Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: a comparison between an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W power envelope and a triple-slot discrete card with 285 W rated power. The database records show the Intel part at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card sits at the 76th percentile. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds an average benchmark score of 31,087 and sits within 1.9% of several high-end competitors. These two products occupy different segments, yet the data allows a structured comparison of architecture, specifications, and expected performance.

The Verdict

The recorded data places the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER as the clear performance leader. Its average benchmark score of 31,087 across ten recorded tests dwarfs the Arc Pro B370, which has zero recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches the 76th percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. For any workload requiring substantial graphics throughput, the NVIDIA card is the only choice based on the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, however, is not without purpose. Its 25 W TDP and integrated graphics package (IGP slot width, no power connectors) indicate a low-power solution for portable devices. The database lists its display outputs as "Portable Device Dependent," which suggests a target market of laptops or compact systems where power draw and physical footprint matter more than raw frame rates. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, with a 285 W TDP, a 310 mm length, and a triple-slot cooler, cannot fit into such scenarios.

The production status differs: the Intel part is "Active," while the NVIDIA part is "End-of-life" with a successor listed as GeForce 50. So, for new system builds in 2026 and beyond, the Intel product remains available, whereas the NVIDIA card is a previous-generation product. The release dates confirm the gap: the Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched on 2024-01-23. The data does not support any scenario where the Intel part outperforms the NVIDIA card, but it does support a scenario where the NVIDIA card is unavailable or unsuitable due to power, size, or availability constraints.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node advantage goes to Intel (3 nm vs 5 nm), but the transistor counts tell a different story: the NVIDIA chip has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a density of 121.1M per mm². The Intel chip lists transistors and die size as "unknown," so a direct density comparison is impossible.

The NVIDIA card features 8,448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, 66 ray tracing cores, and 264 tensor cores. The Intel part has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. The architecture generational difference is clear: Ada Lovelace supports dedicated tensor cores for AI workloads, while Xe3-LPG does not list tensor hardware. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses "System Shared" memory, with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent." This means the Intel part has no dedicated VRAM and relies on system memory, which is a fundamental architectural limitation for high-bandwidth tasks. The NVIDIA card's memory clock is 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective), while the Intel part's memory clock is also "System Shared."

Clock speeds show the NVIDIA card running a base of 2340 MHz and boost of 2610 MHz. The Intel part has a base of 300 MHz and boost of 2400 MHz. The lower base clock for Intel is typical for an integrated part, but the boost clock reaches near parity with the discrete card. However, the shading unit count difference (1,280 vs 8,448) overwhelms any clock advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31,087 across ten recorded tests. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and requires a 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Q: Are the API supports different?

A: No. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores.

Q: Can the Intel GPU be installed in a desktop PCIe slot?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP bus interface and has an IGP slot width, meaning it is integrated into a processor package. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the memory capacity of the NVIDIA card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with no dedicated VRAM.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. Process node: Intel uses 3 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm. Foundry: Intel uses its own fabs, NVIDIA uses TSMC. Transistors: NVIDIA lists 45,900 million, Intel lists unknown. Die size: NVIDIA lists 379 mm², Intel lists unknown. Base clock: Intel 300 MHz, NVIDIA 2340 MHz. Boost clock: Intel 2400 MHz, NVIDIA 2610 MHz. Memory: Intel system shared, NVIDIA 16 GB GDDR6X with 256-bit bus and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. Shading units: 1,280 vs 8,448. TMUs: 40 vs 264. ROPs: 20 vs 96. RT cores: 10 vs 66. Tensor cores: none listed vs 264. Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s vs 250.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s vs 689.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 6.144 TFLOPS vs 44.10 TFLOPS. FP16: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) vs 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP: 25 W vs 285 W. Slot width: IGP vs triple-slot. Power connectors: none vs 1x 16-pin. Bus interface: IGP vs PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: portable-device-dependent vs 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions: NVIDIA lists 310 mm length, 140 mm height, 61 mm width; Intel lists none. Production status: Active vs End-of-life. Release date: 2026-01-26 vs 2024-01-23. Launch MSRP: the NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 799 USD; Intel has none.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The wins columns show 0 for both parts. Instead, the comparison relies on the NVIDIA card's recorded benchmarks and the Intel part's absence of scores. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 5,569 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, 199,267 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 53,683 in Geekbench Vulkan. It also records Passmark scores: 181 in DirectX 10, 278 in DirectX 11, 119 in DirectX 12, 360 in DirectX 9, 1,225 in G2D, 31,811 in G3D, and 18,372 in GPU Compute.

The Intel part has no corresponding numbers. The data shows a zero average benchmark score, which means no test has been submitted or recorded for this GPU. The percentile ranking of 50 for Intel versus 76 for NVIDIA indicates a massive gap in measured performance. The NVIDIA card's nearest rivals in the database all sit within a narrow band: the Quadro M5000 at 31,206 (delta -0.4%), the GRID M60-1Q at 31,220 (delta -0.4%), the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell at 31,532 (delta -1.4%), and the TITAN RTX at 31,676 (delta -1.9%). The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average of 31,087 places it slightly below all of these, but within 1.9% of each. This clustering shows that the NVIDIA card performs at the level of previous flagship and professional cards, even as it has been superseded.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins on every recorded performance metric. Its FP32 throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS is 7.2 times the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s is 5.2 times higher than 48.00 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s is 7.2 times higher than 96.00 GTexel/s. The shading unit count of 8,448 is 6.6 times higher than 1,280. The ray tracing core count of 66 is 6.6 times higher than 10. Memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s versus system-dependent bandwidth gives the NVIDIA card a decisive edge in memory-intensive workloads. The recorded 3DMark and Geekbench scores confirm that this card delivers high-end discrete performance.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency and physical integration. Its 25 W TDP is 11.4 times lower than the NVIDIA card's 285 W. It requires no power connectors, uses an IGP form factor, and has no suggested PSU requirement. The NVIDIA card, by contrast, needs a 600 W PSU, a triple-slot cooler, and a 310 mm length. For a portable device, the Intel part is the only feasible option. Its 3 nm process node also indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology, though the database does not quantify the transistor density for Intel.

In terms of availability, the Intel part is listed as "Active" with a 2026 release date, while the NVIDIA card is "End-of-life" with a 2024 release date. Systems requiring a current-generation product with ongoing production support would favor the Intel part. Systems requiring maximum performance would favor the NVIDIA card, provided the user accepts its power draw and size. The data does not show any benchmark where the Intel part wins, so the use-case split is clear: the Intel Arc Pro B370 serves low-power integrated scenarios, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER serves high-performance discrete workloads.