Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison
Intel Arc Pro B60
Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
The Verdict
The data presents an unusual comparison. The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a complete set of recorded benchmark results and a known average score of 3182, placing it in the 20th percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and no rival comparisons in the database. The LX ULTRA is assigned a 50th percentile ranking, but that ranking is not supported by any measured performance data. The Arc Pro B60 is the only card in this comparison with verifiable performance metrics, so any selection must be based on the Intel card's measured results and the Lisuan card's architectural specifications. The LX ULTRA offers higher raw compute figures on paper, but the database contains no evidence of how those figures translate into real-world performance.
Architecture Differences
The two cards diverge at the most fundamental hardware level. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.
Memory configurations are similar in capacity but differ in speed. Both cards carry 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The Intel card runs its memory at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed, producing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing 432.0 GB/s. The Intel card holds a 24 GB/s bandwidth advantage.
The shader and compute configurations show a significant structural difference. The Lisuan LX ULTRA lists 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The Intel Arc Pro B60 lists 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The Lisuan card has more than double the shading units, 32 more TMUs, and 16 more ROPs. The LX ULTRA also lists 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 compute, while the Intel card lists 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16. The Lisuan card claims exactly double the FP32 throughput and double the FP16 throughput of the Intel card.
The Intel card includes 20 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan card lists no ray tracing core count. The Intel card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Intel card has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Lisuan card has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel card is rated at 200 W with a 1x 8-pin power connector, while the Lisuan card is rated at 225 W with a 1x 16-pin connector. Both suggest a 550 W power supply. The Intel card is 167 mm long, 69 mm tall, and 40 mm wide; the Lisuan card is 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, making it substantially larger in length and height.
FAQ
Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark results in the database?
A: No. The LX ULTRA has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile ranking is not supported by any recorded measurements.
Q: What is the Intel Arc Pro B60's measured performance?
A: The Arc Pro B60 has an average benchmark score of 3182 and sits in the 20th percentile among all GPUs. Its recorded scores include 14580 in Passmark G3D, 7029 in Passmark GPU Compute, 763 in Passmark G2D, and 2646 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.
Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute on paper?
A: The Lisuan LX ULTRA lists 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60's 12.29 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card also lists 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus the Intel card's 24.58 TFLOPS FP16.
Q: How do the memory systems compare?
A: Both cards use 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel card has a memory clock of 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Lisuan card has 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for 432.0 GB/s. The Intel card provides 24 GB/s more bandwidth.
Q: Which card supports ray tracing?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 lists 20 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan LX ULTRA lists no ray tracing core count, with that field recorded as null in the database.
Q: What are the physical size differences?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 measures 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Lisuan LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Lisuan card is 101 mm longer and 43 mm taller. Both are dual-slot cards.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses a 5 nm process; the Lisuan LX ULTRA uses 6 nm. The Intel chip has 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die; the Lisuan chip has unknown transistor count and die size. The Intel card's base clock is 2000 MHz with a 2400 MHz boost; the Lisuan card has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clock differs: 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for Intel versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for Lisuan. Bandwidth differs: 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units differ: 2560 versus 6144. TMUs differ: 160 versus 192. ROPs differ: 80 versus 96. The Intel card has 20 ray tracing cores; the Lisuan card has none recorded. FP32 differs: 12.29 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 differs: 24.58 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS. TDP differs: 200 W versus 225 W. Power connectors differ: 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin. Bus interface differs: PCIe 5.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support differs: 1.4 versus 1.3. Dimensions differ: 167 mm by 69 mm by 40 mm versus 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm. Release dates differ: 2025-09-04 versus 2026-03-16. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 499 USD; the Lisuan card has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel card has an average benchmark score of 3182 and percentile rank 20; the Lisuan card has average score 0 and percentile rank 50.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and the wins counter shows 0 for both cards. This means there is no direct measured comparison available. The only performance data comes from the Intel Arc Pro B60's individual benchmark entries. Those scores are: 2646 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 61 in Passmark DirectX 10, 122 in Passmark DirectX 11, 76 in Passmark DirectX 12, 179 in Passmark DirectX 9, 763 in Passmark G2D, 14580 in Passmark G3D, and 7029 in Passmark GPU Compute. The average of these scores is 3182, which places the card in the 20th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with an average score of 3163 and a delta of 0.6 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER with an average score of 3075 and a delta of 3.5 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 with an average score of 3210 and a delta of -0.9 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce 920M with an average score of 3287 and a delta of -3.2 percent. The Arc Pro B60 is therefore 0.6 percent ahead of the Quadro P1000, 3.5 percent ahead of the RTX 5080 SUPER, 0.9 percent behind the GT 640, and 3.2 percent behind the GeForce 920M. For the Lisuan LX ULTRA, no comparable scores exist. The database records no measurements, no rivals, and no average score for that card.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins in every category where measured data exists. It has a verified average benchmark score of 3182, a complete set of DirectX and compute test results, and a known position in the 20th percentile of all GPUs. It also holds advantages in memory bandwidth (456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s), memory clock speed (2375 MHz versus 2250 MHz), process node (5 nm versus 6 nm), Vulkan API support (1.4 versus 1.3), bus interface generation (PCIe 5.0 versus PCIe 4.0), display output version (DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1.4a), and physical footprint (167 mm versus 268 mm in length). It includes ray tracing cores, which the Lisuan card does not list. It also has a lower TDP at 200 W versus 225 W.
The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on paper in raw compute specifications. It lists 6144 shading units versus 2560, 192 TMUs versus 160, 96 ROPs versus 80, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 12.29 TFLOPS, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 24.58 TFLOPS. It has a wider PCIe interface at x16 versus x8, though on an older PCIe 4.0 standard. It is also assigned a higher percentile ranking of 50 versus 20, but that ranking is not supported by any recorded benchmark data. The Lisuan card's transistor count, die size, and clock speeds are unknown, so its compute figures cannot be verified against measured performance. The database shows that the Intel Arc Pro B60 is the only card in this comparison with demonstrated results. The Lisuan LX ULTRA's specifications suggest higher theoretical throughput, but the absence of benchmark scores means the data cannot confirm any real-world advantage.