Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no benchmark scores for either the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 or the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, and the head-to-head benchmark table is empty. The win count for each GPU is zero, and both devices rest at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of zero. This means no direct performance comparison can be drawn from measured results, and the analysis below relies entirely on the architectural and specification differences recorded in the database.

The Intel part delivers a peak FP32 throughput of 44.44 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX reaches 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32. That places the Intel accelerator at roughly 81% higher FP32 compute than the Lisuan Tech part, a substantial lead in raw single-precision math. However, in FP16 operations the situation reverses: the Lisuan Tech LX MAX outputs 49.15 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 outputs 44.44 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech part therefore exceeds the Intel GPU by about 10.6% in FP16 throughput, assuming the recorded ratios hold.

Memory bandwidth is another significant differentiator. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 accesses 96 GB of HBM2e across an 8192-bit bus, yielding 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s. The Intel part provides more than five times the memory bandwidth, specifically 5.7 times the Lisuan Tech figure, which matters for large datasets and compute-bound workloads that saturate memory.

Texture rate also favors the Intel GPU. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 reaches 1,388.8 GTexel/s, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 384.0 GTexel/s. That is a 3.6 times advantage for the Intel accelerator. Pixel rate, however, goes the other way: the Intel part records 0 MPixel/s because it has no ROPs, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX MAX produces 192.0 GPixel/s with its 96 ROPs. For any rasterization or pixel-output workload, the Lisuan Tech part is the only one with functional pixel throughput.

The FP32 and FP16 numbers, memory bandwidth, and texture rate are the core measurable differences. Without actual benchmark scores, these specifications serve as the only quantitative basis for relative positioning. The absence of head-to-head results means the verdict must be framed strictly around the recorded hardware parameters.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 records 44.44 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX records 24.58 TFLOPS. The Intel part leads by roughly 81% in single-precision throughput.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP16 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX records 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 using a 2:1 ratio, compared to 44.44 TFLOPS for the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 using a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech part leads by about 10.6% in FP16 throughput.

Q: How do the memory subsystems differ?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part provides 5.7 times the memory bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports pixel output?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX records 192.0 GPixel/s with 96 ROPs and supports display output via 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 records 0 MPixel/s, has 0 ROPs, and lists no display outputs.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What is the power draw of each GPU?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has a TDP of 450 W with a suggested PSU of 850 W. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is built on the Ponte Vecchio chip, using Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture under the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 78.1M per mm². The architecture includes 14,336 shading units, 896 TMUs, 0 ROPs, and 112 ray tracing cores. The GPU has no tensor core count recorded. It uses an OAM Module slot width and a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, within the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. The architecture contains 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. No ray tracing cores or tensor cores are recorded. The slot width is dual-slot, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

The architectural split is stark. The Intel part is a compute-oriented accelerator with no ROPs, no display outputs, and a massive memory bus. The Lisuan Tech part is a conventional GPU with ROPs, display outputs, and a standard dual-slot form factor. The Intel GPU includes ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan Tech part does not list any. The Intel part uses HBM2e memory, while the Lisuan Tech part uses GDDR6. The Intel part has a higher transistor count by several orders of magnitude as recorded, though the Lisuan Tech transistor count is unknown, so a direct comparison is incomplete.

The API support also differs. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan version recorded. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The Lisuan Tech part therefore has a newer DirectX feature level and explicit Vulkan support.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part has 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die; the Lisuan Tech part lists unknown transistor count and die size. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 750 MHz and a boost clock of 1550 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech part has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks differ as well: the Intel part runs at 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective, the Lisuan Tech part at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity is 96 GB of HBM2e for Intel versus 12 GB of GDDR6 for Lisuan Tech. The bus width is 8192 bit versus 192 bit, and bandwidth is 2.46 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units are 14,336 versus 6,144, TMUs are 896 versus 192, and ROPs are 0 versus 96. Ray tracing cores are 112 for Intel and none recorded for Lisuan Tech. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 44.44 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 450 W for Intel versus 225 W for Lisuan Tech. The suggested PSU is 850 W versus 550 W. Slot width is OAM Module versus dual-slot. The power connector is none recorded for Intel versus 1x 16-pin for Lisuan Tech. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are none for Intel versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan Tech. The Lisuan Tech part also has recorded dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the Intel part has no dimensions recorded.

The Verdict

The data indicates two fundamentally different devices. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a high-bandwidth, high-FP32 compute accelerator with no display output and no pixel pipeline. It leads in FP32 throughput by 81%, memory bandwidth by a factor of 5.7, texture rate by a factor of 3.6, and includes ray tracing cores. It also carries a higher TDP of 450 W and requires a larger power supply.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a conventional GPU with display outputs, ROPs, and a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s. It leads in FP16 throughput by 10.6% and supports newer API features including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.3. It uses less power at 225 W and fits in a dual-slot form factor with a 16-pin connector.

For compute workloads that rely on FP32, memory bandwidth, and texture throughput, the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is the stronger choice based on the recorded specifications. For workloads that need pixel output, display connectivity, FP16 throughput, or lower power draw, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the only viable option among the two, since the Intel part has no pixel rate and no display outputs.

The lack of benchmark scores means neither GPU has a measured performance advantage in the database. The verdict rests on the architecture and specification records, which show the Intel part dominating in raw compute and memory resources while the Lisuan Tech part dominates in rasterization and API compatibility.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins in every metric related to raw compute density and memory capacity. Its 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 output nearly doubles the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Its 2.46 TB/s memory bandwidth dwarfs the 432.0 GB/s of the Lisuan Tech part, and its 96 GB of HBM2e versus 12 GB of GDDR6 provides eight times the memory capacity. The 1,388.8 GTexel/s texture rate is 3.6 times higher than the 384.0 GTexel/s of the Lisuan Tech part. The Intel GPU also has 112 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan Tech part has none recorded. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is twice the bandwidth of the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the Lisuan Tech part.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in pixel processing and display functionality. Its 192.0 GPixel/s is the only recorded pixel throughput, as the Intel part has 0 MPixel/s. The 96 ROPs enable rasterization work that the Intel part cannot perform. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow direct display connection, while the Intel part has no outputs. The Lisuan Tech part also wins in FP16 throughput with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 44.44 TFLOPS, a 10.6% advantage. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.3, which the Intel part does not match, since the Intel part only lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6.

Power efficiency favors the Lisuan Tech LX MAX as well, with a 225 W TDP versus 450 W for the Intel part, and a suggested PSU of 550 W versus 850 W. The Lisuan Tech part is also physically more conventional, fitting a dual-slot design with measured dimensions of 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, whereas the Intel part uses an OAM Module form factor with no recorded dimensions.

In practical terms, the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is for data center compute, large memory pools, and high-bandwidth applications. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is for workstation-style tasks that need display output, pixel processing, FP16 compute, and moderate power consumption. Neither GPU has benchmark results in the database, so these conclusions derive from the recorded hardware specifications only.