Intel Arc B580 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows that the Intel Arc B580 has a complete set of benchmark results, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes direct head-to-head comparisons impossible for individual tests. The Intel Arc B580 achieved an average benchmark score of 23021 across its suite, which places it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with an average score of 23061 (0.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.6% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23172 (0.7% higher). The Intel card also sits within 1% of the NVIDIA P106-100, which scored 23249.

The Arc B580’s individual benchmark scores show a wide spread across different workloads. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it recorded a score of 3068. Geekbench results include 92821 for OpenCL and 109672 for Vulkan. PassMark scores range from 76 in DirectX 10 to 183 in DirectX 9, with DirectX 11 at 128 and DirectX 12 at 76. The PassMark G2D score is 709, while the G3D score reaches 15748. GPU compute in PassMark records 7729. The average benchmark score of 23021 is heavily influenced by the high Geekbench numbers, which dominate the overall figure.

Because the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot provide any comparative performance metrics. The wins count for both cards is zero, reflecting the absence of head-to-head test results. The Arc B580’s percentile ranking of 68 indicates it outperforms a majority of GPUs in the database, though its nearest rivals all sit within roughly one percentage point of its average score, suggesting a tightly clustered performance tier.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 holds a 50th percentile ranking, which is based on its position rather than measured scores. Without recorded benchmarks, this percentile likely reflects its classification within the database rather than actual test performance. The Arc B580's measurable results provide a concrete reference point, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 remains unquantified in direct comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmark scores, so no comparison is possible.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B580’s average score of 23021 is 0.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061), 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895), 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172), and 1% lower than the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249).

Q: What memory specifications do the two cards have?

A: The Arc B580 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4352 shading units, while the Arc B580 has 2560 shading units. The RTX 4060 Ti also has 136 tensor cores and 34 RT cores, compared to the Arc B580’s 20 RT cores and no listed tensor core count.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: Both cards list a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc B580 has a TDP of 190 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a TDP of 160 W and uses a single 16-pin connector.

Q: What is the release timeline for these products?

A: The Arc B580 was released on 2024-12-12, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 was released on 2024-03-31. The Arc B580 is listed as active in production, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is marked end-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B580 demonstrates clear advantages in memory capacity and bandwidth. With 12 GB of GDDR6 and a 192-bit bus, it provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantially higher than the RTX 4060 Ti AD104’s 8 GB and 288.0 GB/s. This suggests the Arc B580 is better suited for workloads that demand large frame buffers or high memory throughput, such as high-resolution textures or certain compute tasks.

The Arc B580 also shows wins in pixel and texture throughput. Its pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, compared to 121.7 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. Its texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s, versus 344.8 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the Arc B580 processes rasterization and texturing operations faster, which could translate to better performance in fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins on raw compute horsepower. Its FP32 performance is 22.06 TFLOPS, while the Arc B580 delivers 13.67 TFLOPS. The RTX 4060 Ti also has more shading units (4352 versus 2560) and a higher transistor density (121.8M per mm² versus 72.1M per mm²). These specifications point to stronger general-purpose compute capability for the NVIDIA card.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 also holds advantages in ray tracing and AI features. It has 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores, while the Arc B580 lists 20 RT cores and no tensor core count. This makes the RTX 4060 Ti the better option for ray-traced workloads and DLSS-related functionality, assuming software support aligns with the hardware.

Power efficiency is another area where the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 leads. Its TDP is 160 W, lower than the Arc B580’s 190 W, and it still delivers higher FP32 throughput. The RTX 4060 Ti also has a smaller physical footprint at 240 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width, versus the Arc B580’s 272 mm, 115 mm, and 45 mm dimensions.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ significantly in their core configurations. The Arc B580 uses the BMG-G21 chip with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Transistor density is higher on the NVIDIA chip at 121.8M per mm², versus 72.1M per mm² for Intel.

Clock speeds differ notably. The Arc B580 has a base clock of 2670 MHz and a boost clock of 2670 MHz, meaning it runs at a fixed frequency. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2535 MHz. Memory clocks are 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for the Arc B580 and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4060 Ti.

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 8 GB on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B580 also has more TMUs (160 versus 136) and ROPs (80 versus 48).

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses a 16-pin power connector, while the Arc B580 uses an 8-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards and both use PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs differ: the Arc B580 has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the RTX 4060 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The Arc B580 is built on Intel’s Xe2-HPG architecture and belongs to the Battlemage generation (Arc 5 series). It uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture and is part of the GeForce 40 series, also on a 5 nm TSMC process. Both are fabricated by TSMC, but the underlying microarchitectures are fundamentally different.

Intel’s Xe2-HPG focuses on a unified rendering approach with 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The Arc B580 has 20 RT cores for ray tracing. It does not list tensor cores, which means AI acceleration relies on other mechanisms or is not present in the same form as NVIDIA’s implementation. The FP16 performance is 27.34 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating it can double throughput for half-precision workloads.

NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture uses 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads. FP16 performance matches FP32 at 22.06 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning there is no throughput gain for half-precision calculations.

The transistor counts reflect different design philosophies. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.8M per mm². The Arc B580 uses 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a density of 72.1M per mm². This indicates NVIDIA’s design integrates more logic per area, likely due to the tensor cores and more complex scheduling hardware.

Memory architecture also differs. The Arc B580’s 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is wider than the RTX 4060 Ti’s 128-bit bus at 288.0 GB/s. This gives Intel an advantage in bandwidth-intensive scenarios, while NVIDIA compensates with higher compute throughput and cache efficiency, though cache details are not recorded in the database.

The Arc B580 is the predecessor to Alchemist, meaning it is the second generation of Intel discrete GPUs. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has the GeForce 30 series as its predecessor and the GeForce 50 series as its successor, placing it within a longer-established product line.

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual situation: one card has comprehensive benchmark results, while the other has none. The Intel Arc B580, with an average benchmark score of 23021 and a 68th percentile ranking, offers measurable performance that sits within 1% of several established GPUs like the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080. Its 12 GB memory capacity and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth make it a strong candidate for memory-heavy workloads.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 cannot be evaluated on benchmark performance because no scores are recorded in the database. Its specifications, however, show superior compute capability with 22.06 TFLOPS FP32, 4352 shading units, and dedicated tensor cores. Its lower TDP of 160 W and end-of-life status suggest it is a mature product, but its 8 GB memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are less impressive than the Arc B580’s memory subsystem.

Buyers prioritizing measured performance and memory capacity should consider the Arc B580, especially given its active production status and higher bandwidth. Those who need ray tracing or AI acceleration, based on the RTX 4060 Ti’s 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores, may prefer the NVIDIA card, though its lack of recorded benchmarks makes performance claims unverifiable in this database. The Arc B580’s launch MSRP is 249 USD, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a launch MSRP of 399 USD, but neither price should be weighed beyond that single factual statement.

The choice ultimately depends on whether the user values measurable results or specific feature sets. The database records only the Arc B580’s performance, so any comparison favoring the RTX 4060 Ti must rely on its architectural advantages, not test scores.