Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B370 versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. However, comparative performance can be inferred from the available benchmark scores and the RTX 4060's placement among its nearest rivals. The Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, with no individual test results recorded, while the RTX 4060 posts a substantial average benchmark score of 17,639 across ten different tests.

The RTX 4060 demonstrates its strongest results in PassMark G3D, where it scores 19,545, and in Geekbench OpenCL, with a score of 95,057. Its PassMark GPU Compute score reaches 9,213, indicating solid general-purpose compute throughput. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4060 records 2,302 points, which reflects modern DirectX 12 workload performance. The Geekbench Vulkan result of 48,643 shows that the card also handles cross-API graphics tasks competently.

The RTX 4060's nearest rivals in the database highlight how tightly grouped its performance is at this tier. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 posts an average score of 17,666, placing it 0.2 percent behind the RTX 4060. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17,588, which is 0.3 percent ahead of the RTX 4060, meaning the integrated Radeon graphics solution actually edges out the discrete RTX 4060 by a narrow margin in the database's average. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 trail by 0.5 and 0.7 percent respectively, with scores of 17,551 and 17,509. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RTX 4060 sits in a performance cluster where small variations in workload mix can flip the ranking.

For the Arc Pro B370, the absence of benchmark records means the database contains no measured wins or losses against the RTX 4060 in any test. The wins tally for both cards is zero in the head-to-head section, confirming that no direct comparison data exists. What can be stated from the recorded figures is that the RTX 4060 delivers 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 2.5 times in raw floating-point throughput. Pixel throughput likewise favors the NVIDIA card at 118.1 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate stands at 236.2 GTexel/s against 96.00 GTexel/s. These disparities appear across every throughput metric recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture built on Intel's 3 nm process node, with the chip designated as Panther Lake. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation and is produced by Intel's own foundry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on TSMC's 5 nm node, with the AD107 chip and 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter.

Core configuration differs sharply. The Arc Pro B370 carries 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. The RTX 4060 carries 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, roughly 2.4 times the shader count and double the TMU and ROP counts. Ray tracing hardware also diverges: the Intel part has 10 RT cores, while the NVIDIA part has 24. Tensor cores appear only on the RTX 4060, which includes 96 of them, enabling the full suite of NVIDIA's AI-accelerated features; the database lists no tensor cores for the Arc Pro B370.

Clock behavior shows a different trade-off. The Arc Pro B370 runs at a 300 MHz base clock and boosts to 2400 MHz. The RTX 4060 runs at 1830 MHz base and 2460 MHz boost. Despite the Intel part's lower base clock, its boost reaches nearly the same level as the NVIDIA card. The memory subsystem separates the two most decisively. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth listed as system dependent, meaning its performance scales with the host platform's memory configuration. The RTX 4060 uses 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth and an effective memory clock of 17 Gbps.

Power and physical characteristics could not be more different. The Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. The RTX 4060 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 115 W TDP, a single 12-pin power connector, a suggested 300 W power supply, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The NVIDIA card measures 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API coverage is identical. Production status diverges: the Arc Pro B370 is active, while the RTX 4060 is end-of-life, with its successor listed as GeForce 50. The release dates also differ, with the RTX 4060 arriving in May 2023 and the Arc Pro B370 in January 2026.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the RTX 4060 occupies a different performance class entirely. Its average benchmark score of 17,639 places it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero due to missing benchmark records. The RTX 4060's nearest rivals, all within 0.7 percent, show that its performance is consistent with established mid-range discrete graphics. The Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no rival entries and no measured scores, so the database cannot place it relative to any known GPU.

For users who need a discrete graphics card with proven DirectX 12, Vulkan, and compute performance, the RTX 4060 has the recorded results to back its placement. Its 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 272.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth, and 8 GB GDDR6 capacity are all recorded figures that support demanding workloads. The Arc Pro B370's system shared memory and system dependent bandwidth mean its actual performance depends entirely on the host platform, a factor that makes direct comparison impossible without additional data.

The RTX 4060's launch MSRP is 299 USD. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded launch MSRP. The RTX 4060 is also end-of-life with a successor already identified, while the Arc Pro B370 is active and has its predecessor listed as HD Graphics-WM. For pure compute throughput, the RTX 4060 delivers more than double the FP32 performance of the Arc Pro B370, and its pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s is nearly 2.5 times higher. The data supports the RTX 4060 as the stronger performer in every recorded metric, though the Arc Pro B370's integrated nature and 25 W TDP point to a different intended role.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 4060 delivers 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS, making the NVIDIA card roughly 2.5 times faster in this metric.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4060's average score of 17,639 is 0.2 percent behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M, 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560, and 0.7 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 460.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 4060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are the APIs supported by both GPUs the same?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption of each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, while the RTX 4060 has a 115 W TDP.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro B370 is listed as active, while the RTX 4060 is listed as end-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 wins on every recorded performance metric in the database. Its shading unit count of 3,072 versus 1,280 gives it a clear advantage in parallel compute workloads. The 24 RT cores versus 10 provide more ray tracing capability. The 96 tensor cores, absent from the Arc Pro B370, enable AI-accelerated features that the Intel part cannot match in the recorded specifications. Dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth removes any dependency on system memory performance, making the RTX 4060 more predictable across different host platforms. Its pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s are both more than double the Arc Pro B370's 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The dual-slot form factor, PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and display outputs including HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections position it as a standalone desktop component.

The Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is less than a quarter of the RTX 4060's 115 W TDP. It requires no power connectors, occupies no expansion slot, and draws memory from the system, which eliminates the cost of dedicated VRAM from a system design perspective. Its 3 nm process node and Intel foundry production represent a newer manufacturing technology than the RTX 4060's 5 nm TSMC node. The IGP bus interface and portable device dependent display outputs indicate the Arc Pro B370 is designed for mobile and compact systems where the RTX 4060's 240 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width would not fit. The Arc Pro B370's active production status and 2026 release date also mean it is a current-generation product, whereas the RTX 4060 is end-of-life with a replacement already in the GeForce 50 series.

For raw performance in desktop workloads, the RTX 4060 is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For power-constrained or space-constrained integrated systems, the Arc Pro B370 offers the only viable path, though its performance remains unmeasured in the database. The 50th percentile ranking of the Arc Pro B370 versus the 61st percentile of the RTX 4060 reflects the database's overall assessment, but the absence of benchmark scores for the Intel part means that ranking is based on specifications rather than measured results.