NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER are two closely related Ada Lovelace GPUs that share the same AD104 chip, 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, and a 192-bit memory bus. The benchmark data reveals a consistent, though not overwhelming, performance advantage for the RTX 4070 Ti across every single test, making the choice between them a matter of how much that consistent edge is worth in a specific use case.

Where Each One Wins

The data presents a clear-cut scenario: the RTX 4070 Ti wins in all 10 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. There are no tests where the RTX 4070 SUPER comes out ahead. This makes a use-case split less about different workloads favoring different cards and more about the magnitude of the RTX 4070 Ti’s lead in various scenarios.

The RTX 4070 Ti’s largest victory is in the synthetic DirectX 10 benchmark, where it posts a 12% delta over the SUPER. This suggests that in legacy or lighter API workloads, the higher clock speeds and additional shading units of the Ti provide a disproportionate benefit. Its lead narrows in more modern and compute-oriented tests. For instance, in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Ti is ahead by 8.6%, and in Geekbench OpenCL, the lead shrinks to just 2.4%. This pattern indicates that while the Ti holds a solid lead in rasterization-heavy tasks, the gap closes significantly when the workload scales across many cores or utilizes the GPU's compute capabilities, where the SUPER’s architecture is relatively more efficient.

For users focused on the latest DirectX 12 titles, the RTX 4070 Ti’s 8.6% lead in the Steel Nomad benchmark translates to a tangible, though not transformative, frame rate advantage. Conversely, for general-purpose GPU compute tasks like OpenCL workloads, the 2.4% delta is nearly negligible, meaning the SUPER could be seen as the more balanced choice if its lower power consumption is a factor. The RTX 4070 Ti also wins in Vulkan by 4%, indicating a moderate edge in cross-platform APIs. The data suggests the RTX 4070 Ti is the unequivocal performance pick, while the SUPER’s appeal lies not in winning any single benchmark but in its overall efficiency profile and lower power draw.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs are built on the same fundamental architecture, but the RTX 4070 Ti is the more fully featured implementation. They share the AD104 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with an identical 35,800 million transistor count and a die size of 294 mm². The core differences lie in the number of active execution units and clock speeds.

The RTX 4070 Ti is configured with 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 60 ray tracing cores. In contrast, the RTX 4070 SUPER has 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 56 ray tracing cores. This represents a roughly 7% reduction in the SUPER’s core count. Both cards have 80 raster operation units (ROPs) and 240 tensor cores on the Ti versus 224 on the SUPER. The Ti also operates at higher frequencies, with a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz, compared to the SUPER’s 1980 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost. This combined advantage in both core count and clock speed is why the Ti achieves a higher FP32 performance of 40.09 TFLOPS versus the SUPER’s 35.48 TFLOPS.

Memory configurations are identical: 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, yielding the same 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth and a 1313 MHz memory clock (21 Gbps effective). The most significant architectural divergence is power. The RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W, while the RTX 4070 SUPER draws substantially less at 220 W with a 550 W suggested PSU. This efficiency gap is the key differentiator. The SUPER delivers most of the Ti’s performance at a significantly lower power envelope, which has implications for thermal management and system requirements. The physical dimensions also differ slightly, with the Ti being longer at 285 mm (11.2 inches) versus the SUPER’s 267 mm (10.5 inches). Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector and identical display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The Verdict

From a pure performance standpoint, the data offers no ambiguity: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the faster card. It wins every single benchmark in the comparison, with deltas ranging from a minimal 1.4% in the Passmark G2D test to a substantial 12% in the Passmark DirectX 10 test. Its average benchmark score of 44795 places it at the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the SUPER’s average of 43223 places it at the 83rd percentile. This confirms the Ti’s position as a slightly higher-tier product.

The choice, therefore, is not about which card is faster, but about whether the performance gap justifies the other trade-offs. The RTX 4070 Ti is the choice for users who want the maximum frame rates and compute performance available in this chip class, and who have a power supply and case that can accommodate its higher 285 W TDP and longer 285 mm length. The RTX 4070 SUPER is the more rational pick for users who prioritize efficiency. Its 220 W TDP means less heat, lower electricity draw, and a more modest 550 W PSU requirement. The performance difference is real but not enormous; for example, the 5.4% gap in the Passmark G3D test is unlikely to be night-and-day in most gaming scenarios. The SUPER offers nearly all of the Ti’s capability for a lower power cost. The data implies that the SUPER is the more balanced product, sacrificing a small amount of performance for a significant reduction in power draw, while the Ti is the uncompromising performance variant.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is faster, scoring 5024 points compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 4627 points, a difference of 8.6%.

Q: How much of a lead does the RTX 4070 Ti have in compute performance?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176953 versus 172795 for the SUPER, a lead of 2.4%. In the Passmark GPU Compute test, the Ti is ahead by 7.5%, scoring 18396 to the SUPER’s 17108.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the RTX 4070 SUPER wins?

A: No. Across all 10 head-to-head benchmarks, including tests for DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and 2D graphics, the RTX 4070 Ti wins every single matchup.

Q: What are the key differences in memory configuration?

A: There are no differences. Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing an identical bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: Which card has a lower power consumption?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has a significantly lower TDP of 220 W compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 W. The SUPER also has a lower suggested PSU requirement of 550 W versus 600 W.

Q: What are the major architectural differences between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has more execution resources, including 7680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 60 RT cores, versus the SUPER’s 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 56 RT cores. The Ti also has higher base and boost clock speeds.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark suite shows a comprehensive victory for the RTX 4070 Ti, but the margin of victory varies significantly by test type. The largest performance gap appears in the legacy Passmark DirectX 10 test, where the RTX 4070 Ti scores 187 points, a full 12% higher than the SUPER’s 167. This suggests that the Ti’s higher clock speeds and core count give it a disproportionate advantage in less parallel, older API workloads. A similar trend is seen in the Passmark DirectX 11 test, where the Ti wins by 5.5% (288 vs. 273).

Moving to more modern APIs, the RTX 4070 Ti maintains a solid lead. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 5024 versus 4627, an 8.6% advantage. This is the most significant win in a current-generation API and indicates a clear performance tier separation for modern gaming. The lead narrows in the Geekbench Vulkan test, with the Ti ahead by 4% (213808 vs. 205624). This shows that in Vulkan, the architectural efficiency of the SUPER is able to close some of the gap, but it still trails.

Compute-heavy workloads show the smallest differences. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176953, just 2.4% ahead of the SUPER’s 172795. This is the smallest delta in the entire suite, suggesting that when the GPU is saturated with general-purpose compute tasks, the advantage of the Ti’s extra cores is mitigated. The Passmark GPU Compute test shows a more pronounced 7.5% lead for the Ti (18396 vs. 17108), indicating that this particular test scales well with the Ti’s additional resources. Finally, in the synthetic 3D gaming test, Passmark G3D, the Ti is ahead by 5.4% (31624 vs. 29995), which is a representative figure for overall gaming performance. Even the 2D graphics test (Passmark G2D) shows the Ti winning, albeit by a narrow 1.4% (1200 vs. 1184), demonstrating that its dominance extends to all facets of the GPU’s operation.

Specification Differences

The following specifications highlight the key differences between the two NVIDIA GPUs, with all other major features like memory size, type, bus width, bandwidth, and display outputs being identical.

• Shading Units: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 7680; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 7168
• Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 240; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 224
• Ray Tracing Cores: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 60; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 56
• Tensor Cores: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 240; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 224
• Base Clock: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 2310 MHz; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 1980 MHz
• Boost Clock: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 2610 MHz; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 2475 MHz
• Pixel Rate: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 208.8 GPixel/s; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 198.0 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 626.4 GTexel/s; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 554.4 GTexel/s
• FP32 Performance: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 40.09 TFLOPS; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 35.48 TFLOPS
• TDP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 285 W; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 220 W
• Suggested PSU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 600 W; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 550 W
• Length: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 285 mm (11.2 inches); NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 267 mm (10.5 inches)
• Launch MSRP: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 799 USD; NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: 599 USD