Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Arc Pro A60 and Intel Arc Pro B370 occupy very different positions in the database. The A60 is a discrete professional GPU with a recorded average benchmark score of 60,326, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The B370, by contrast, is an integrated graphics processor with no recorded benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. This is not a close contest in raw compute terms.

The A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (at 2:1 ratio). The B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16. That places the A60 roughly 37% ahead in FP32 throughput and about 37% ahead in FP16 throughput as well. The pixel fill rate tells a similar story: the A60 achieves 131.2 GPixel/s versus the B370's 48.00 GPixel/s, a 173% advantage. Texture rate shows 262.4 GTexel/s on the A60 against 96.00 GTexel/s on the B370, again a lead of roughly 173%.

The A60's nearest rival in the database is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, with an average score of 60,347 and a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, which is 2.5% above the A60. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 sits 0.3% behind at 60,140, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 trails by 2.8% at 58,657. These deltas show the A60 clustering tightly with some of the fastest GPUs in the database, while the B370 has no comparable entries.

The A60 records two specific benchmark scores: 63,485 in Geekbench OpenCL and 57,166 in Geekbench Vulkan. The B370 has no benchmark entries at all. The database indicates zero wins for either product in head-to-head comparisons, which reflects the absence of shared test data rather than a competitive tie.

Memory configuration further separates the two. The A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The B370 relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, which means its performance scales with the host platform's memory subsystem rather than a dedicated VRAM pool. The A60's dedicated memory bandwidth is a decisive advantage for data-heavy workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The A60 wins in every measurable compute category. Its shading unit count of 2048 versus 1280 on the B370 gives it a 60% advantage in raw shader throughput. The A60's 128 texture mapping units and 64 raster output units dwarf the B370's 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also favors the A60: 16 RT cores versus 10 on the B370.

The A60 is a single-slot discrete card using PCIe 4.0 x16, with four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, no power connectors, and display outputs described as portable device dependent. The A60's suggested power supply is 300 W, while the B370 lists no suggested PSU because it draws from the host system.

Clock speeds reveal a different tradeoff. The B370 boosts to 2400 MHz, which is 350 MHz higher than the A60's 2050 MHz boost. However, the B370's base clock is only 300 MHz, suggesting aggressive power management on the integrated part. The A60's base clock of 900 MHz is three times higher, indicating sustained performance headroom.

The B370 does win on power efficiency. Its TDP of 25 W versus the A60's 130 W means the integrated part consumes roughly 81% less power. The B370 uses no power connectors, while the A60's connector situation is unspecified in the database. For fanless or passively cooled portable systems, the B370's thermal envelope is the clear advantage.

Architecture Differences

The A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist (Pro Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter.

The B370 uses the Panther Lake chip based on Xe3-LPG architecture, from the Arc Graphics-WM generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and transistor density is not recorded.

The A16nm process node difference is significant. The 3 nm node on the B370 is two process generations ahead of the A60's 6 nm node, which explains how the B370 achieves a higher boost clock at a fraction of the power. The B370's 2400 MHz boost versus the A60's 2050 MHz boost comes despite the B370 having roughly one-third the TDP.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The A60 has a dedicated memory interface, while the B370's memory is system-shared. The B370's predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-WM, and it was released later in the database timeline. The A60's release date is 2023-06-05, while the B370's is 2026-01-26.

The A60's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, a standard discrete GPU connection. The B370's bus interface is simply listed as IGP, meaning it connects through the processor's integrated graphics path rather than a dedicated expansion slot. The A60's display outputs are four DisplayPort 2.0 ports, while the B370's outputs depend on the portable device it is integrated into.

The Verdict

The database shows two products designed for entirely different segments. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is a discrete professional GPU with a 88th percentile ranking, dedicated GDDR6 memory, and benchmark scores that place it alongside the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M. Its average benchmark score of 60,326 puts it within 0.3% of the Radeon Pro Vega 48 and 2.8% ahead of the Radeon PRO V710. The only rival that beats it in the recorded data is the Radeon Pro W6600M at 2.5% higher average score.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 50th percentile ranking and no recorded benchmarks. Its performance is entirely dependent on the host system's shared memory. The data indicates the B370 is suited for portable devices where power consumption of 25 W and the absence of discrete graphics hardware are priorities.

The A60 should be selected for workloads that require dedicated VRAM, high pixel and texture throughput, and sustained compute performance. Its 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, and 16 ray tracing cores make it the choice for professional rendering, compute acceleration, and multi-display setups. The B370 should be selected for systems where integration, low power draw, and zero additional cooling requirements matter more than raw throughput.

The benchmark data favors the A60 in every recorded metric, but the B370's newer 3 nm process and higher boost clock indicate architectural advancement. The B370's lack of benchmark entries in the database means its real-world performance cannot be quantified here. The A60's established scores make it the only one of the two with verifiable performance data.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How do the FP32 performance figures compare?

A: The A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The A60 is approximately 37% ahead.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The B370 boosts to 2400 MHz, which is higher than the A60's 2050 MHz boost. However, the B370's base clock is only 300 MHz versus the A60's 900 MHz.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The A60 has a TDP of 130 W with a suggested power supply of 300 W. The B370 has a TDP of 25 W and no power connectors.

Q: How does the A60 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The A60's average score of 60,326 is 0% different from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (60,347), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140), 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896), and 2.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657).