Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Arc Pro B370 contains no benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has an extensive benchmark profile. This asymmetry means every measurable performance comparison in the database is one-sided. The RTX 5070 Ti records an average benchmark score of 49,957 across ten tests, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 holds a 50th percentile placement with an average score of zero, indicating no workload results are available for direct comparison.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s strongest recorded result is in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 225,122. Its OpenCL result follows at 212,363. In Passmark G3D, the card posts 32,974, while its compute score reaches 20,203. The DirectX legacy tests show 351 in DirectX 9, 300 in DirectX 11, 192 in DirectX 10, and 127 in DirectX 12. The 2D graphics score is 1,332. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card delivers 6,604.

The nearest rival data for the RTX 5070 Ti provides context for these scores. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 averages 50,001, which is 0.1% below the RTX 5070 Ti. The Intel Arc A550M averages 49,737, sitting 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT averages 50,951, a 2% advantage for that card. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT averages 48,477, which is 3.1% behind the RTX 5070 Ti. These deltas show the RTX 5070 Ti operating within a tight band around its closest competitors, with the largest gap being the 3.1% lead over the RX 6800 XT and the 2% deficit to the RX 6900 XT.

Because the Arc Pro B370 lacks any recorded benchmarks, no win counts exist for either side. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty. The database shows zero wins for the Intel part and zero wins for the NVIDIA part. Any performance verdict must rely exclusively on the RTX 5070 Ti’s measured data and the architectural specifications of both products.

Architecture Differences

The two products diverge fundamentally in silicon design, manufacturing, and feature sets. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 series. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

The Intel part integrates its graphics into the processor package. Its bus interface is IGP, meaning it shares system memory rather than using dedicated VRAM. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as “System Shared” or “System Dependent.” The NVIDIA card employs 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. It includes 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Intel part has no tensor core count listed. Pixel rate for the Intel part is 48.00 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA card reaches 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 96.00 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel and 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio on the Intel side, while NVIDIA achieves 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti runs a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2452 MHz. Power consumption differs drastically: the Intel integrated part has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card consumes 300 W and requires a single 16-pin connector. The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA card is 700 W.

API support is identical on paper. Both products list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the Intel part is “Portable Device Dependent,” whereas the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Physical dimensions are only recorded for the NVIDIA card: 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width, occupying a dual-slot form factor. The Intel part is an IGP with no separate dimensions.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 300 W TDP of the RTX 5070 Ti. It requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU, making it suitable for compact, low-power systems where dedicated graphics cards cannot fit. Its IGP bus interface and system-shared memory mean it occupies no expansion slot and adds no physical bulk. The 3 nm process node gives it a manufacturing advantage in density, though transistor counts are undisclosed. Its 10 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support within an integrated solution.

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every recorded performance metric and in memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth vastly exceeds the system-shared memory approach of the Intel part. The 8,960 shading units deliver 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, which is 7.15 times the Intel part’s 6.144 TFLOPS. The 280 tensor cores enable AI workloads that the Intel part cannot match, given no tensor core listing. The 70 RT cores support more robust ray tracing than the Intel part’s 10.

In benchmark percentile terms, the RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile. The NVIDIA card’s nearest rivals include the RX Vega 64, Arc A550M, RX 6900 XT, and RX 6800 XT, all with average scores within 3.1% of its own. This places the RTX 5070 Ti in a competitive mid-to-high tier. The Arc Pro B370 has no rivals listed because no benchmark data exists for it.

The RTX 5070 Ti also wins in interface and display flexibility. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 bus provides high bandwidth for a discrete card, while the Intel IGP relies on system memory. The NVIDIA card outputs to HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connections, whereas the Intel display outputs depend on the portable device’s design. The RTX 5070 Ti’s 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s fill-rate figures dwarf the Intel part’s 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s.

The Verdict

The database shows two products with completely different roles. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor designed for low-power portable devices. Its 25 W TDP, 3 nm process, and system-shared memory make it a component within a larger system, not a standalone add-in card. Its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 10 RT cores are respectable for an IGP but cannot compete with discrete graphics.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a high-performance discrete GPU. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, 16 GB GDDR7, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 70 RT cores place it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 49,957 sits within 2% of the RX 6900 XT and 3.1% above the RX 6800 XT, confirming its position as a strong mid-to-high-end option. The 300 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU reflect its performance ambitions.

Users requiring a discrete graphics card with ray tracing, tensor cores, and dedicated VRAM should select the RTX 5070 Ti. Users needing an integrated solution for a portable device with minimal power draw should rely on the Arc Pro B370. The data does not support a direct performance comparison because only one product has recorded benchmarks. The RTX 5070 Ti’s measured results and architectural specs clearly target high-end workloads, while the Arc Pro B370 targets efficiency and integration.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49,957. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of zero with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each product?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin connector, and requires a 700 W suggested PSU.

Q: Do both support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the closest competitors to the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.1% below), Intel Arc A550M (0.4% above), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2% above), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (3.1% below), based on average scores.

Q: What is the physical form factor of each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with no separate slot width or dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti:

• Chip: Panther Lake versus GB203
• Architecture: Xe3-LPG versus Blackwell 2.0
• Generation: Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) versus GeForce 50
• Process node: 3 nm versus 5 nm
• Foundry: Intel versus TSMC
• Transistors: unknown versus 45,600 million
• Die size: unknown versus 378 mm²
• Transistor density: not listed versus 120.6M / mm²
• Base clock: 300 MHz versus 2295 MHz
• Boost clock: 2400 MHz versus 2452 MHz
• Memory clock: System Shared versus 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
• Memory size: System Shared versus 16 GB
• Memory type: System Shared versus GDDR7
• Memory bus width: System Shared versus 256 bit
• Memory bandwidth: System Dependent versus 896.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 1280 versus 8960
• TMUs: 40 versus 280
• ROPs: 20 versus 96
• RT cores: 10 versus 70
• Tensor cores: not listed versus 280
• Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: 6.144 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 25 W versus 300 W
• Slot width: IGP versus Dual-slot
• Power connectors: None versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: not listed versus 700 W
• Bus interface: IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• Dimensions: not listed versus 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width
• Release date: 2026-01-26 versus 2025-02-19
• Predecessor: HD Graphics-WM versus GeForce 40
• Successor: not listed versus GeForce 60
• Launch MSRP: not listed versus 749 USD
• Average benchmark score: 0 versus 49,957
• Percentile vs all GPUs: 50 versus 86