Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for both graphics processors contains no completed benchmark runs. The average benchmark score for each entry is zero, and the head-to-head benchmark table is empty. Consequently, there are no measured performance deltas, no percentile rankings beyond the neutral 50th percentile assigned to both, and no nearest rival comparisons to reference. The database shows zero wins for either product in direct comparison.

This absence of scores is itself informative. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with a theoretical FP32 throughput of 307.2 GFLOPS, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX reports a theoretical FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS. The gap between these computed peak rates is substantial, but without actual workload measurements, the database cannot confirm real-world scaling, thermal behavior, or driver efficiency. Benchmark results would be required to verify whether the LX MAX approaches its theoretical ceiling or falls short under sustained load.

The percentile field for both items sits at 50, which in this database indicates a midpoint placement when no empirical distribution exists. It is not a statement of competitive standing. The wins counters remain at zero for both sides, so no product can be declared ahead in any tested application, synthetic workload, or game title based on recorded measurements. Any performance conclusion must rely on architectural and specification analysis rather than observed scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their construction and design philosophy. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Generation 12.2 architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It is part of the Raptor Lake chip generation and belongs to the HD Graphics-M family. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX employs a completely different architecture called TrueGPU, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The node difference is significant: the LX MAX uses a smaller, more advanced manufacturing process, which typically allows higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, though the database does not list transistor counts or die sizes for either product.

The Intel part integrates its graphics into the broader Raptor Lake processor package, relying on a Ring Bus interface to communicate with the rest of the system. Its memory subsystem is system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, and memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete, dual-slot card using a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, yielding a fixed bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This is a dedicated memory pool, entirely separate from system RAM, which removes contention with CPU workloads.

The compute resources are starkly different. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX contains 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. These raw counts translate into pixel and texture rates of 4.800 GPixel/s and 9.600 GTexel/s for the Intel part, versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX MAX. The FP16 throughput follows the same pattern: 614.4 GFLOPS for Intel, 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX MAX, both at a 2:1 ratio relative to their FP32 values.

Neither product lists dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores in the database. The API support differs slightly: Intel reports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX reports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The DirectX feature level difference is notable, with the LX MAX supporting the higher 12_2 feature set required for certain modern rendering effects.

Where Each One Wins

Given the absence of benchmark data, the wins must be assessed from specification and intended usage patterns. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated processor with a 15 W TDP, designed for portable devices with system-dependent display outputs. Its entire memory and bandwidth budget comes from the host system's shared resources. This configuration suits lightweight workloads: basic desktop compositing, video playback, and low-resolution 2D applications where the CPU's integrated graphics can handle the load without a separate card. The 300 MHz base clock and 1200 MHz boost clock are modest, but the power envelope is minimal, which favors thin-and-light laptops where thermal and battery constraints dominate.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested power supply. It requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and occupies a full expansion slot. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory, 192 bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures and large frame buffers. The 6144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput target demanding 3D rendering, modern game titles, and compute workloads that need sustained parallel processing. The card outputs to 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, enabling multi-monitor setups at high refresh rates. The LX MAX wins in any scenario where dedicated graphics memory and high compute throughput are required.

The Intel part wins on integration simplicity. It requires no additional power connectors, no expansion slot, and no separate cooling solution. The data shows a Ring Bus interface, which ties it directly to the CPU complex, reducing latency for memory access in integrated configurations. The LX MAX wins on raw capability in every measured specification category: shading units, texture units, ROPs, memory size, memory type, bus width, bandwidth, pixel rate, texture rate, FP32, and FP16. The only categories where Intel holds an edge are the Vulkan version (1.4 versus 1.3) and the lower power draw.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The process node is 10 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for Lisuan Tech. The foundry is Intel versus TSMC. The chip designation is Raptor Lake versus 7G106. The architecture is Generation 12.2 versus TrueGPU. The generation family is HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) versus 7G100.

Clock behavior is not directly comparable. Intel lists a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1200 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no base or boost clock entries in the database, but its memory clock is fixed at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The Intel part has no memory clock, as its memory is system shared.

Memory configuration is a major separator. Intel uses system shared memory with no dedicated size, type, or bus width. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel bandwidth is listed as system dependent, meaning it scales with whatever RAM the host system provides.

Compute resources differ by orders of magnitude. Intel has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate is 4.800 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 9.600 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 307.2 GFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 614.4 GFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

Power and physical requirements differ completely. Intel consumes 15 W and uses an IGP slot width. The LX MAX consumes 225 W, uses a dual-slot width, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Intel has no listed dimensions because it is integrated into the processor package.

The bus interface is Ring Bus for Intel and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX MAX. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX MAX. API support shows DirectX 12 (12_1) for Intel versus DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) for the LX MAX, with matching OpenGL 4.6 and slightly different Vulkan versions (1.4 versus 1.3).

Production status is active for both. The release dates are 2023-01-03 for Intel and 2026-03-16 for the LX MAX. Intel lists a successor in Arc Graphics-M, while the LX MAX has no successor recorded. Neither product has a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 128 shading units.

Q: What memory configuration does each use?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP and uses an IGP slot width. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, uses a dual-slot width, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: What is the difference in FP32 performance?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile delivers 307.2 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: Which product supports a higher DirectX feature level?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What are the release dates for each product?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile was released on 2023-01-03. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX was released on 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark scores for either product, so the verdict rests entirely on specification differences. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated solution with minimal power draw, a 300 MHz base clock, a 1200 MHz boost clock, and system shared memory. Its 128 shading units and 4.800 GPixel/s pixel rate place it in the entry-level integrated segment. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete, dual-slot card with 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, and a 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are orders of magnitude higher.

For users constrained to a portable device with a 15 W thermal envelope, the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is the only option that fits. It requires no expansion slot, no external power connector, and no additional cooling. Its display outputs are portable device dependent, which is appropriate for laptops. The data indicates it is active in production and has a successor in Arc Graphics-M, suggesting ongoing development in this integrated segment.

For any workload requiring dedicated graphics memory, high texture throughput, or modern DirectX 12 Ultimate features, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the clear choice. Its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is fixed and does not depend on system RAM. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor configurations. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a standard high-bandwidth connection. The 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested power supply indicate a serious power delivery requirement, but the compute resources justify that draw.

The absence of benchmark data means no statement about real-world frame rates or workload scaling can be made. The recorded specifications show a fundamental class difference: one is a low-power integrated component, the other is a high-performance discrete accelerator. Users should select based on the physical and power constraints of their system, then match the compute requirements of their applications. The Intel part serves basic graphical output and light acceleration. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX serves demanding rendering and parallel compute tasks. The data supports no other conclusion.