Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GB10 Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two fundamentally different products. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor built for the Panther Lake mobile platform, while the NVIDIA GB10 is a server-class Blackwell accelerator. Benchmark results indicate the NVIDIA GB10 holds a decisive performance advantage, with an average benchmark score of 117,393 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile.

For workloads that require maximum compute throughput, the NVIDIA GB10 is the clear choice based on its 29.71 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory. The data shows the GB10 outperforms its nearest rivals, sitting 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2.6% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB. The Intel Arc Pro B370, with its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 output and system-shared memory, serves a different purpose entirely: it is an integrated solution for portable devices, drawing only 25 W and requiring no power connectors.

Users who need a self-contained accelerator for AI inference, server deployment, or high-performance computing should select the NVIDIA GB10. Its 384 tensor cores, 48 RT cores, and 6144 shading units deliver the compute density expected from a Blackwell-generation part. The Intel Arc Pro B370 suits systems where power efficiency and integration matter more than raw throughput, as its 25 W TDP and IGP bus interface allow it to operate within a mobile processor package without dedicated cooling or power delivery. The data does not support treating these as direct competitors; they target distinct market segments with different performance envelopes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors derive from entirely different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's Panther Lake chip at a 3 nm process node. The NVIDIA GB10 employs the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process with a 382 mm² die size. Intel's integrated design pairs the GPU directly with the CPU in a mobile package, while NVIDIA's server part uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

Compute resources diverge sharply. The NVIDIA GB10 fields 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, alongside 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 contains 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed. Clock behavior also differs: the Intel part runs at a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, while the NVIDIA part operates at 1665 MHz base and 2418 MHz boost, achieving higher throughput despite a lower boost ceiling due to its much larger execution resource pool.

Memory architecture represents a fundamental split. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, meaning it borrows from the host CPU's main memory. The NVIDIA GB10 carries 128 GB of dedicated LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement removes contention with CPU workloads and provides predictable latency, which matters for server applications.

API support highlights the different use cases. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for consumer and workstation graphics workloads. The NVIDIA GB10 lists no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support, indicating it targets compute and AI applications rather than traditional rendering. The NVIDIA part's display output consists of a single HDMI port, while the Intel part's display outputs are portable device dependent, reflecting its integration into mobile systems.

Power characteristics reinforce the architectural divergence. The Intel Arc Pro B370 draws 25 W with no power connectors, fitting within the thermal budget of a mobile processor. The NVIDIA GB10 consumes 140 W and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, though it also uses no power connectors, suggesting a board-integrated or module form factor. The NVIDIA part measures 150 mm by 51 mm by 150 mm, while the Intel part's dimensions are not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 delivers 29.71 TFLOPS FP32, which is approximately 4.8 times the 6.144 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B370.

Q: How much memory does each GPU provide?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 includes 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, meaning it draws from the host system's main memory with bandwidth that depends on the platform.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The NVIDIA GB10 has a 140 W TDP and also uses no power connectors, but the database lists a 300 W suggested PSU for the system.

Q: Does the NVIDIA GB10 support DirectX or Vulkan?

A: No. The database records N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan on the NVIDIA GB10. The Intel Arc Pro B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores for AI workloads?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 includes 384 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 does not have a tensor core count listed in the database.

Q: What are the release dates for these products?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 was released on October 14, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 3,999 USD. The Intel Arc Pro B370 was released on January 26, 2026, with no launch MSRP recorded.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across every major specification category. Process node: Intel uses 3 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm. Foundry: Intel fabricates its own chip, while TSMC produces the NVIDIA part. Die size is recorded only for the NVIDIA GB10 at 382 mm².

Clock speeds: Intel base clock is 300 MHz with 2400 MHz boost; NVIDIA base clock is 1665 MHz with 2418 MHz boost. Memory clock for NVIDIA is 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective, while Intel's memory clock is system shared.

Memory configuration: Intel uses system-shared size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. NVIDIA has 128 GB LPDDR5X, 256-bit bus, and 273.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: Intel has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. NVIDIA has 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 48 RT cores. Tensor cores: Intel lists none, NVIDIA has 384.

Pixel and texture rates: Intel achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. NVIDIA achieves 116.1 GPixel/s and 928.5 GTexel/s.

FP16 performance: Intel delivers 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32. NVIDIA delivers 29.71 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning it does not double throughput for FP16.

Power and interface: Intel has 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and IGP bus interface. NVIDIA has 140 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, 300 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

Display and APIs: Intel outputs are portable device dependent, with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. NVIDIA has a single HDMI output with no graphics API support recorded.

Physical dimensions: Intel has no recorded length, height, or width. NVIDIA measures 150 mm by 51 mm by 150 mm.

Release and lineage: Intel was released January 26, 2026, succeeding HD Graphics-WM. NVIDIA was released October 14, 2025, succeeding Server Hopper and succeeded by Server Rubin.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GB10, and the wins tally shows zero for each side. However, the available benchmark data for the NVIDIA GB10 provides context for its performance tier, while the Intel part's absence of recorded scores limits direct comparison.

The NVIDIA GB10's Geekbench OpenCL score is 120,137, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 114,648, yielding an average of 117,393. This places the GB10 in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Against its nearest rivals, the GB10 leads the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation by 0.3% (117,393 versus 117,088), trails the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 by 1.3% (117,393 versus 118,976), and leads the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 2.6% (117,393 versus 114,395). The GB10 also beats the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile by 3% (117,393 versus 113,944).

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores in the database and no nearest rivals listed. Its performance can only be inferred from its specification sheet. With 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and a 50th percentile standing, the Intel part operates in a lower performance tier than the GB10's 95th percentile. The FP32 gap alone is substantial: the GB10 outputs 29.71 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, a 4.8x difference. Pixel fill rates show a similar disparity, with NVIDIA reaching 116.1 GPixel/s against Intel's 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture throughput diverges even more widely: NVIDIA's 928.5 GTexel/s is roughly 9.7 times Intel's 96.00 GTexel/s.

Memory bandwidth amplifies the separation. The GB10's 273.2 GB/s dedicated bandwidth exceeds what the Intel part can access through system-shared memory, where bandwidth is system dependent and not quantified. The GB10 also carries 128 GB of memory, while the Intel part's capacity depends entirely on the host system's RAM.

The NVIDIA GB10's tensor core count of 384 and 1:1 FP16 ratio indicate strong AI and machine learning throughput, while the Intel part's FP16 ratio of 2:1 suggests lower precision compute is not a primary focus. The GB10's 48 RT cores versus Intel's 10 RT cores also points to significantly higher ray tracing throughput, though neither part's ray tracing performance has direct benchmark scores recorded.

The data shows the NVIDIA GB10 as a high-performance server accelerator with benchmark scores in the top 5% of all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 remains an unmeasured integrated solution with a mid-tier percentile ranking. The specification differences, particularly in shading units, memory bandwidth, and FP32 throughput, indicate the GB10 outperforms the Intel part by a wide margin in compute-intensive tasks, while the Intel part's advantage lies in its 25 W power envelope and integration into mobile platforms.