Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison
Intel Arc Pro B60
Lisuan Tech LX 7G100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded database contains benchmark results for the Intel Arc Pro B60, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 currently has no benchmark entries. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests. The Arc Pro B60 shows an average benchmark score of 3182 across its eight recorded tests, placing it in the 20th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (0.6% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 at 3210 (0.9% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 920M at 3287 (3.2% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER at 3075 (3.5% lower).
In individual tests, the Arc Pro B60 delivers its strongest result in PassMark G3D with a score of 14580, followed by PassMark GPU Compute at 7029. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test produces a score of 2646. Legacy DirectX tests show lower figures: PassMark DirectX 9 scores 179, DirectX 11 scores 122, and DirectX 10 scores 61. The DirectX 12 PassMark test yields 76, while the 2D graphics test scores 763.
Because the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmarks, the database shows zero wins for each card in head-to-head comparisons. The Arc Pro B60's measured data provides a baseline, but the absence of LX 7G100 numbers means no percentage deltas can be computed between the two. The LX 7G100 does carry a 50th percentile rating in the database, but this figure is not derived from any individual benchmark scores, as its average score is recorded as 0.
The Arc Pro B60's FP32 throughput is 12.29 TFLOPS, while the LX 7G100 lists a substantially higher 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16 compute, the Arc Pro B60 reaches 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), and the LX 7G100 doubles that to 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These theoretical figures suggest the LX 7G100 has roughly double the raw compute capacity, but without actual benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether that translates into real-world performance advantages.
Where Each One Wins
The Arc Pro B60 has measurable wins in every recorded benchmark category simply because it has data. Its PassMark G3D score of 14580 indicates solid rasterization performance for professional workloads. The GPU compute score of 7029 suggests capable general-purpose compute, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 2646 reflects modern DX12 rendering performance. The PassMark G2D score of 763 points to reasonable 2D desktop acceleration.
The LX 7G100 has no recorded wins in the database. Its theoretical specifications indicate potential advantages in raw compute: 6144 shading units versus 2560, 192 texture mapping units versus 160, and 96 raster output units versus 80. The FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS is exactly double the Arc Pro B60's 12.29 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is slightly lower at 432.0 GB/s compared to 456.0 GB/s, but both cards use 192-bit GDDR6 memory interfaces. The LX 7G100 carries 12 GB of memory versus 24 GB on the Arc Pro B60.
For use cases, the data suggests the Arc Pro B60 handles any task where measured results exist: DX12 gaming workloads, compute shaders, and 2D operations. The LX 7G100's higher shading unit count and FP32 throughput point toward compute-heavy applications, but the database contains no validation of this. Professional visualization or rendering tasks that rely on certified drivers and tested performance would favor the Arc Pro B60 based on available evidence.
Architecture Differences
The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.
Clock behavior differs significantly. The Arc Pro B60 has specified base and boost clocks of 2000 MHz and 2400 MHz respectively. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks are similar: the Arc Pro B60 runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Both use GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus, but the Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB capacity versus 12 GB on the LX 7G100. Bandwidth favors the Arc Pro B60 at 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.
The LX 7G100 has a much higher shading unit count at 6144 versus 2560, more TMUs at 192 versus 160, and more ROPs at 96 versus 80. The Arc Pro B60 includes 20 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no RT core count. Pixel rate is identical at 192.0 GPixel/s for both cards, and texture rate matches at 384.0 GTexel/s.
Power and physical characteristics differ. The Arc Pro B60 has a TDP of 200 W, while the LX 7G100 draws 225 W. Both use dual-slot designs with a single 8-pin power connector and both suggest a 550 W power supply. The Arc Pro B60 is much more compact at 167 mm length, 69 mm height, and 40 mm width. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide.
Interface and display output specifications vary. The Arc Pro B60 uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs on the Arc Pro B60 are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, whereas the LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc Pro B60 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 is limited to Vulkan 1.3.
The Arc Pro B60 was released on September 4, 2025, with an active production status. The LX 7G100 has a release date of June 17, 2026, and is also listed as active in production.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput according to the database?
A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16.
Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both use a 192-bit bus, with the Arc Pro B60 offering 456.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 432.0 GB/s on the LX 7G100.
Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro B60 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?
A: The Arc Pro B60 has an average benchmark score of 3182. It sits 0.6% above the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163), 0.9% below the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (3210), 3.2% below the NVIDIA GeForce 920M (3287), and 3.5% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (3075).
Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark results?
A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the LX 7G100, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its 50th percentile rating is not tied to any individual test scores.
Q: What are the physical size differences between the two cards?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 is 167 mm long, 69 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is substantially larger at 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.
Q: Which card supports newer display output standards?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Arc Pro B60 also supports Vulkan 1.4 compared to Vulkan 1.3 on the LX 7G100, though both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6.
The Verdict
The database presents a clear asymmetry: the Intel Arc Pro B60 has comprehensive measured data, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has none. For anyone requiring verified performance figures, the Arc Pro B60 is the only card with evidence across DX9 through DX12, compute, and 3DMark Steel Nomad tests. Its average score of 3182 and 20th percentile placement provide concrete reference points.
The LX 7G100 offers compelling theoretical specifications. Its 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 suggest substantially higher compute capacity than the Arc Pro B60. The 6 nm process node and 225 W TDP indicate a design aimed at throughput rather than efficiency. However, the absence of any benchmark results means these specifications remain unvalidated.
The Arc Pro B60 also brings advantages in memory capacity (24 GB versus 12 GB), bandwidth (456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s), and a more compact physical footprint. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and DisplayPort 2.1 outputs are newer standards than the LX 7G100's PCIe 4.0 x16 and DisplayPort 1.4a. The Arc Pro B60 includes 20 ray tracing cores, which the LX 7G100 does not list.
The LX 7G100's higher shading unit count and doubled FP32 figure point toward compute-heavy workloads, but the database cannot confirm real-world performance. Its 50th percentile rating, without supporting benchmark data, does not correlate with any measured results. The Arc Pro B60, despite its lower theoretical compute, has actual scores that place it among established NVIDIA workstation and consumer cards.
For users who need validated performance, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is the data-backed choice. For those prioritizing raw specification sheets, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists higher compute numbers. The database currently supports only the Arc Pro B60 with measurable outcomes, and until the LX 7G100 receives benchmark entries, any comparison between the two remains speculative.