NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a single recorded performance measurement for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831. This result places the B300 SXM6 AC at the 100th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms every other recorded graphics processor. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. Consequently, no direct head-to-head comparison can be made from measured data, as the head-to-head benchmark list is empty and neither product has a recorded win.

The B300 SXM6 AC’s OpenCL score of 369,831 can be interpreted relative to its nearest rivals, all of which are also server-class accelerators. The NVIDIA B200, with an average score of 345,482, trails the B300 SXM6 AC by 7 percentage points. The NVIDIA H200 NVL scores 334,891, which is 10.4 percent behind. The AMD Instinct MI300X records 317,994, a deficit of 16.3 percent. The NVIDIA L40S, at 295,763, is 25 percent slower in this workload. These deltas show a consistent performance hierarchy: the B300 SXM6 AC sits at the top, with each successive rival falling further behind.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, by contrast, has no recorded OpenCL score, no percentile rank beyond the midpoint (50th percentile is listed as its position, but with no benchmark data to substantiate it), and no nearest rivals in the database. Its average benchmark score of zero reflects the absence of any test results. The database shows no wins for either product in head-to-head testing, so the only quantitative comparison available is the B300 SXM6 AC’s performance against its named rivals, not against the LX 7G100.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is the highest-scoring GPU in the database, with a Geekbench OpenCL result of 369,831 and a 100th percentile standing. Any user prioritizing raw compute performance, as measured by OpenCL, should select the B300 SXM6 AC. Its nearest competitor, the NVIDIA B200, is 7 percent slower; the gap widens to 10.4 percent for the H200 NVL, 16.3 percent for the AMD Instinct MI300X, and 25 percent for the L40S.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 cannot be evaluated on the same basis because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its average benchmark score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. Without measured results, the data cannot support a performance-based recommendation for the LX 7G100. The choice between these two products, strictly from the available information, favors the B300 SXM6 AC for any application where the recorded OpenCL score is relevant. The LX 7G100 remains unquantified in the database, so no comparative verdict is possible.

FAQ

Q: What is the only recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC?

A: The database records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369,831 for the B300 SXM6 AC, which places it at the 100th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX 7G100 has an empty benchmarks list and an average benchmark score of zero, with no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: How does the B300 SXM6 AC compare to the NVIDIA B200?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC scores 369,831, which is 7 percent higher than the B200’s average score of 345,482.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the LX 7G100?

A: The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the memory configuration of the B300 SXM6 AC?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC uses 288 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective).

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for both products?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC delivers 76.99 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses the GB110 chip and the Blackwell Ultra architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 208,000 million transistors on a die size of 1628 mm², with a transistor density of 127.8 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip and the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown.

Memory specifications diverge sharply. The B300 SXM6 AC has 288 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B300 SXM6 AC’s memory clock is 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective), while the LX 7G100’s memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Compute resources differ as well. The B300 SXM6 AC has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 592 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no tensor cores listed. Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences: the B300 SXM6 AC delivers 48.77 GPixel/s and 1,202.9 GTexel/s, whereas the LX 7G100 delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 76.99 TFLOPS for the B300 SXM6 AC versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100. FP16 performance is 76.99 TFLOPS (1:1) for the B300 SXM6 AC and 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the LX 7G100.

Power and physical specifications also separate the two. The B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested PSU of 1500 W, mounted as an SXM Module with PCIe 6.0 x16 interface and no display outputs. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, a suggested PSU of 550 W, a dual-slot form factor with a single 8-pin power connector, PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The B300 SXM6 AC’s dimensions are not recorded.

Release dates differ: the B300 SXM6 AC launched on September 10, 2025, while the LX 7G100 launched on June 17, 2026. The B300 SXM6 AC has a predecessor (Server Hopper) and successor (Server Rubin) listed, while the LX 7G100 has neither.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is built on the Blackwell Ultra architecture with the GB110 chip, a 5 nm TSMC process, and a transistor count of 208,000 million. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip, a 6 nm TSMC process, and an unknown transistor count. The B300 SXM6 AC’s die size is 1628 mm², while the LX 7G100’s die size is unknown.

The B300 SXM6 AC includes 592 tensor cores, a feature absent from the LX 7G100’s recorded specifications. The B300 SXM6 AC’s memory type is HBM3e, whereas the LX 7G100 uses GDDR6. The B300 SXM6 AC supports PCIe 6.0 x16, and the LX 7G100 supports PCIe 4.0 x16. The B300 SXM6 AC has no display outputs, while the LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The B300 SXM6 AC lists no API support, with DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan all marked as N/A.

The B300 SXM6 AC’s FP16 ratio is 1:1, meaning FP16 throughput equals FP32 throughput at 76.99 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100’s FP16 ratio is 2:1, with FP16 performance at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The B300 SXM6 AC’s ROP count is 24, while the LX 7G100 has 96 ROPs. The B300 SXM6 AC’s TMU count is 592, and the LX 7G100 has 192 TMUs.

The B300 SXM6 AC is a server module with an SXM form factor and no power connectors listed, while the LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector. The B300 SXM6 AC’s production status is active, as is the LX 7G100’s. The B300 SXM6 AC belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation, and the LX 7G100 belongs to the 7G100 generation. The B300 SXM6 AC’s manufacturer is NVIDIA, and the LX 7G100’s manufacturer is listed as unknown.