Intel Arc B770 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data places the Intel Arc B770 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX at the same overall percentile ranking (50th percentile) within the database, indicating they occupy a similar tier of overall graphics capability. However, the architecture and specification sheets reveal two distinctly different performance profiles. The Intel Arc B770 is built around a wider memory subsystem, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 256-bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX counters with a substantially higher compute ceiling, offering 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput against the Intel part's 19.66 TFLOPS. For users whose workloads depend on raw shading throughput and sustained compute, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents the stronger data sheet. For those whose tasks rely on memory bandwidth, pixel throughput, and texture fetch rates, the Intel Arc B770 holds the advantage. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also offers a more compact physical footprint, measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, whereas the Intel Arc B770's dimensions are not recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance according to the database?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 25% higher than the Intel Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS also exceeds the Intel part's 39.32 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The Intel Arc B770 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card holds a bandwidth advantage of 80 GB/s.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX contains 6144 shading units, compared to 4096 on the Intel Arc B770. However, the Intel part has more texture mapping units (256 vs. 192) and more raster operation units (128 vs. 96).

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: Both cards have a recorded TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Intel Arc B770 uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector setup, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card supports more display outputs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel Arc B770 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, totaling four outputs as well, but with a newer DisplayPort revision.

Q: What API levels does each card support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc B770 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture using the BMG-G31 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Battlemage (Arc 7) generation and has a die size of 368 mm². The architecture is a successor to the Alchemist generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Its die size is not recorded. Both are dual-slot designs with a 225 W TDP and use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The Intel Arc B770 includes 32 ray tracing cores, a feature that is not listed for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The Intel part also specifies a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no base or boost clock values recorded in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a production status of Active, while the Intel Arc B770's production status is not listed. The Intel part was released on 2025-12-31, and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX was released on 2026-03-16.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across several recorded fields. The Intel Arc B770 has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel part lists 32 ray tracing cores; the Lisuan Tech LX MAX does not list any. The Intel Arc B770 provides 16 GB of memory over a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX provides 12 GB over a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The memory clock differs: the Intel Arc B770 runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The pixel rate for the Intel part is 307.2 GPixel/s, versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s for the Intel part, versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. FP32 compute is 19.66 TFLOPS for the Intel part and 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, with FP16 compute at 39.32 TFLOPS and 49.15 TFLOPS respectively.

The power connector configuration differs: the Intel Arc B770 uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin connector, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a single 16-pin connector. Display outputs differ as well: the Intel part offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Vulkan API version differs: the Intel Arc B770 supports Vulkan 1.4, and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Physical dimensions are recorded only for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the Intel Arc B770's dimensions are not in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards, and neither card has individual benchmark scores or nearest rival data. The comparison therefore rests on the specification sheet and the derived performance indicators.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX leads in FP32 compute by a margin of 4.92 TFLOPS, from 24.58 TFLOPS versus 19.66 TFLOPS, which is a 25% advantage. In FP16 compute, the lead is 9.83 TFLOPS, from 49.15 TFLOPS versus 39.32 TFLOPS, also a 25% advantage. The shading unit count favors the Lisuan Tech LX MAX by 2048 units, from 6144 versus 4096. The memory clock is higher on the Lisuan Tech LX MAX as well, at 2250 MHz versus 2000 MHz, and the effective data rate is 18 Gbps versus 16 Gbps.

The Intel Arc B770 leads in memory bandwidth by 80 GB/s, from 512.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Its pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a lead of 115.2 GPixel/s. Its texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a lead of 230.4 GTexel/s. The Intel part also has more TMUs, 256 versus 192, and more ROPs, 128 versus 96. The Intel Arc B770 has a larger memory capacity, 16 GB versus 12 GB, and a wider memory bus, 256 bit versus 192 bit.

The Intel Arc B770's die size is recorded at 368 mm², while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's die size is unknown. The Intel part also has a newer DisplayPort revision, 2.1 versus 1.4a, and a newer Vulkan revision, 1.4 versus 1.3. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a smaller physical footprint, with a length of 248 mm versus no recorded length for the Intel part, and it uses a newer process node, 6 nm versus 5 nm, though the process node difference does not directly translate to a performance metric in the recorded data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B770 wins in scenarios that depend on memory bandwidth and fill rates. Its 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 614.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate a card suited for high-resolution rendering with heavy texture sampling and framebuffer operations. The 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs support this profile, and the 16 GB memory capacity provides additional headroom for large textures and datasets. The ray tracing cores, 32 of them, give the Intel part a hardware feature that the Lisuan Tech LX MAX does not list. The Intel Arc B770 also supports DisplayPort 2.1 and Vulkan 1.4, which are newer API revisions than the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's DisplayPort 1.4a and Vulkan 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in compute-heavy workloads that rely on raw shading throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 outputs are the highest recorded values in this comparison, and its 6144 shading units provide a substantial parallel compute resource. The 12 GB memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are lower than the Intel part, but the compute density is higher. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also has a higher memory clock, 2250 MHz, and a faster effective data rate, 18 Gbps. Its compact dimensions, 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, make it a smaller physical unit, which may ease installation in constrained chassis, though this is a physical attribute rather than a performance metric.

The database shows both cards at the same 50th percentile overall ranking, which indicates that neither has a definitive overall lead. The choice rests on workload type: the Intel Arc B770 for bandwidth and fill-rate-bound tasks, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX for compute-bound tasks. Both cards share a 225 W TDP, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so platform requirements are comparable. Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a recorded production status of Active, while the Intel Arc B770's status is not listed.