Intel Arc B770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc B770

CORE STATE BMG-G31
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe2-HPG
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 350 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,269.5

Analysis: Intel Arc B770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc B770 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The database contains a single benchmark entry for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6269.5 points. The Arc B770 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. This absence of overlapping test data means a direct numerical comparison of application performance cannot be established from the available measurements.

What can be analyzed is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's position relative to its recorded nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score of 6270 places it exactly level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which also scores 6270, a delta of 0%. Against the AMD FirePro W600, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 0.8% ahead. It trails the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% and the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single recorded benchmark result sits in a tightly clustered performance band around these four rivals. The database places the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in the 36th percentile among all GPUs, while the Arc B770 occupies the 50th percentile, though that percentile figure for the Arc B770 is not accompanied by any concrete benchmark score.

Without a shared benchmark workload, the only measurable performance comparison available is the theoretical compute and rendering throughput derived from the specification data. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, more than double the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. Texture throughput favors the NVIDIA card as well, with 686.6 GTexel/s against 614.4 GTexel/s for the Intel part. Pixel rate is the one rendering metric where the Arc B770 leads, at 307.2 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Memory bandwidth strongly favors the NVIDIA card, with 896.0 GB/s from GDDR7 memory compared to 512.0 GB/s from the Arc B770's GDDR6. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a substantial advantage in shading units, with 8960 versus 4096, and in ray tracing cores, with 70 versus 32. The Arc B770 has more ROPs, 128 against 96, which aligns with its higher pixel rate.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the stronger card on nearly every measurable specification that drives compute-heavy and bandwidth-sensitive workloads. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is roughly 2.2 times that of the Arc B770, and its memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s is 75% higher. For users running workloads that scale with shader count, tensor core throughput, or memory bandwidth, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice based on the recorded specifications. Its 280 tensor cores and 70 RT cores provide dedicated hardware that the Arc B770 does not match in count, and its 280 TMUs outnumber the Arc B770's 256.

The Arc B770 does hold advantages in two specific areas. Its pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s is 30.5% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 235.4 GPixel/s, which can matter for fill-rate-bound rendering scenarios at high resolutions. Its power draw is also substantially lower at 225 W versus 350 W, and it uses a more conventional dual power connector setup with one 6-pin and one 8-pin, rather than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single 16-pin connector. The Arc B770 also supports PCIe 4.0 x16 rather than PCIe 5.0 x16, which is a limitation but not necessarily a decisive one for most workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single benchmark result places it in the 36th percentile among all GPUs, while the Arc B770's unspecified percentile of 50 suggests the database ranks it higher overall, but without benchmark scores for the Arc B770, that percentile cannot be verified against actual test data. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD. Users who prioritize raw compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and ray tracing hardware should select the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Users who prioritize pixel fill rate and lower power consumption, and who are willing to accept lower compute throughput, may find the Arc B770 more suitable.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different architectures from different manufacturers. The Intel Arc B770 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage generation, specifically the Arc 7 series, built on the BMG-G31 chip. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 series, built on the GB203 chip. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node, so the underlying fabrication process is identical. The die sizes are close, with the Arc B770 at 368 mm² and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 378 mm², a difference of 10 mm².

Transistor counts differ sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER contains 45,600 million transistors, while the Arc B770's transistor count is listed as unknown. The NVIDIA chip achieves a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per mm². The Arc B770's transistor density is not recorded.

The compute architectures diverge significantly. The Arc B770 has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 70 RT cores, plus 280 tensor cores, which the Arc B770 does not list at all. FP16 processing differs as well: the Arc B770 delivers 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio relative to its FP32 throughput, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, meaning it does not gain a throughput advantage when switching to FP16.

Memory technology also differs. The Arc B770 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 512.0 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on the same 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s. The memory clock configuration reflects this: the Arc B770 runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. Higher effective data rate per pin is what gives the GDDR7 part its bandwidth advantage.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ modestly. The Arc B770 has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The NVIDIA card runs about 9% higher at base and about 2% higher at boost.

Power and cooling requirements differ. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and no suggested PSU is recorded. Both are dual-slot cards. The Arc B770 uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a single 16-pin connector.

The bus interface differs by one generation. The Arc B770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are similar but not identical. The Arc B770 provides one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Physical dimensions are recorded for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER only: 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Arc B770's dimensions are not listed. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a production status of Active, while the Arc B770's production status is not recorded. Both cards share the same release date in the database, and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the Arc B770 has no MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, more than double the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, while the Arc B770 has 512.0 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR6 on the same 256-bit bus.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The Arc B770 has a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s, which is higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 235.4 GPixel/s. The Arc B770 also has more ROPs, 128 versus 96.

Q: What are the power consumption figures for each card?

A: The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, with no suggested PSU recorded.

Q: Do both cards use the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. The Arc B770 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G31 chip, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0 on the GB203 chip.

Q: What is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single recorded benchmark score?

A: The database records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with an average benchmark score of 6270. The Arc B770 has no recorded benchmark scores.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in compute-intensive workloads. Its 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 8960 shading units, and 280 tensor cores give it a decisive advantage in tasks that scale with shader and tensor core count, such as general GPU compute, AI inference, and rendering workloads that leverage tensor operations. Its 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 75% higher than the Arc B770's, which benefits bandwidth-bound scenarios like high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset processing. The ray tracing hardware is also stronger, with 70 RT cores versus 32, making the NVIDIA card the better choice for ray-traced rendering workloads. Its 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate is 11.8% higher than the Arc B770's 614.4 GTexel/s, giving it a lead in texture-heavy scenes.

The Arc B770 wins in fill-rate-bound scenarios. Its pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s is 30.5% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 235.4 GPixel/s, and its 128 ROPs provide more rasterization hardware than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 96. This suggests an advantage in workloads that are limited by pixel output rather than shader compute or memory bandwidth. The Arc B770 also wins on power efficiency in absolute terms, drawing 225 W versus 350 W, a difference of 125 W. Its dual 6-pin and 8-pin power connector setup may be more compatible with older power supplies than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single 16-pin connector, though the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has no suggested PSU recorded to compare against.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides double the bus bandwidth of the Arc B770's PCIe 4.0 x16, which can matter for workloads that transfer data frequently between system memory and GPU memory. Its GDDR7 memory type is a generation ahead of the Arc B770's GDDR6, and its 28 Gbps effective memory speed exceeds the Arc B770's 16 Gbps effective. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a larger die at 378 mm² versus 368 mm², and a recorded transistor count of 45,600 million, while the Arc B770's transistor count is unknown. In the absence of direct benchmark comparisons, the specification data points to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER as the stronger all-around performer, with the Arc B770 holding specific advantages in pixel throughput and power draw.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
B770
RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
8,960 +118.8%
Shaders
4,096
8,960 +118.8%
TMUs
256
280 +9.4%
ROPs
128
96 -25.0%
Execution Units
32
—
Clocks
Base Clock
2100 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
16,384 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
—
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS (1:8)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
39.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
70 +118.8%
Tensor Cores
—
280
XMX Cores
256
—
Power
TDP
225 W
350 W
TDP (W)
225
350 +55.6%
Suggested PSU
550 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe2-HPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
BMG-G31
GB203
Generation
Battlemage (Arc 7)
GeForce 50
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,600 million
Die Size
368 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
—
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
749 USD
Production
—
Active
Predecessor
Alchemist
—
View Arc B770 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Details