AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM and the NVIDIA RTX 6000D. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the AMD part, meaning its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, placing it at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA RTX 6000D, in contrast, has two recorded benchmark scores: 3522 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 388405 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score is 195964, which places it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs.

The RTX 6000D's average score of 195964 positions it 0.8% above the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB (194415), 4.7% above the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147), and 6.1% above the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation (184664). The only rival it trails is the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB (207124), which leads by 5.4%. These deltas show the RTX 6000D sits in a tightly contested band among professional compute accelerators, with all four nearest rivals within roughly 6% of its score.

Since the RX 7400 OEM has no benchmark scores in the database, no direct win comparison can be made. The data indicates zero wins for each card in head-to-head testing. What the numbers do reveal is the scale of the gap: the RTX 6000D's FP32 compute of 97.04 TFLOPS versus the RX 7400 OEM's 7.885 TFLOPS represents a difference of roughly 12.3 times in raw shader throughput. Texture rate shows a similar chasm, with the RTX 6000D delivering 1,516.3 GTexel/s against 123.2 GTexel/s for the AMD card, an approximate 12.3-fold advantage. Pixel rate favors NVIDIA by a factor of about 6.6, at 466.6 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from entirely different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. Its predecessor is listed as Navi II, and its successor as Navi IV.

The NVIDIA RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture and classified under the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. It is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process and packs 92,200 million transistors onto a 750 mm² die, for a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. Its predecessor is listed as Workstation Ada, with no successor recorded. The transistor density difference is notable: NVIDIA crams nearly twice as many transistors per square millimeter (122.9M versus 65.2M per mm²), reflecting both the tighter 5 nm node and a fundamentally different design philosophy.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 6000D uses 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus, delivering 1.40 TB/s, which is roughly 8.1 times the bandwidth. Clock behavior also differs: the AMD card runs a base clock of 330 MHz and boost of 1100 MHz, while the NVIDIA card runs a base of 1992 MHz and boost of 2430 MHz. Memory clocks are 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) for AMD versus 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA.

The compute resource counts highlight the scale difference. The RX 7400 OEM has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The RTX 6000D has 19968 shading units, 624 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 156 ray tracing cores, and 624 tensor cores. The AMD card has no tensor cores listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: AMD offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while NVIDIA offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. The bus interface also differs, with AMD using PCIe 4.0 x8 and NVIDIA using PCIe 5.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 6000D dominates every measurable performance category in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 97.04 TFLOPS is roughly 12.3 times that of the RX 7400 OEM's 7.885 TFLOPS. FP16 performance follows the same 1:1 ratio for both cards, so the proportional advantage remains identical. The RTX 6000D's 1.40 TB/s memory bandwidth supports workloads that require massive data movement, and its 84 GB frame buffer allows datasets far beyond the 8 GB capacity of the AMD card.

The RTX 6000D's benchmark presence confirms its positioning. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3522 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 388405 are the only recorded performance data points in this comparison. The 98th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of all GPUs in the database, while the RX 7400 OEM's 50th percentile with a zero average score reflects its absence of recorded benchmarks rather than a measured performance level.

The RX 7400 OEM wins in power efficiency on paper. Its TDP of 55 W is dramatically lower than the RTX 6000D's 600 W, and its suggested power supply is 250 W versus 1000 W. Physical dimensions favor the AMD card as well: it is 167 mm long and single-slot, while the NVIDIA card is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, 40 mm wide, and dual-slot. The AMD card uses a single 6-pin power connector, while the NVIDIA card requires a 16-pin connector. These factors indicate the RX 7400 OEM is designed for compact, low-power systems, whereas the RTX 6000D demands a workstation chassis with substantial power delivery.

For workloads that fit within 8 GB of memory and modest compute requirements, the RX 7400 OEM could serve as a low-power display adapter or entry-level compute device. For professional rendering, AI inference, or large dataset processing, the RTX 6000D's 84 GB memory, tensor cores, and much higher compute throughput place it in a different performance class entirely.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear stratification. The NVIDIA RTX 6000D is a professional compute accelerator aimed at the top of the performance spectrum, evidenced by its 98th percentile ranking and proximity to other high-end accelerators like the A100 series and RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Its 84 GB GDDR7 memory and 97.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for tasks that demand both capacity and speed. The 600 W TDP and 1000 W suggested PSU indicate it is designed for sustained, heavy workloads in professional environments.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM occupies the opposite end of the spectrum. With no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile default ranking, its actual performance relative to other GPUs is unmeasured in this database. Its specifications suggest a low-power, compact card: 55 W TDP, single-slot design, 167 mm length, 8 GB GDDR6, and 7.885 TFLOPS FP32. The 1:1 FP16/FP32 ratio and lack of tensor cores indicate it lacks specialized AI acceleration hardware. Its release date of August 2025 comes about three weeks after the RTX 6000D's July 2025 release, but the two products target entirely different market segments.

Users seeking maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity, and professional-grade features should select the RTX 6000D based on its measured benchmark scores and specifications. Users needing a small, low-power GPU with basic compute capability and modern display outputs could consider the RX 7400 OEM, but the database provides no benchmark evidence of its performance. The RTX 6000D's launch MSRP is 8,565 USD, which reflects its professional positioning.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 6000D delivers 97.04 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 12.3 times in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA RTX 6000D has 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for each card?

A: The RTX 6000D scores 3522 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 388405 in Geekbench OpenCL, with an average score of 195964. The RX 7400 OEM has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 6000D compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.8% above the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, 4.7% above the A100 SXM4 40 GB, 6.1% above the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, and 5.4% below the A100 PCIe 80 GB.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP and suggests a 250 W power supply. The RTX 6000D has a 600 W TDP and suggests a 1000 W power supply.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 6000D additionally has 624 tensor cores, while the RX 7400 OEM has none listed.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM | NVIDIA RTX 6000D |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 92,200 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 750 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 1992 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2430 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) | 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 84 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 448 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 1.40 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 19968 |

| TMUs | 112 | 624 |

| ROPs | 64 | 192 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 156 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 624 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 466.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 1,516.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 97.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 97.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 600 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 1000 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | 167 mm (6.6 inches) length | 304 mm (12 inches) length, 137 mm (5.4 inches) height, 40 mm (1.6 inches) width |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2025-07-13 |

| Production Status | Not listed | Active |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 98 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 195964 |