Intel Arc Graphics 24EU vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

The Verdict

The database presents two fundamentally different products. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an integrated GPU embedded within the Arrow Lake-S processor, designed for basic display output and light graphical tasks within a constrained power envelope. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a standalone dual-slot discrete graphics card built on the TrueGPU architecture, carrying substantial dedicated memory and a much higher thermal design power. The recorded data positions the LX ULTRA as the significantly more capable graphics solution based on its raw specification sheet, while the Intel part occupies the entry-level integrated segment, as shown by its 3rd percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU's average benchmark score of 733 places it at the 3rd percentile, meaning it outperforms only a small fraction of the graphics hardware in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU, both with identical average scores of 733 and a delta of 0 percent, indicating that within this integrated family, the 24EU model delivers comparable measured performance in the single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723, placing the Intel part 1.4 percent ahead, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, putting the Intel part 2.4 percent behind.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, placing it squarely in the middle of the distribution. It has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database, which limits direct performance comparisons. However, its specification sheet indicates a different class of hardware: 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, 6144 shading units, and a peak FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS. These figures vastly exceed the Intel integrated solution on every measurable compute and memory parameter. The verdict is straightforward: the LX ULTRA targets workloads requiring substantial graphics throughput and memory capacity, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU serves as a basic integrated option for systems where a discrete card is absent.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins in the context of platform integration and power efficiency. Its 65 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it requires no additional power connectors and occupies no expansion slot, making it suitable for compact or low-power systems where a discrete GPU is not necessary. Its Ring Bus interface ties it directly to the Arrow Lake-S processor, and its 3 nm process node from TSMC suggests a modern manufacturing process that contributes to its modest power draw. The recorded benchmark score of 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while low in the overall percentile ranking, demonstrates that it can execute modern DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads, albeit at a minimal performance level.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively in raw graphics capability. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory is a dedicated pool, not shared with the system, which eliminates memory contention and allows large textures and datasets to reside on the card. The 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a data throughput that the Intel part cannot approach, as the Arc 24EU relies on system memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The LX ULTRA's 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units deliver a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. These figures are 16 times higher for pixel rate and texture rate compared to the Intel part's 12.00 GPixel/s and 24.00 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA also supports four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the Intel IGP's display outputs are motherboard dependent, giving the discrete card more flexible multi-monitor configurations.

Architecture Differences

The two products diverge at the architectural level. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation, and is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². The chip is the Arrow Lake-S, and it uses a Ring Bus interface to communicate with the rest of the processor. Its memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, and its clock speeds range from a 300 MHz base to a 2000 MHz boost.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation, with the chip designated as 7G105. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, though its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. The memory configuration is fundamentally different: 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. This dedicated memory operates independently of the system RAM, and the card connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, a standard expansion interface. The LX ULTRA's shading units number 6144, a 32-fold increase over the Intel part's 192 shading units. The TMU count of 192 is 16 times higher, and the ROP count of 96 is 16 times higher. The FP32 compute rating of 24.58 TFLOPS is 32 times the Intel part's 768.0 GFLOPS. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the LX ULTRA uses Vulkan 1.3 while the Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is 733. It matches the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU exactly, both also scoring 733 with a 0 percent delta. It sits 1.4 percent above the AMD Radeon HD 6470M (score 723) and 2.4 percent below the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M (score 751).

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: The LX ULTRA carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective data rate. This yields a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, by contrast, uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent.

Q: Which product has a higher pixel rate and texture rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU delivers 12.00 GPixel/s and 24.00 GTexel/s, making the LX ULTRA 16 times higher in both metrics.

Q: What are the power requirements for each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a TDP of 65 W and is an integrated GPU (IGP), meaning it requires no additional power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W.

Q: What is the DirectX support for both products?

A: Both the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). They also both support OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the production status and release timing for these products?

A: Both products are listed as Active in production. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a release date of 2024-10-23, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This absence of comparative measured data means any performance assessment must rely on the individual specification records and the Intel part's standalone benchmark result.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has one recorded benchmark: a score of 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This score places it at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. The LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0, yet it holds a 50th percentile ranking. The percentile disparity suggests that the LX ULTRA's position is derived from its specification profile rather than measured test results, while the Intel part's percentile reflects an actual executed workload.

Examining the compute specifications reveals the scale of difference. The Intel part's FP32 throughput is 768.0 GFLOPS, while the LX ULTRA's is 24.58 TFLOPS, a 32-fold gap. The FP16 figures show 1.536 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for Lisuan, again a 32-fold difference. The shading unit count of 192 versus 6144 matches this ratio. The memory bandwidth comparison is stark: the Intel part has no dedicated bandwidth figure, relying on system memory, while the LX ULTRA provides 432.0 GB/s. The pixel rate of 12.00 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 24.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s both show a 16-fold advantage for the discrete card.

The closest rivals to the Intel part in the database, the Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU, share the exact same 733 average score with a 0 percent delta. This indicates that within the integrated Arc lineup, the 24EU configuration does not sacrifice measured performance in this specific test, likely due to shared bottlenecks elsewhere in the system. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails by 1.4 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads by 2.4 percent, placing the Intel IGP in a narrow performance band around these older discrete mobile parts.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is manufactured by Intel, uses the Arrow Lake-S chip, and belongs to the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation with the Xe-LPG architecture. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA lists its manufacturer as Unknown, uses the 7G105 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation with the TrueGPU architecture. The process nodes differ: Intel uses 3 nm, while Lisuan uses 6 nm, both from TSMC. The Intel part reports 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock specifications show a split. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with system-shared memory. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock listed but specifies its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ: Intel uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while Lisuan uses 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The compute units scale dramatically: Intel has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs, while Lisuan has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate and texture rate are 12.00 GPixel/s and 24.00 GTexel/s for Intel versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for Lisuan. FP32 and FP16 throughput are 768.0 GFLOPS and 1.536 TFLOPS for Intel versus 24.58 TFLOPS and 49.15 TFLOPS for Lisuan.

The power and physical profiles diverge completely. Intel's TDP is 65 W with an IGP slot width and no power connectors, while Lisuan's TDP is 225 W with a dual-slot width, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The bus interface is a Ring Bus for Intel versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan. Display outputs are motherboard dependent for Intel, while Lisuan provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions are absent for Intel but listed for Lisuan: 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The API support shows DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 on both, but Vulkan differs: 1.4 for Intel and 1.3 for Lisuan. Release dates are 2024-10-23 for Intel and 2026-03-16 for Lisuan, with both marked as Active. The Intel part lists its predecessor as HD Graphics, while the LX ULTRA has no predecessor.