Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete asymmetry between these two parts, with the NVIDIA RTX 6000D holding every measurable performance advantage. The RTX 6000D delivers 97.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute against 6.144 TFLOPS from the Intel Arc Pro B370, a 15.8x gap in raw shader throughput. Texture rate follows the same pattern: 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s, a 15.8x difference. Pixel throughput is similarly lopsided at 466.6 GPixel/s for NVIDIA versus 48.00 GPixel/s for Intel, a 9.7x margin.

The benchmark scores reinforce this hierarchy. The RTX 6000D posts an average benchmark score of 195,964, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0 with a 50th percentile ranking, meaning no recorded benchmark results exist for it in the database. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 6000D scores 3,522, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 388,405. The Intel part has no comparable entries.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 6000D provide context for its standing. It outperforms the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB by 0.8% (194,415 average score), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.7% (187,147), and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 6.1% (184,664). It trails the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB by 5.4% (207,124). These are small margins, indicating the RTX 6000D sits in a tightly contested performance tier among professional accelerators.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 6000D wins in every compute category with measurable data. Its FP32 throughput of 97.04 TFLOPS supports heavy simulation, AI inference, and rendering workloads. The FP16 rating of 97.04 TFLOPS (1:1) means there is no speed penalty for mixed-precision work, which is valuable for scientific computing and neural network training. The 1.40 TB/s memory bandwidth from 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus provides the data feed rate needed to sustain those compute rates. The 156 ray tracing cores and 624 tensor cores make it suitable for path tracing and tensor-accelerated applications.

The Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 25 W TDP is 4.2% of the RTX 6000D's 600 W TDP, and its IGP slot width with no power connectors means it draws from the host system without additional cabling. It uses system shared memory, so the capacity is dictated by the host, not a fixed VRAM pool. The 3 nm process node from Intel Foundry gives it a manufacturing advantage in transistor density potential, though the die size and transistor count are not recorded. Its base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2400 MHz are lower than the RTX 6000D's 1992 MHz base and 2430 MHz boost, but the Intel part's power envelope is drastically smaller.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm node at Intel Foundry. The transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, so no density figure is available. The architecture is the successor to HD Graphics-WM, indicating it is an integrated graphics solution rather than a discrete add-in card.

The NVIDIA RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, in the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². It succeeds the Workstation Ada generation. This is a discrete, dual-slot card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Intel part has 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part has 19,968 shading units, 624 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 156 RT cores, and 624 tensor cores. The Intel part has no recorded tensor core count. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The two parts diverge on nearly every recorded specification. The RTX 6000D has fixed memory: 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, so its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent. The RTX 6000D has a base clock of 1992 MHz and boost of 2430 MHz; the Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost.

The RTX 6000D has a TDP of 600 W, requires a 1000 W suggested PSU, uses a 16-pin power connector, and occupies dual slots with dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, an IGP form factor, and display outputs that are portable device dependent. The RTX 6000D provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

The NVIDIA part was released on 2025-07-13 with a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The Intel part was released on 2026-01-26 and has no launch MSRP recorded. The RTX 6000D has a production status of Active, as does the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 6000D delivers 97.04 TFLOPS of FP32, compared to 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc Pro B370.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The RTX 6000D has 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, so its capacity and bandwidth depend on the host system.

Q: How does the power consumption compare?

A: The RTX 6000D has a 600 W TDP and requires a 1000 W suggested PSU. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and no power connectors.

Q: Does the Intel part have any tensor cores?

A: The database records no tensor core count for the Intel Arc Pro B370. The RTX 6000D has 624 tensor cores.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each?

A: The RTX 6000D ranks in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 ranks in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: Which card has better ray tracing hardware?

A: The RTX 6000D has 156 RT cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 RT cores.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear split by use case. The NVIDIA RTX 6000D is the choice for any workload where raw compute, memory bandwidth, and professional rendering matter. Its 97.04 TFLOPS FP32, 1.40 TB/s bandwidth, and 84 GB VRAM put it in the top 2% of all GPUs in the database. Its benchmark scores confirm this: 3,522 in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 388,405 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its nearest rivals are all professional accelerators within 6.1% of its average score, so it competes at the top tier of workstation-class hardware.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, using system shared memory. It has no recorded benchmark scores, no discrete memory, and no standalone performance data. Its purpose is different: it serves as an IGP for portable devices, which is why its display outputs are portable device dependent and its slot width is IGP. It is not comparable to the RTX 6000D on any performance metric in the database.

The architecture gap is fundamental. The RTX 6000D is a 750 mm² discrete GPU with 92,200 million transistors, a 5 nm TSMC process, and a 600 W power envelope. The Arc Pro B370 is a 3 nm Intel Foundry part with unknown die size and transistor count, drawing 25 W. The NVIDIA card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs; the Intel part's outputs depend on the host device.

For users requiring maximum compute density, the RTX 6000D is the only option with recorded performance data. For systems needing minimal power draw and integrated graphics, the Arc Pro B370 fits that niche, but it cannot be evaluated against the RTX 6000D through benchmark results, as none exist for the Intel part. The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the RTX 6000D is the high-performance accelerator, and the Arc Pro B370 is a low-power integrated solution with no measurable performance footprint in the recorded data.