Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison
Intel Arc Pro B370
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data separates these two products into entirely different performance classes. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti holds every benchmark win in the database, with a clean sweep across all ten recorded tests. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no benchmark entries at all, meaning its performance profile cannot be quantified through the same measurement suite.
The RTX 4070 Ti delivers its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads. Its Passmark G3D score of 31,624 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 18,396 indicate substantial rasterization and general compute throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 176,953 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 213,808 further reinforce this pattern, showing strong cross-API performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 5,024 places it firmly in the modern DirectX 12 gaming segment.
The Intel part occupies a different niche entirely. With a 25 W TDP and integrated graphics processor (IGP) form factor, it targets low-power, portable systems. Its architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, matching the API compatibility of the NVIDIA part. However, the absence of recorded benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm any specific workload where the Intel solution wins outright.
The percentile data reinforces this gap. The RTX 4070 Ti sits at the 84th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile. That 34-point percentile difference translates into a substantial practical gap, even without direct head-to-head measurements.
Architecture Differences
The two products use fundamentally different silicon. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on Panther Lake silicon using the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC.
Transistor counts and die sizes diverge sharply. The database lists the RTX 4070 Ti as having 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Intel part's transistor count and die size are both listed as unknown, which limits direct comparison of silicon complexity.
The RTX 4070 Ti integrates 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores, while the Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. This difference matters for workloads that rely on dedicated hardware acceleration. The NVIDIA part also has far more shading units at 7,680 versus 1,280, along with 240 texture mapping units versus 40, and 80 render output units versus 20.
Memory architecture differs completely. The RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth listed as system-dependent. This means the Intel part's memory performance varies with the host platform, while the NVIDIA part has fixed dedicated memory resources.
Power delivery reflects their different roles. The RTX 4070 Ti has a 285 W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector and a 600 W suggested PSU. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and operates as an integrated graphics processor. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot and 285 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 42 mm wide. The Intel part has no listed dimensions, consistent with its IGP status.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two products. The wins tally shows zero for the Intel part and zero for the NVIDIA part in direct comparisons. However, the RTX 4070 Ti has ten individual benchmark scores that define its performance envelope.
The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test produced a score of 5,024 for the RTX 4070 Ti. This modern DirectX 12 benchmark stresses ray tracing and mesh shading, areas where the 60 RT cores and Ada Lovelace architecture provide substantial hardware support. The Arc Pro B370's 10 RT cores would face a significant workload in this test, though no score exists to quantify the gap.
Geekbench results for the RTX 4070 Ti show 176,953 in OpenCL and 213,808 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score exceeding the OpenCL score by roughly 21% suggests strong driver optimization for that API. Passmark results show a different pattern: DirectX 11 scored 288, DirectX 10 scored 187, DirectX 12 scored 116, and DirectX 9 scored 352. The older DirectX 9 result being highest indicates legacy API performance remains solid, while DirectX 12 shows the lowest score among the API-specific tests.
Passmark G2D scored 1,200 for the RTX 4070 Ti, a measure of 2D acceleration that matters less for gaming but affects desktop responsiveness. The G3D score of 31,624 and GPU compute score of 18,396 complete the picture. The average benchmark score across all ten tests is 44,795, placing the card at the 84th percentile.
The nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 Ti provide context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile averages 45,152, which is 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT averages 45,384, 1.3% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 averages 44,075, 1.6% lower. The Intel Arc A730M averages 45,592, 1.7% higher. These deltas are all within roughly 2%, indicating the RTX 4070 Ti clusters tightly with these competitors despite being a desktop discrete card.
Specification Differences
The two products differ across nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Arc Pro B370 operates at a 300 MHz base clock and 2,400 MHz boost clock. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti runs at 2,310 MHz base and 2,610 MHz boost. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared, while the NVIDIA part runs at 1,313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.
Compute throughput shows the largest gap. The Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.09 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part is roughly 6.5 times faster in FP32 and about 3.3 times faster in FP16.
Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The Intel part produces 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part produces 208.8 GPixel/s and 626.4 GTexel/s. These rates reflect the shading unit and TMU counts, with the NVIDIA part having 6 times the shading units, 6 times the TMUs, and 4 times the ROPs.
The RTX 4070 Ti has 240 tensor cores, which support AI and deep learning workloads. The Arc Pro B370 has no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP interface. Display outputs differ as well: the RTX 4070 Ti provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Intel part's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.
Production status and release dates separate them further. The Arc Pro B370 is listed as Active with a release date of January 26, 2026, and its predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. The RTX 4070 Ti is End-of-life with a release date of January 2, 2023, and its predecessor is GeForce 30, with successor GeForce 50. The NVIDIA card had a launch MSRP of 799 USD.
FAQ
Q: Which product has higher raw compute throughput?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc Pro B370, a difference of roughly 6.5 times in favor of NVIDIA.
Q: How do their power requirements compare?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has a 285 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and lists a 600 W suggested PSU.
Q: What memory configurations do they use?
A: The Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA part uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: Are both products still in production?
A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is listed as Active with a January 2026 release date. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is End-of-life, having launched in January 2023.
Q: Which product has more ray tracing cores?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 60 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores.
Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score and percentile?
A: The RTX 4070 Ti averages 44,795 across ten benchmarks and sits at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile.
The Verdict
The data presents a clear separation of roles. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a high-performance discrete graphics card designed for demanding workloads. Its 84th percentile ranking, 40.09 TFLOPS FP32, and 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth place it in the upper tier of the database. The ten recorded benchmark scores confirm strong performance across DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan APIs. Its 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads.
The Intel Arc Pro B370 targets an entirely different use case. Its 25 W TDP, IGP form factor, and system-shared memory indicate a low-power integrated solution for portable devices. The 3 nm process and Xe3-LPG architecture represent modern design, but the lack of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm its performance level. The 50th percentile placement suggests mid-range positioning among all GPUs, though this is not supported by direct measurements.
Users requiring maximum graphics throughput, dedicated memory, and hardware ray tracing should select the RTX 4070 Ti. The data confirms it outperforms the Intel part by every measurable specification. Users needing an energy-efficient integrated graphics solution for a portable device would find the Arc Pro B370 more aligned with that requirement, given its 25 W power envelope and no connector requirements. The RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life, while the Arc Pro B370 is active, which may influence availability. The choice depends entirely on whether the workload demands discrete-level performance or minimal power consumption.