AMD Radeon RX 7700S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7700S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti occupy very different corners of the GPU landscape, yet aggregate benchmark data places them surprisingly close. The RX 7700S posts an average benchmark score of 52,505, while the RTX 5070 Ti scores 52,086, a difference of only 0.8%. This near-parity in overall averages masks a stark divergence in individual workloads, where the NVIDIA card dominates every head-to-head test by a wide margin. The data suggests two fundamentally different products that happen to converge on similar composite numbers, raising questions about what those averages truly represent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous: the RTX 5070 Ti wins all three recorded comparisons, and it wins by massive margins. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 6,604 against the RX 7700S’s 2,185, a delta of -66.9% for the AMD card. This is not a close contest; the NVIDIA part delivers roughly three times the performance in this modern DirectX 12 test. The gap speaks to raw rendering throughput, where the RTX 5070 Ti’s architecture and specifications simply overwhelm the smaller RX 7700S.

Geekbench OpenCL tells a similar story. The RTX 5070 Ti scores 231,226, while the RX 7700S manages 69,728, a -69.8% delta. This compute-oriented benchmark highlights the massive difference in raw execution resources. The RTX 5070 Ti carries 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines, compared to the RX 7700S’s 2,048 shaders, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Such a disparity in core counts translates directly into the observed OpenCL performance gap.

Vulkan results follow the same pattern. The RTX 5070 Ti posts 227,554, against the RX 7700S’s 85,603, a delta of -62.4%. While the percentage gap is slightly smaller than in OpenCL, the absolute difference remains enormous. Across all three tests, the RX 7700S fails to secure a single win, and its best relative showing is still a 62.4% deficit. The average benchmark score parity, therefore, comes from the RX 7700S having fewer but higher-scoring individual benchmarks in its profile, not from competitive head-to-head performance.

FAQ

Q: How close are the two GPUs in average benchmark scores?

A: The RX 7700S averages 52,505, while the RTX 5070 Ti averages 52,086. The RTX 5070 Ti trails by just 0.8%, and the RX 7700S leads by the same margin in its nearestRivals listing. This makes them statistical neighbors despite their architectural differences.

Q: Which GPU wins in DirectX 12 workloads?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti wins decisively in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 6,604 versus 2,185 for the RX 7700S, a -66.9% delta. The NVIDIA card’s advantage in this modern DX12 test is roughly threefold.

Q: What about OpenCL compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti dominates OpenCL, scoring 231,226 against the RX 7700S’s 69,728, a -69.8% delta. This reflects the NVIDIA part’s substantially higher shader and texture unit counts.

Q: Is the RX 7700S competitive in any benchmark?

A: In the recorded head-to-head tests, the RX 7700S does not win a single benchmark. Its nearest rival comparisons show it ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 1.7% and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 1.8%, but those are not direct comparisons with the RTX 5070 Ti.

Q: How do their percentile rankings compare?

A: The RX 7700S sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 87th percentile. Despite the RTX 5070 Ti’s overwhelming head-to-head wins, the percentile rankings place them one point apart.

Q: What explains the near-identical average scores?

A: The RX 7700S has only three benchmark entries, all in compute-heavy or synthetic tests, while the RTX 5070 Ti has ten entries including PassMark tests. The RTX 5070 Ti’s additional PassMark scores, which are lower in some cases (e.g., 127 in DirectX 12), drag its average down, while the RX 7700S’s smaller sample skews higher.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design philosophies. The RX 7700S uses AMD’s Navi 33 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. It is built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, uses NVIDIA’s GB203 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 generation, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² die, for a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

These process and density differences hint at the performance gap. The RTX 5070 Ti packs over three times the transistors into a die that is less than twice the size, indicating a far more complex and dense design. Memory configurations diverge sharply as well. The RX 7700S offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti doubles capacity to 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s — more than three times the bandwidth. Clock speeds also differ, with the RX 7700S boosting to 2500 MHz and the RTX 5070 Ti boosting to 2452 MHz, but the NVIDIA card’s higher base clock of 2295 MHz versus 1500 MHz suggests better sustained performance characteristics.

Feature sets diverge further. The RX 7700S has 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workloads that the AMD part cannot match. The RTX 5070 Ti also supports a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio at 43.94 TFLOPS each, whereas the RX 7700S offers FP16 at 40.96 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio but only 20.48 TFLOPS for FP32. Power envelopes differ dramatically: the RX 7700S draws 100 W with no external power connectors, designed as an integrated graphics package (IGP), while the RTX 5070 Ti consumes 300 W and requires a single 16-pin connector with a 700 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm, while the RX 7700S’s dimensions are listed as portable-device dependent.

The Verdict

The data points to one clear conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti is the superior performer in every recorded benchmark, and by margins that are not subtle. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it leads by 66.9%; in Geekbench OpenCL, by 69.8%; and in Geekbench Vulkan, by 62.4%. These are not incremental gains but generational leaps in output. The RX 7700S, with its 100 W power draw and IGP form factor, is designed for mobile or compact systems where power efficiency and physical footprint take priority over absolute speed. The RTX 5070 Ti, with its 300 W TDP and dual-slot cooler, targets desktop performance enthusiasts who accept higher power consumption for maximum frame rates.

Yet the aggregate scores complicate a simple “one is better” narrative. The RX 7700S’s average of 52,505 actually edges out the RTX 5070 Ti’s 52,086, and its percentile ranking of 88 beats the NVIDIA card’s 87. These numbers, however, derive from a smaller benchmark set. The RX 7700S’s three tests are all high-scoring relative to its head-to-head performance, while the RTX 5070 Ti’s ten tests include lower PassMark scores that depress its average. A buyer relying solely on average scores might mistakenly assume parity, but the head-to-head data reveals the RTX 5070 Ti as the only genuine contender for demanding workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti also holds advantages in memory capacity and bandwidth, both of which matter for modern games and compute tasks. Its 16 GB GDDR7 buffer and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth dwarf the RX 7700S’s 8 GB and 288.0 GB/s. For users who prioritize longevity or run VRAM-heavy applications, the NVIDIA card’s memory subsystem alone justifies its selection. The RX 7700S, meanwhile, offers a compelling package for ultra-portable systems where its 100 W TDP and lack of power connectors enable slim designs. The verdict, therefore, depends on context: the RTX 5070 Ti wins on performance, while the RX 7700S wins on integration efficiency.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The RX 7700S uses a 6 nm process, while the RTX 5070 Ti uses 5 nm. Transistor counts are 13,300 million versus 45,600 million, and die sizes are 204 mm² versus 378 mm². Transistor densities are 65.2 million per mm² for AMD and 120.6 million per mm² for NVIDIA. Base clocks are 1500 MHz versus 2295 MHz, and boost clocks are 2500 MHz versus 2452 MHz. Memory clocks differ at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RX 7700S and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5070 Ti.

Memory capacity is 8 GB GDDR6 for AMD versus 16 GB GDDR7 for NVIDIA. Bus widths are 128-bit versus 256-bit, yielding bandwidths of 288.0 GB/s and 896.0 GB/s respectively. Shading units number 2,048 for the RX 7700S and 8,960 for the RTX 5070 Ti. TMUs are 128 versus 280, and ROPs are 64 versus 96. Ray tracing cores are 32 versus 70, with the NVIDIA card adding 280 tensor cores that the AMD part lacks entirely. Pixel rates are 160.0 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 320.0 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s.

FP32 compute is 20.48 TFLOPS for AMD and 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 is 40.96 TFLOPS (2:1) for AMD and 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA. Power consumption is 100 W versus 300 W, with the RX 7700S requiring no power connector and the RTX 5070 Ti requiring one 16-pin connector plus a 700 W suggested PSU. Slot widths are IGP versus dual-slot, and physical dimensions are portable-device dependent versus 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device dependent for AMD, while NVIDIA offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Release dates are January 3, 2023 for the RX 7700S and February 19, 2025 for the RTX 5070 Ti. The RTX 5070 Ti also has a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the RTX 5070 Ti wins in every recorded performance category. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,604 versus 2,185 indicates superiority in modern DirectX 12 gaming workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 231,226 versus 69,728 shows dominance in general-purpose compute. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 227,554 versus 85,603 demonstrates strength in Vulkan-based applications. There is no benchmark in the head-to-head set where the RX 7700S emerges victorious.

The RX 7700S, however, wins in non-performance categories implied by the data. Its 100 W TDP and IGP slot width suggest it is intended for systems where power efficiency and minimal space are critical, such as thin-and-light laptops or compact all-in-one designs. The lack of power connectors reinforces this, as does the portable-device-dependent display output specification. The RTX 5070 Ti, with its 300 W draw, dual-slot footprint, and 304 mm length, requires a desktop chassis with substantial airflow and a robust power supply.

In terms of raw specifications, the RTX 5070 Ti wins on every compute metric: higher shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more RT cores, and the presence of tensor cores. It also wins on memory bandwidth and capacity. The RX 7700S wins on power draw and physical integration, making it the