and AI capabilities, which the LX MAX does not specify.

The LX MAX wins in raw specification density. It has double the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs of the RTX 4060 Mobile. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 11.61 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 11.61 TFLOPS. Its memory subsystem is larger and faster: 12 GB, 192-bit, and 432.0 GB/s versus 8 GB, 128-bit, and 256.0 GB/s. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 90.72 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 181.4 GTexel/s. These figures suggest a GPU built for high-throughput compute and high-resolution rendering, assuming the silicon performs as specified.

The use-case split is clear from the data. For portable laptops, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the only viable choice, given its IGP form factor and lower power draw. For desktop towers with a 550 W power supply and a dual-slot card, the LX MAX offers a larger memory pool, wider bus, and more raw compute. But the absence of benchmark results for the LX MAX means that any advantage is theoretical. Buyers who require verified numbers should look to the RTX 4060 Mobile. Buyers who are willing to trust an unmeasured specification sheet may find the LX MAX appealing, but the database cannot confirm its real-world behavior.