Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX represent two very different approaches to GPU design, one targeting massive compute acceleration and the other aimed at general-purpose graphics and compute tasks. The database records show that both cards sit at the 50th percentile when compared against all GPUs, and both have an average benchmark score of zero, which means the recorded data contains no performance metrics to separate them. This analysis relies entirely on the architectural and specification differences found in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary difference in memory capacity between the two cards?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has 128 GB of HBM2e memory with an 8192-bit bus, providing 3.21 TB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, offering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem delivers 52.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, more than double the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX.

Q: How do the process nodes differ between these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem uses a 10 nm process at Intel foundry, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has a thermal design power of 2400 W and requires a suggested power supply of 2800 W. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX draws 225 W and needs a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card supports more display outputs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX features 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has no display outputs at all.

Q: What is the release timeline for these products?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem was released on January 9, 2023, and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a release date of March 16, 2026.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem uses the Ponte Vecchio chip, built on Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture. This is a data center-focused processor designed for high-throughput compute workloads. The chip is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, and it integrates 100,000 million transistors on a die size of 1280 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 78.1M per mm². The architecture includes 16,384 shading units, 1,024 texture mapping units, and 128 ray-tracing cores. Notably, the design has zero raster operations units, which aligns with its compute-centric role. The FP32 and FP16 performance figures are identical at 52.43 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these precision types.

In contrast, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip, based on the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. This is a more conventional graphics processor manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process, though the database lists the transistor count and die size as unknown. The LX MAX has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations units, making it a fully featured graphics card with display capabilities. Its FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS, which is exactly double its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS, meaning a 2:1 ratio for half-precision compute.

The memory architectures also differ fundamentally. The Intel card uses HBM2e memory with a massive 8192-bit bus width, while the Lisuan card uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, whereas the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Intel part has no display outputs, while the Lisuan card provides four DisplayPort 1.4a connections. In terms of API support, the Intel card lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, but no Vulkan version is recorded. The Lisuan card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 52.43 TFLOPS is more than twice the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The memory bandwidth advantage is even more pronounced, with 3.21 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a gap that favors the Intel card for memory-bound workloads such as large-scale simulations or scientific computing. The Intel card also has a far larger memory pool at 128 GB, which enables models and datasets that would not fit in the 12 GB of the Lisuan card. The texture rate of 1,638.4 GTexel/s on the Intel card dwarfs the 384.0 GTexel/s of the Lisuan card, indicating a strong lead in fill-rate-dependent operations.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on practicality and integration. It is a complete graphics solution with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, allowing direct connection to monitors, while the Intel card lacks any display outputs. The Lisuan card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3, which are modern graphics APIs for gaming and real-time rendering, whereas the Intel card only lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and no Vulkan support. The Lisuan card also has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s from its 96 ROPs, while the Intel card has a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s due to its lack of raster operations units. This makes the Lisuan card suitable for conventional graphics rendering, while the Intel card is specialized for compute acceleration.

Power efficiency is another area where the Lisuan card wins. Its TDP of 225 W is dramatically lower than the 2400 W of the Intel card, and its suggested power supply of 550 W is far more modest than the 2800 W requirement for the Intel subsystem. The Lisuan card also uses a smaller physical footprint at 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, compared to the 267 mm length of the Intel card (height and width are not recorded for the Intel part). Both cards are dual-slot designs and use a single 16-pin power connector.

Specification Differences

The database records several fields where the two cards differ. The process node is 10 nm for the Intel card and 6 nm for the Lisuan card, with foundries listed as Intel and TSMC respectively. The transistor count is 100,000 million for Intel, while it is unknown for Lisuan. The die size is 1280 mm² for Intel and unknown for Lisuan. Transistor density is 78.1M per mm² for Intel and not listed for Lisuan.

Clock speeds differ in the memory domain. The Intel card has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz, with memory clocked at 1565 MHz or 3.1 Gbps effective. The Lisuan card has no base or boost clock listed, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The memory configuration shows 128 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus for Intel, versus 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus for Lisuan. Bandwidth is 3.21 TB/s for Intel and 432.0 GB/s for Lisuan.

Compute unit counts vary widely. The Intel card has 16,384 shading units, 1,024 TMUs, 0 ROPs, and 128 ray-tracing cores. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no ray-tracing cores listed. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s for Intel and 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan. Texture rate is 1,638.4 GTexel/s for Intel and 384.0 GTexel/s for Lisuan. FP32 is 52.43 TFLOPS for Intel and 24.58 TFLOPS for Lisuan. FP16 is 52.43 TFLOPS (1:1) for Intel and 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for Lisuan.

Power and physical specs differ as well. The TDP is 2400 W for Intel and 225 W for Lisuan. The suggested PSU is 2800 W for Intel and 550 W for Lisuan. Both use a dual-slot design and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for Intel and PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan. Display outputs are none for Intel and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan. The API support shows DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6 for Intel, with no Vulkan listed, while Lisuan has DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Dimensions show a length of 267 mm for Intel and 248 mm for Lisuan, with Lisuan also having a height of 118 mm and a width of 48 mm. The Intel card has a successor listed as H3C Graphics, while the Lisuan card has no successor recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no benchmark scores for either card, with both showing an average benchmark score of zero and no entries in the head-to-head benchmark field. The wins are also recorded as zero for each side. This means the comparison must draw entirely from the specification data.

The most significant advantage for the Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is in FP32 compute. The Intel card delivers 52.43 TFLOPS, which is 113% higher than the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. This more than doubles the single-precision throughput, making the Intel card substantially more capable for FP32 workloads like scientific simulation and AI inference. In FP16, the Intel card provides 52.43 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, a smaller margin of about 6.7% in favor of Intel.

Memory bandwidth shows an even larger disparity. The Intel card's 3.21 TB/s is approximately 7.4 times the 432.0 GB/s of the Lisuan card. This massive bandwidth advantage, combined with the 128 GB memory capacity versus 12 GB, positions the Intel card for memory-intensive applications that require large working sets and rapid data movement. The Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s is adequate for its 12 GB frame buffer, but it cannot match the throughput of the HBM2e implementation.

The texture rate also heavily favors Intel, with 1,638.4 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s, a factor of about 4.3. This indicates that texturing-heavy compute tasks would see significant gains on the Intel platform. The Lisuan card counters with a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel card has a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s, which means the Lisuan card can perform rasterization tasks that the Intel card cannot.

The ray-tracing capabilities differ as well, with the Intel card featuring 128 ray-tracing cores and the Lisuan card listing no ray-tracing cores. This gives the Intel card a dedicated hardware path for ray-tracing workloads, though the Lisuan card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support suggests it can handle ray-traced content through other means. The Lisuan card also has a higher memory clock at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) compared to the Intel card's 1565 MHz (3.1 Gbps effective), but this does not compensate for the bus width difference.

Power consumption is the clearest win for the Lisuan card. The Intel card draws 2400 W, which is over 10 times the 225 W of the Lisuan card. The suggested power supply of 2800 W for the Intel system versus 550 W for the Lisuan system further highlights the operational cost difference in terms of infrastructure requirements. The Intel card's release date of January 9, 2023, predates the Lisuan card's March 16, 2026, release, indicating a later market entry for the Lisuan product.

The absence of benchmark scores in the database means these specification-based advantages cannot be confirmed by empirical testing. The recorded data shows both cards at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, which is a neutral positioning. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is clearly oriented toward high-end compute acceleration, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a more conventional graphics card with display output and modern API support. Each card wins in its intended domain, with Intel dominating raw throughput metrics and Lisuan offering a balanced, power-efficient graphics solution.