Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 presents two fundamentally different products with distinct intended use cases. The Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on Intel's Panther Lake platform, while the RTX 4070 AD103 is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board from NVIDIA's GeForce 40-series. The recorded data shows the RTX 4070 AD103 delivers substantially higher raw compute throughput across every measured metric. Its FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS, a 4.74x advantage. Pixel fill rate favors the NVIDIA part at 158.4 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate favors it at 455.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 AD103 also carries 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores, compared to the Intel part's 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The Arc Pro B370 has no tensor cores listed. For any workload that stresses the GPU, the RTX 4070 AD103 is the clear performer. However, the Arc Pro B370 draws only 25 W of power as an integrated solution, whereas the RTX 4070 AD103 consumes 200 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part occupies no expansion slot and uses no power connectors, making it suitable for compact, low-power systems where the GPU must share system memory. The RTX 4070 AD103, with its dedicated 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, is the choice for memory-intensive workloads. The Arc Pro B370's memory bandwidth is system dependent, a considerable constraint. The data indicates the RTX 4070 AD103 is the superior GPU for performance, while the Arc Pro B370 serves a niche where power efficiency and integration take priority. The RTX 4070 AD103 is marked end-of-life in the database, with the Arc Pro B370 listed as active. The RTX 4070 AD103 has a successor in the GeForce 50 series, while the Arc Pro B370 has none listed.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel, featuring the Panther Lake chip. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, featuring the AD103 chip. The database records 45,900 million transistors on the RTX 4070 AD103 with a die size of 379 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Arc Pro B370's transistor count and die size are marked unknown. Clock behavior differs significantly. The Arc Pro B370 runs at a 300 MHz base clock and boosts to 2400 MHz. The RTX 4070 AD103 runs at a 1920 MHz base clock and boosts to 2475 MHz. Memory architecture diverges sharply: the Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 4070 AD103 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock on the NVIDIA part is 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4070 AD103 includes 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores, while the Arc Pro B370 lists 10 RT cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 4070 AD103's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1), whereas the Arc Pro B370 achieves 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 using a 2:1 ratio relative to its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors, a 25 W TDP, and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The NVIDIA part is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 200 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B370. Pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and a 1313 MHz memory clock (21 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and bus width.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX 4070 AD103 has a 200 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and RT cores?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 has 5888 shading units and 46 RT cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units and 10 RT cores. The RTX 4070 AD103 also has 184 tensor cores; the Arc Pro B370 has none listed.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro B370 is listed as Active with a release date of January 26, 2026. The RTX 4070 AD103 is listed as End-of-life with a release date of February 29, 2024. The RTX 4070 AD103 has a successor in the GeForce 50 series; the Arc Pro B370 has no successor listed.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1920 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2475 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 504.2 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 40 | 184 |

| ROPs | 20 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 10 | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 184 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 158.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 455.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 200 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | null | 240 mm 9.4 inches x 110 mm 4.3 inches x 40 mm 1.6 inches |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2024-02-29 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | null | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | null | 599 USD |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct benchmark scores for either GPU, leaving the comparison to the recorded specification-derived metrics. The most decisive advantage for the RTX 4070 AD103 appears in FP32 compute. At 29.15 TFLOPS, it outperforms the Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS by a factor of 4.74. This gap reflects the NVIDIA part's 5888 shading units operating at a 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost clock, compared to the Intel part's 1280 shading units at a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The FP16 comparison further illustrates the architectural difference: the RTX 4070 AD103 sustains 29.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc Pro B370 reaches 12.29 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 4070 AD103's texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s is 4.74x the Arc Pro B370's 96.00 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s is 3.3x the Arc Pro B370's 48.00 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth presents the largest performance gulf: the RTX 4070 AD103's dedicated 504.2 GB/s versus the Arc Pro B370's system dependent figure. The RTX 4070 AD103 also holds a 192-bit memory bus and 12 GB of GDDR6X, while the Arc Pro B370 has no dedicated memory resources. In power efficiency, the Arc Pro B370's 25 W TDP versus the RTX 4070 AD103's 200 W TDP means the Intel part uses 12.5% of the power budget while delivering roughly 21% of the FP32 throughput. This efficiency ratio shows the integrated GPU is not without merit for constrained environments, but the RTX 4070 AD103 remains the dominant performer in every compute metric. The RTX 4070 AD103's 184 tensor cores give it a capability the Arc Pro B370 lacks entirely, and its 46 RT cores outnumber the Intel part's 10 by 4.6x. The RTX 4070 AD103 also offers a higher boost clock at 2475 MHz versus 2400 MHz, though the base clock difference is far larger at 1920 MHz versus 300 MHz. The RTX 4070 AD103's transistor count of 45,900 million and die size of 379 mm² reinforce its position as a high-end discrete GPU, whereas the Arc Pro B370's unknown transistor and die data reflect its integrated nature. The RTX 4070 AD103 carries a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the Arc Pro B370 has no listed launch MSRP. The production statuses differ meaningfully: the RTX 4070 AD103 is end-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, while the Arc Pro B370 is active with no successor listed and a release date later than the NVIDIA part by nearly two years. The RTX 4070 AD103's predecessor is the GeForce 30 series, while the Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. The bus interface also differs, with the RTX 4070 AD103 using PCIe 4.0 x16 and the Arc Pro B370 using IGP. Display outputs on the NVIDIA card include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.