Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The data presents an extreme asymmetry between these two mobile graphics solutions. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is an integrated processor graphics unit for Meteor Lake laptops, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a discrete flagship-class mobile GPU. The benchmark database records a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the RTX 5080 SUPER of 3075 points, while the Intel Arc 48EU has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 points (2.8% ahead), Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 points (3.4% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 points (3.1% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 points (3.6% behind).

The RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear selection for any workload requiring discrete graphics performance. Its 10752 shading units, 336 tensor cores, and 84 RT cores place it in a completely different performance class. The Intel Arc 48EU, with 384 shading units and no RT or tensor core count listed, serves as a basic integrated solution for thin-and-light notebooks. Users needing gaming, ray tracing, or CUDA-accelerated workloads should select the RTX 5080 SUPER. Users requiring only basic display output and light 2D acceleration from an integrated GPU should consider the Intel Arc 48EU.

The RTX 5080 SUPER carries a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The Intel Arc 48EU has no listed launch MSRP, reflecting its role as an integrated component rather than a standalone product.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile uses the Xe-LPG architecture on Intel's Meteor Lake chip, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB203 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5080 SUPER contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip has no transistor count or die size recorded.

The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The Intel Arc 48EU uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning it borrows from the host laptop's RAM. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective data rate.

The rendering pipelines diverge sharply. The Intel Arc 48EU has 384 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation units. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The RTX 5080 SUPER also includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores; the Intel part lists neither field. The RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel Arc 48EU uses a Ring Bus interface. The NVIDIA part is dual-slot with a 16-pin power connector and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel part is an IGP with portable device dependent display outputs. The RTX 5080 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher recorded benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 points. The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark performance?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075 score is 2.8% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163), 3.4% behind the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182), 3.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983), and 3.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967).

Q: What memory configurations do these two GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc 48EU uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Arc 48EU is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The RTX 5080 SUPER is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Arc 48EU supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc 48EU has a TDP of 28 W. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 45,600 million |

| Die size | Not recorded | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | Not recorded | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1800 MHz | 2617 MHz |

| Memory clock | System Shared | 2000 MHz, 32 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 1.02 TB/s |

| Shading units | 384 | 10752 |

| TMUs | 24 | 336 |

| ROPs | 8 | 112 |

| RT cores | Not recorded | 84 |

| Tensor cores | Not recorded | 336 |

| Pixel rate | 14.40 GPixel/s | 293.1 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 43.20 GTexel/s | 879.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 1,382.4 GFLOPS | 56.28 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 2.765 TFLOPS (2:1) | 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 28 W | 415 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None recorded | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width |

| Release date | 2023-12-13 | 2025-12-31 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The only recorded benchmark for the RTX 5080 SUPER is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scored 3075 points. The Intel Arc 48EU has no benchmark entries at all.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075 Steel Nomad score places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro B60, scores 3182 points, which is 3.4% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3163 points, 2.8% higher. The RTX 5080 SUPER leads the NVIDIA GeForce 820A by 3.1% (3075 vs 2983) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M by 3.6% (3075 vs 2967). These deltas indicate the RTX 5080 SUPER sits in a narrow performance band around the 3000-point mark in this specific test.

The FP32 compute figures illustrate the raw throughput gap. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 1,382.4 GFLOPS for the Intel Arc 48EU. The RTX 5080 SUPER also delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part delivers 2.765 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The texture rate difference is similarly stark: 879.3 GTexel/s versus 43.20 GTexel/s. The pixel rate difference is 293.1 GPixel/s versus 14.40 GPixel/s.

The absence of Intel benchmark scores means no direct win/loss tally exists. The wins field records 0 for both parts in head-to-head benchmarks.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 28 W TDP allows it to function as an IGP in Meteor Lake laptops without a discrete power connector. Its Ring Bus interface and system shared memory architecture eliminate the need for dedicated VRAM, reducing cost and complexity in portable devices. The 300 MHz base clock and 1800 MHz boost clock are sufficient for basic display output and lightweight graphics tasks. Its production status is Active, and it has a predecessor in HD Graphics-M. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, enabling modern API compatibility for everyday applications.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins in every recorded performance category. Its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is over 40 times the Intel part's 1,382.4 GFLOPS. The 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate dwarf the Intel part's 43.20 GTexel/s and 14.40 GPixel/s. The 24 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth provides ample storage and throughput for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads that the Intel part cannot handle. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides high-bandwidth host communication. The 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost clocks are more than seven times the Intel part's base clock and 45% higher than its boost clock. The RTX 5080 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, adding features beyond the Intel part's DirectX 12_1 support. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 confirms its discrete-class performance, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark data.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W TDP and dual-slot form factor require substantial cooling and power delivery, making it suitable for large laptops or external GPU enclosures. Its 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 40 mm width define its physical footprint. The Intel Arc 48EU's IGP form factor suits thin-and-light designs where space and power are constrained. The release dates indicate the Intel part launched on 2023-12-13, while the RTX 5080 SUPER launched on 2025-12-31.

The data supports a clear division: the Intel Arc 48EU serves portable, low-power systems, while the RTX 5080 SUPER serves performance-intensive workloads including gaming, rendering, and compute. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 3075, with rival deltas ranging from -3.4% to +3.6%, shows it clusters with mid-range discrete GPUs from previous generations. The Intel part's lack of benchmark entries prevents any direct performance comparison, but its architectural specifications place it firmly in the integrated graphics category.