Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B370 and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q occupy opposite ends of the graphics hardware spectrum, and the recorded data in the database makes that divide explicit. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built for Panther Lake mobile platforms, while the NVIDIA part is a dual-slot, 300 W workstation accelerator with 96 GB of GDDR7 memory. Their benchmark scores are not directly comparable because the Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, whereas the RTX PRO 6000D has a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 11088. The absence of a score for the Intel part means the head-to-head comparison relies on architectural specifications, clock behavior, and memory configuration rather than measured performance equality. What the database does show is a 0.1% delta between the RTX PRO 6000D and the AMD Radeon RX 550, a 0.4% delta versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, and a -1.2% delta versus the AMD FirePro W4300, placing the NVIDIA card in a tight cluster of lower-tier GPUs in this specific test, despite its massive compute resources.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B370 versus the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, indicating that no direct test was run or recorded for this pairing. The Intel part has an empty benchmarks array, meaning there are no scores to compare against the NVIDIA card’s single result. The RTX PRO 6000D’s only benchmark is 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 with a score of 11088, which serves as its average benchmark score and its percentile anchor. The nearest rivals for the NVIDIA card show that it performs within 1.2% of three very different GPUs: the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q at 11088 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 550 at 11075 (0.1% delta), and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 11047 (0.4% delta). The AMD FirePro W4300 scores 11225, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX PRO 6000D. This clustering suggests that in the Steel Nomad DX12 workload, the NVIDIA card’s score is not representative of its theoretical compute capacity; instead, it lands in a range occupied by entry-level and older GPUs. For the Intel Arc Pro B370, the absence of any benchmark score means the database cannot assign a percentile or rival comparison. Its percentileVsAllGpus field is 50, which is the same as the NVIDIA card, but this is a default value rather than a result of measured performance. The data indicates that any direct performance comparison between these two products would require additional testing that has not been recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and form factor integration. Its TDP is 25 W, which is 275 W lower than the NVIDIA card’s 300 W TDP. The Intel part is an IGP with a slot width of IGP and no power connectors, meaning it draws power from the host platform and requires no external cabling. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot design with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 700 W. The Intel part’s memory is system shared, so it uses the host system’s RAM rather than dedicated VRAM, which eliminates the need for separate memory modules. The NVIDIA card uses 96 GB of GDDR7 with a 512-bit bus and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, which is a dedicated memory subsystem. In terms of clock behavior, the Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2288 MHz. The Intel part’s lower base clock and higher boost clock indicate a wider dynamic range, but the NVIDIA card’s higher base clock means it sustains higher minimum performance under load.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance is 110.1 TFLOPS, which is 17.9 times the Intel part’s 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 110.1 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel, a 9.0 times difference. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs, compared to the Intel part’s 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The NVIDIA card’s pixel rate is 439.3 GPixel/s, which is 9.2 times the Intel part’s 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 1,720.6 GTexel/s for NVIDIA versus 96.00 GTexel/s for Intel, a 17.9 times difference. The NVIDIA card also has 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, while the Intel part has 10 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card’s memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s is orders of magnitude higher than the Intel part’s system-dependent bandwidth, which cannot be quantified because it relies on the host system’s memory configuration.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a Panther Lake chip, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is 3 nm versus 5 nm, which gives the Intel part a density advantage in theory, but the NVIDIA chip has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The Intel part’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density comparison is possible. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The Intel part has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor cores specified. The NVIDIA card’s memory controller is 512-bit wide, supporting 96 GB of GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), producing 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel part has no dedicated memory; it uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth.

The clock strategies differ. Intel’s base clock is 300 MHz, which is very low, but its boost clock reaches 2400 MHz, a 8.0 times increase. NVIDIA’s base clock is 1590 MHz and boost is 2288 MHz, a 1.4 times increase. This suggests the Intel part is designed for bursty workloads with aggressive boosting, while the NVIDIA card maintains a higher sustained clock. The NVIDIA card has a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 700 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part has no power connectors and no suggested PSU because it is an IGP. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with dimensions of 267 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions because it is integrated into a processor package. The NVIDIA card supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs differ: NVIDIA provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while Intel’s outputs are portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The release dates differ significantly. The NVIDIA card was released on 2025-03-17, while the Intel part was released on 2026-01-26, nearly ten months later. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is Workstation Ada, while the Intel part’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD, which is stated once here as the recorded launch price. The Intel part has no launch MSRP field value.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D has a TDP of 300 W. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors, whereas the NVIDIA card requires a 1x 16-pin connector and a 700 W suggested PSU.

Q: How do their FP32 performance figures compare?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D delivers 110.1 TFLOPS FP32, which is 17.9 times the Intel Arc Pro B370’s 6.144 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card also achieves 110.1 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), versus 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) for the Intel part.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 512-bit bus and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, so no fixed capacity or bandwidth is recorded.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries for each chip?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, while the Intel chip’s transistor count and die size are unknown.

Q: What is the benchmark score for the NVIDIA card in the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D has a single recorded benchmark: 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 with a score of 11088. Its nearest rivals in that test are the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q at 11088 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 550 at 11075 (0.1% delta), and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 11047 (0.4% delta). The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How do the shading unit counts differ?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every hardware specification field. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip has 92,200 million transistors and a 750 mm² die size, while the Intel part’s transistor count and die size are unknown. The NVIDIA card’s transistor density is 122.9M per mm², but no density figure exists for the Intel part.

Clock specifications: Intel has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while NVIDIA has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2288 MHz. Memory clocks differ: Intel uses system shared memory, while NVIDIA uses 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) GDDR7.

Memory configuration: Intel has system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while NVIDIA has 96 GB of GDDR7 with a 512-bit bus and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: Intel has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. NVIDIA has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. Intel has no tensor cores listed.

Performance rates: Intel’s pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. NVIDIA’s pixel rate is 439.3 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,720.6 GTexel/s.

FP32 and FP16: Intel delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). NVIDIA delivers 110.1 TFLOPS FP32 and 110.1 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1).

Power and form factor: Intel has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. NVIDIA has a 300 W TDP, dual-slot width, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a 700 W suggested PSU.

Bus interface and dimensions: Intel uses an IGP bus interface with no recorded dimensions. NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has dimensions of 267 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width.

Display outputs: Intel’s outputs are portable device dependent, while NVIDIA has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Release dates: Intel was released on 2026-01-26, NVIDIA on 2025-03-17. Predecessors differ: Intel’s is HD Graphics-WM, NVIDIA’s is Workstation Ada. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD, while the Intel part has no launch MSRP. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Production status is Active for both.