Intel Arc Graphics 24EU vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy entirely different segments of the GPU market. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution built into Arrow Lake-S processors, designed for basic display output and light 3D workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with dedicated GDDR6 memory and a 225 W thermal design power, aimed at substantial gaming and compute tasks.

According to the database, the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs. That percentile ranking means it outperforms only a small fraction of the entire GPU landscape. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU, both with identical average scores of 733, and the AMD Radeon HD 6470M, which trails by 1.4 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads it by 2.4 percent. These are all older or lower-end parts, confirming the 24EU sits at the entry level.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, but its specifications place it in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. That percentile is a midpoint ranking, suggesting it lands in the middle of the performance distribution. With 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, the LX 7G100 has dramatically more raw processing hardware than the Intel part. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs. Those numbers differ by factors of 32, 16, and 16 respectively.

The verdict is straightforward. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is for systems that need integrated display capabilities without a separate graphics card. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is for users who require a dedicated card with its own memory pool and much higher throughput. The data does not support using the Intel part for demanding 3D applications, while the Lisuan Tech card is clearly positioned for those tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures, process nodes, and memory systems. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is built on the Xe-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation. It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC and contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 73.3 million transistors per square millimeter. This is an integrated graphics processor, meaning it shares system memory rather than having its own dedicated VRAM.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, built on a 6 nm TSMC process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. Unlike the Intel part, the LX 7G100 has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent, since it uses shared system memory.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed in the database. The Intel part's memory type is also system shared, with the bus width and bandwidth all dependent on the host system's memory configuration.

Feature support differs in the API list. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech card supports Vulkan 1.3. The Intel part uses a Ring Bus interface, while the Lisuan Tech card uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The physical characteristics are also different. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an IGP, meaning it has no slot width, no power connectors, and no separate dimensions. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. It requires a single 8-pin power connector and has a suggested power supply rating of 550 W. Its TDP is 225 W, compared to 65 W for the Intel integrated part.

The Lisuan Tech card provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel part's display outputs are motherboard dependent. The Intel part was released on October 23, 2024, and the Lisuan Tech card has a release date of June 17, 2026. Both are listed as active in production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs, and the wins tally shows zero for each side. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a single recorded benchmark score of 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries at all, so direct numerical comparison is not possible from recorded measurements.

What the data does provide is the Intel part's nearest rival comparisons. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU both match the 733 average score exactly, with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723, which is 1.4 percent behind the Intel 24EU. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, which is 2.4 percent ahead. These deltas are small, indicating the Intel 24EU performs in a narrow band alongside these older mobile parts.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no nearest rivals listed and no average benchmark score. Its percentile ranking of 50 is the only performance-related metric available. That percentile sits far above the Intel part's 3rd percentile. The gap between the 3rd and 50th percentiles is substantial, meaning the Lisuan Tech card is expected to outperform the vast majority of GPUs that the Intel part trails.

The specification-derived performance figures tell a clearer story. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU delivers 768.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. That is a difference of roughly 32 times in raw floating-point throughput. The pixel rate differs from 12.00 GPixel/s to 192.0 GPixel/s, a 16 times gap. The texture rate goes from 24.00 GTexel/s to 384.0 GTexel/s, also a 16 times difference. The FP16 figures are 1.536 TFLOPS for the Intel part versus 49.15 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech card, a 32 times gap.

These are not close products. The benchmark data shows the Intel part competing with decade-old mobile GPUs, while the Lisuan Tech card's specifications place it in a completely different performance class.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct comparison can be made from measured results.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system shared or system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a 65 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply rating of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU supports Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The Intel part has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the Lisuan Tech transistor count and die size are unknown.

Q: How do their percentile rankings compare?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU sits in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 sits in the 50th percentile. That places the Intel part near the bottom of the performance distribution and the Lisuan Tech card in the middle.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins in integration efficiency and low power draw. Its 65 W TDP fits within the power envelope of a mainstream processor, and its IGP form factor requires no additional slot space, power connectors, or display cabling. The motherboard handles all display outputs. This makes it suitable for office systems, basic media playback, and light 2D workloads where a discrete card would be unnecessary. The 3rd percentile ranking indicates it handles only the least demanding 3D tasks, and its nearest rivals are all older or equally modest parts.

The Intel part also wins on process technology. Its 3 nm node is more advanced than the Lisuan Tech card's 6 nm node, and its transistor density of 73.3 million per square millimeter reflects that. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die is a dense design. The shared memory approach means no dedicated VRAM allocation is needed, which simplifies system design.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins decisively on raw compute and memory resources. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs dwarf the Intel part's 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs. The 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 figure is roughly 32 times the Intel part's 768.0 GFLOPS. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a dedicated memory pool that does not contend with the CPU for system RAM. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs around the median of all GPUs, which is a far stronger position than the Intel part's 3rd percentile.

The Lisuan Tech card wins on connectivity and physical presence. It offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and a dual-slot cooling design with dimensions of 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm. The 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested power supply indicate a card that expects a real power delivery system. The Intel part, with its Ring Bus interface and motherboard-dependent outputs, is not designed for such installations.

The Lisuan Tech card also wins on memory bandwidth by a massive margin. Its 432.0 GB/s figure stands against the Intel part's system dependent bandwidth, which is constrained by the host system's memory architecture. For workloads that are memory-bandwidth sensitive, such as high-resolution texturing or large compute buffers, the dedicated GDDR6 solution provides consistent performance.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The Intel part contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die with a density of 73.3 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech card's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Lisuan Tech card has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks also differ: the Intel part uses system shared memory, while the Lisuan Tech card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Intel part has system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech card has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s. The shading unit count is 192 versus 6144, TMUs are 12 versus 192, and ROPs are 6 versus 96.

Compute throughput figures show a 32 times gap in FP32 (768.0 GFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS) and FP16 (1.536 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS). Pixel rate is 12.00 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 24.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. The TDP difference is 65 W versus 225 W.

Physical specifications differ completely. The Intel part is an IGP with no slot width, power connectors, or dimensions. The Lisuan Tech card is dual-slot, measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, uses one 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The bus interface is Ring Bus versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are motherboard dependent versus four DisplayPort 1.4a connections.

API support differs only in Vulkan version: 1.4 for Intel, 1.3 for Lisuan Tech. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Release dates are October 23, 2024 for the Intel part and June 17, 2026 for the Lisuan Tech card. Both are active in production. The Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics, while the Lisuan Tech card has no predecessor listed. Neither has a successor listed, and neither has a launch MSRP in the database.