Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile and Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy opposite ends of the graphics hardware spectrum. The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark scores for these two parts, so the analysis must rely entirely on the recorded architectural and specification data. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution built for portability, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a large discrete add-in board designed for maximum throughput. The data shows a clear separation in capability, power, and intended deployment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no benchmark scores for either the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile or the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The average benchmark score for both entries is recorded as zero, and the percentile versus all GPUs is listed as 50 for each. Without measured performance data, direct comparisons of frame rates or compute workloads cannot be made from the recorded information.

What the data does provide is theoretical peak throughput figures, which serve as a proxy for computational capability. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile delivers 588.8 GFLOPS. This means the LX MAX has a theoretical FP32 throughput that is approximately 41.7 times higher than the Intel part. In FP16 workloads, the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, compared to 1,177.6 GFLOPS for the Intel chip, a ratio of roughly 41.7 to 1 again, since both use a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio.

Pixel throughput shows a similar gap. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile achieves 9.200 GPixel/s. This indicates the LX MAX can fill the screen with shaded pixels at a rate over 20 times faster than the Intel integrated solution. Texture rate follows the same pattern: the LX MAX offers 384.0 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a difference of about 20.9 times.

These figures represent theoretical limits, not measured application performance. However, the magnitude of the differences is so large that no real-world workload would close the gap. The LX MAX, with its dedicated memory subsystem and massive shader array, is designed for tasks that the Intel IGP cannot physically handle at usable speeds.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use entirely different architectures, built on different process nodes by different foundries. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, which is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation and uses the Wildcat Lake chip. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, built around the 7G106 chip.

Manufacturing processes differ significantly. The Intel chip is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Lisuan chip is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The 3 nm node is smaller, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power per transistor, but the database does not record transistor counts or die sizes for either part. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), meaning it shares a package with the CPU and uses system memory. The Lisuan part is a discrete GPU that connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and carries its own dedicated video memory.

Memory architecture is a fundamental differentiator. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses System Shared memory, with bandwidth described as System Dependent. This means the GPU borrows from the main system memory pool, and performance varies with the host platform's memory configuration. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth. The memory clock is recorded as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. This dedicated memory provides consistent, high-bandwidth access that system-shared memory cannot match.

Shader resources show a large disparity. The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 4 render output units (ROPs). It also includes 1 ray tracing core. The Lisuan part has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX MAX does not list any ray tracing cores in the database. Neither part records tensor cores.

API support differs in one notable area. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3. This means the Intel IGP has a newer Vulkan version, though the practical impact depends on application usage.

Power and physical design are also contrasting. The Intel part has a TDP of 25 W, uses an IGP slot width, has no power connectors, and requires no separate power supply recommendation. The Lisuan part has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and the database lists a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions because it is an integrated chip.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in portability and power efficiency. Its 25 W TDP means it can be integrated into compact devices without dedicated cooling or extra power delivery. The IGP slot width and lack of power connectors indicate it is soldered onto the motherboard, requiring no user installation. Its process node advantage, 3 nm versus 6 nm, suggests better energy efficiency per transistor, though the database does not provide efficiency measurements. The Vulkan 1.4 support gives it a newer API version than the LX MAX.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in raw performance categories. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS vastly exceeds the Intel part. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a dedicated memory pool that does not contend with CPU traffic. The 192-bit bus and 96 ROPs support high-resolution rendering with heavy pixel fill rates. The dual-slot cooler and 16-pin power connector are designed to sustain the 225 W power draw required for high compute loads.

In terms of display outputs, the Intel part is listed as Portable Device Dependent, meaning outputs vary by the host device. The Lisuan part provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which supports multi-monitor setups directly. The LX MAX also has a larger physical footprint, which allows for more substantial cooling hardware.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs:

• Architecture: Intel uses Xe3-LPG, Lisuan uses TrueGPU
• Chip: Intel uses Wildcat Lake, Lisuan uses 7G106
• Generation: Intel is Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake), Lisuan is 7G100
• Process Node: Intel is 3 nm, Lisuan is 6 nm
• Foundry: Intel is Intel, Lisuan is TSMC
• Base Clock: Intel is 300 MHz, Lisuan is not recorded
• Boost Clock: Intel is 2300 MHz, Lisuan is not recorded
• Memory Size: Intel is System Shared, Lisuan is 12 GB
• Memory Type: Intel is System Shared, Lisuan is GDDR6
• Memory Bus Width: Intel is System Shared, Lisuan is 192 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: Intel is System Dependent, Lisuan is 432.0 GB/s
• Memory Clock: Intel is not recorded, Lisuan is 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
• Shading Units: Intel is 128, Lisuan is 6144
• TMUs: Intel is 8, Lisuan is 192
• ROPs: Intel is 4, Lisuan is 96
• RT Cores: Intel is 1, Lisuan is not recorded
• Pixel Rate: Intel is 9.200 GPixel/s, Lisuan is 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: Intel is 18.40 GTexel/s, Lisuan is 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: Intel is 588.8 GFLOPS, Lisuan is 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: Intel is 1,177.6 GFLOPS, Lisuan is 49.15 TFLOPS
• TDP: Intel is 25 W, Lisuan is 225 W
• Slot Width: Intel is IGP, Lisuan is Dual-slot
• Power Connectors: Intel is None, Lisuan is 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: Intel is not recorded, Lisuan is 550 W
• Bus Interface: Intel is IGP, Lisuan is PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display Outputs: Intel is Portable Device Dependent, Lisuan is 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan Version: Intel is 1.4, Lisuan is 1.3
• Dimensions: Intel is not recorded, Lisuan is 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm
• Release Date: Intel is 2026-04-15, Lisuan is 2026-03-16

Fields that are the same include DirectX 12 Ultimate support, OpenGL 4.6 support, production status of Active, and the absence of a launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 588.8 GFLOPS. The LX MAX delivers roughly 41.7 times the theoretical FP32 throughput.

Q: Does the Intel part have ray tracing support?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile records 1 ray tracing core. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX does not list any ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What memory does each GPU use?

A: The Intel part uses System Shared memory with a System Dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan part uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz.

Q: Which GPU has a smaller process node?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Intel part has a TDP of 25 W. The Lisuan part has a TDP of 225 W and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ in Vulkan support, with Intel at 1.4 and Lisuan at 1.3.

The Verdict

The data presents two devices with no overlapping use cases. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated GPU with a 25 W TDP, 128 shading units, and system-shared memory. It is built on a 3 nm process and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation. Its performance envelope is suited to lightweight tasks on portable devices where power draw and physical footprint are constrained.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with a 225 W TDP, 6144 shading units, 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and a 192-bit memory bus. It delivers 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. It requires a 550 W power supply and a 1x 16-pin power connector. Its physical dimensions are 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm.

The recorded data shows no benchmark scores for either part, so performance claims must be drawn from theoretical specifications. The LX MAX's compute, pixel rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth are all orders of magnitude higher than the Intel IGP. The Intel part counters with a smaller process node, a newer Vulkan version, and ray tracing support, but its capabilities are limited by 128 shading units and shared memory.

Users requiring high-resolution rendering, large texture datasets, or compute-heavy tasks should select the Lisuan Tech LX MAX based on its dedicated memory and high throughput figures. Users prioritizing low power consumption, compact integration, and minimal system requirements should select the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. The selection is not a competition between equals; it is a choice between two distinct product categories defined by the recorded specifications.